Quo Vadis of Expiration Claims in Indonesian Labor Law: A Corporate Perspective
Abstract
Verdict of Indonesian Constitutional Court No. 100 / PUU-X / 2012 and No. 114 / PUU-XIII / 2015 raises the new values in the expiration claims in the field of labor. This study aims to reveal the description of the new values that applicate at the dogmatic level related to the expiration claims after the Indonesian Constitutional Court Verdict No. 100 / PUU-X / 2012 and No. 114 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on the corporate perspective. This study uses normative juridical research, by analyzing secondary data obtained, including related legislation and court Verdicts. The results of this study are: there still found inconsistencies in the level of implementation of the cases which related to the expiration claim in the labor law, that causes legal uncertainty. This inconsistency is influenced by the philosophical basis used by the Indonesian Constitutional Court to decide the Indonesian Constitutional Court's Verdict No. 100 / PUU-X / 2012 and No. 114 / PUU-XIII / 2015. It is necessary and immediate to change the law related to the regulation of the expiration claims in the field of labor that prioritizing the principle of the good faith to see the interests of all parties in employment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Atmasasmita, Romli. Teori Hukum Integratif : Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan Dan Teori Hukum Progresif [Integrative Legal Theory: Reconstruction of Development Law Theory and Progressive Legal Theory]. Yogyakarta: Genta Pubishing, 2012.
Fajri, Em Zul, and Ratu Aprilia Senja. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia [Complete Indonesian Dictionary]. Semarang: Difa Publisher, 2008.
Freeman, R Edward. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.
Friedmann, W. Teori Dan Filsafat Hukum: Idealisme Filosofis Dan Problema Keadilan [Theory and Philosophy of Law-Philosophical Idealism and the Problem of Justice]. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1990.
Hadi, Nor. Corporate Social Responsibility. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2014.
Mardikanto, Totok. CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility (Tanggungjawab Sosial Korporasi). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Azas-Azas Hukum Perjanjian [The Basics of the Law of Contract]. Bandung: Bandar Maju, 2000.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi [Corporate Criminal Liability]. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers, 2007.
Wilk, Kurt. The Legal Philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin. Harvard University Press, 1950.
Journal:
Cindawati. “Prinsip Good Faith (Itikad Baik) Dalam Hukum Kontrak Bisnis Internasional.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 26, no. 2 (2014): 181–93.
Darmadi, Nanang Sri. “Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia [The Position and the Authority of the Constitutional Court in the Indonesian Constitutional Law System].” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 26, no. 2 (2017): 12287.
Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee E Preston. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1 (1995): 65–91.
Fontrodona, Joan, and Alejo José G Sison. “The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique From Philosophical Anthropology.” Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2006): 33–42.
Frecè, Jan Thomas, and Deane L Harder. “Organisations Beyond Brundtland: A Definition of Corporate Sustainability Based on Corporate Values.” Journal of Sustainable Development 11, no. 5 (2018): 184–93.
Hadistianto, Mohammad Fandrian. “Problematika Regulasi Mengenai Daluwarsa Gugatan Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Indonesia.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (2022): 1–18.
Hamid, Harlina. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tatanegara Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan-Putusan Penting.” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara 2, no. 4 (2024): 312–20.
Jensen, Michael C. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 2002, 235–56.
Lozano, Josep M. “Towards the Relational Corporation: From Managing Stakeholder Relationships to Building Stakeholder Relationships (Waiting for Copernicus).” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 5, no. 2 (2005): 60–77.
Marcus, Alfred A, and Robert S Goodman. “Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy During a Crisis.” Academy of Management Journal 34, no. 2 (1991): 281–305.
Munthe, Eunice Primsa. “Penetapan Daluwarsa Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Doktrina: Journal of Law 3, no. 2 (2020): 140–50.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern [Philosophical Study of the Concept of Justice from Classical to Modern Thinking].” Yustisia 3, no. 2 (2014).
Rouwette, Etienne, Inge Bleijenbergh, and Jac Vennix. “Group Model-Building to Support Public Policy: Addressing a Conflicted Situation in a Problem Neighbourhood.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 33, no. 1 (2016): 64–78.
Saputri, M, H K C Abigail, and M Livana. “Penerapan Teori Stakeholder Pada Praktik Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr).” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi 1, no. 4 (2024): 461.
Shim, Kyujin, and Jeong-nam Kim. “The Impacts of Ethical Philosophy on Corporate Hypocrisy Perception and Communication Intentions Toward CSR.” International Journal of Business Communication 58, no. 3 (2021): 386–409.
Siahaan, Maruarar. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 4 (2020): 729–52.
Spaak, Torben. “Meta-Ethics and Legal Theory: The Case of Gustav Radbruch.” Law and Philosophy 28, no. 3 (2009): 261–90.
Sudirman, Lu, David Tan, Winsherly Tan, and Ampuan Situmeang. “International Laws and The Reality: The Complexity of Corporate Law in Empowering Human Rights.” Jambura Law Review 6, no. 1 (2024): 1–32.
Tan, David. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosia 8, no. 8 (2021). doi:10.31604/jips.v8i8.2021.2463-2478.
Thietart, Raymond-alain, and Bernard Forgues. “Chaos Theory and Organization.” Organization Science 6, no. 1 (1995): 19–31.
Wijaya, Satya Lejar, Budi Santoso, and Edy Sismarwoto. “Pembuktian Asas Itikad Baik Dan Itikad Tidak Baik Dalam Sengketa Merek Terkenal ‘Superman’ Antara Dc Comics Melawan Pt Marxing Fam Makmur (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 29/Pdt. Sus/Merek/2019/PN NIAGA JKT. PST).” Diponegoro Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2022).
Yudhistira, Nizar, and Yuli Indrawati. “Hapusnya Hak Tagih Pemegang Obligasi Lama Terhadap Negara Ditinjau Dari UU Perbendaharaan Indonesia/Indische Comptabiliteitswet (ICW).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2859–68.
Website:
Kolkey, Karen. “Why Do We Need Corporations?,” 2019. https://www.quora.com/Why-do-we-need-corporations.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v9i1.36790
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :
 | International Journal of Law Recnstruction | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | E-ISSN 2580-9245 (Online) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 | IJLR is licensed under a |