The Credit Restructuring as a Step for Bank Financial Rescue

Liu Shang Wei

Abstract


One effort to minimize potential losses from problem loans is that banks can carry out credit restructuring. Implementing credit restructuring for problem loans means that debtors can again fulfill their obligations to the bank, namely in the form of paying principal installments and/or credit interest which has been given relief tailored to the debtor's capabilities. The result of credit restructuring is that the debtor's business continuity becomes viable again so that the debtor can fulfill his obligations to the bank. The obstacles that arose in the restructuring process were able to be overcome by the bank optimally and proportionately. The solution adopted is also a method that is profitable for both parties, so that both parties (debtor and creditor) avoid the element of loss.

Keywords


Banks; Credit; Rescue; Restructuring.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bainbridge, S. M. (1993). In defense of the shareholder wealth maximization norm: A reply to Professor Green. Washington and Lee Law Review, 50, 1423.

Carter, C. B., & Lorsch, J. W. (2004). Back to the drawing board—Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Carver, J. (2007, November). The promise of governance theory: Beyond codes and best practices. Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1030–1037.

Charan, R. (2005). Ending the CEO succession crisis. Harvard Business Review, 83(2), 72–81.

Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2002). Understanding Enron: It’s about the gatekeepers, stupid (Columbia Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 207). Business Law, 57, 1403.

Coffee, J. C., Jr. (2003a). Corporate gatekeepers: Their past, present, and future. (Duke Law School, Working Paper No. 7). Duke Law Journal, 7.

Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management Review, 7(3), 297–317.

Kaldor, M., Anheier, H., & Glasius, M. (2003). Global civil society in an era of regressive globalisation. In M. Kaldor, H. Anheier, & M. Glasius (Eds.), Global civil society 2003 (pp. 3–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keinath, A. K., & Walo, J. C. (2004, November 23). Audit committee responsibilities: Focusing on oversight, open communication, and best practices. The CPA Journal, 74(11), 22–29.

Khurana, R., & Pick, K. (2005). The social nature of boards. Brooklyn Law Review, 70(3), 1259–1285.

Lipton, M., & Savitt, W. (2007, May). The many myths of Lucian Bebchuk. Virginia Law Review, 93(3), 733.

Lorsch, J. (1995, January–February). Empowering the board. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 107–117.

Matheson, J. H., & Olson, B. A. (1992). Corporate law and the long term shareholder model of corporate governance. Minnesota Law Review, 76, 1313–1391.

Millstein, I. M., Gregory, H. J., & Grapsas, R. C. (2006, January). Six priorities for boards in 2006. Weil Briefing: Corporate Governance. New York: Wel, Gotsal & Manges.

Monks, R. A. G. (2005, March). Corporate governance—USA—fall 2004 reform—the wrong way and the right way. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 108.

Nadler, D., Behan, B., & Nadler, M. B. (2006). Building better boards: A blueprint for effective governance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Nash, J. (2008, March 28). CEO pay: Performance-based bonuses down, discretionary bonuses up in ’07. Financial Week.

National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) in collaboration with Mercer Delta Consulting. (2006). The role of the board in CEO succession. Washington, DC, and New York: Author.

Petra, S. T. (2006). Corporate governance reforms: Fact or fiction. Corporate Governance, 6(2), 107–115.

Rérolle, J.-F., & Vermeire, T. (2005, April 29). M&A best practices for boards of directors. From Houlihan, Lokey, Howard, & Zukin, Corporate Board Member Magazine, M&A /Capital Markets.

Rivero, J. C., & Nadler, D. A. (2003). Building a valuable relationship between CEOs and their boards. Mercer Management Journal.

Rose, N. & Wolfram, C. (2002). Regulating executive pay: Using the tax code to influence chief executive officer compensation. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), S138–S175.

Salwen, K. G. (1992, February 14). Shareholder groups cheer SEC’s moves on disclosure of executive compensation. Wall Street Journal, p. A-4.

Spencer Stuart, Board Services Practice. (2008). Cornerstone of the board—the nonexecutive chairman: Offering new solutions. New York: Author.

Springer, J. D. (1999). Corporate law and constituency statutes: Hollow hopes and false fears. New York University Annual Survey American Law, 122.

Stewart, J. K., & Countryman, A. (2002, February 24). Local audit conflicts add up: Consulting deals, hiring practices in question. Chicago Tribune, p. C-1.

Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004, May–June). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 350–363.

Thornton, E. (2002, January 14). The bids sure are getting hostile: Unsolicited offers are on the rise in a market ripe for consolidation. Business Week.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2004). The shift towards services. World Investment Report 2004. Geneva: Author.

Wood, D. (2005). Red flags in management culture, strategies, and practices. National Association of Corporate Directors.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v7i2.33282

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :

DOAJgoogle_scholarsintacrossrefMendeley onesearch  dimension

International Journal of Law Recnstruction  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, E-ISSN 2775-8885 (Online)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112IJLR is licensed under a