Analisis Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau Taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat

Tiafahmi Angestiwi, Feny Wahyuniati

Abstract


ABSTRACT

Monument Perjuangan Park is one of the Green Open Spaces. The location of this park is in the center of Bandung and its strategic position so that it is visited by many people, especially on Sundays. The road around the Monument Perjuangan Park is used as a special location for selling street vendors, but many traders violate the rules by selling inside the park area so that many park facilities are damaged and the management and maintenance of the park is not optimal, affecting the quality of the Monument Perjuangan Park as a green open space. This study aims to analyze the quality of Green Open Space based on aspects of accessibility, activities and facilities. This study used a descriptive analysis of the results of observations, questionnaires and documentation studies. The results of the research from the aspects of accessibility, activities and facilities are not available access for the disabled, the absence of information and directions, the unavailability of facilities to carry out play activities, the lack of conservation and biodiversity as well as some park facilities that are not functioning properly and the conditions are damaged so that the quality of the green Open Space of the Monument Perjuangan Park shows poor quality. The recommendation for the solution to solve the problems found is the planning of the development of Green Open Space assets based on aspects of facilities, activities and accessibility in the Monument Perjuangan Park.

 

Keywords: Green Open Space, quality, accessibility, activities, facilities.

 

ABSTRAK

Taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat merupakan salah satu Ruang Terbuka Hijau. Lokasi taman ini berada di pusat kota Bandung dan posisinya yang strategis sehingga banyak dikunjungi masyarakat terutama pada hari Minggu. Jalan di sekitar taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat dijadikan lokasi khusus untuk berjualan pedagang kaki lima, namun banyak pedagang yang melanggar aturan dengan berjualan di dalam area taman sehingga banyak fasilitas taman yang rusak serta pengelolaan dan pemeliharaan taman yang tidak optimal sehingga mempengaruhi kualitas taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat sebagai ruang terbuka hijau. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas Ruang Terbuka Hijau berdasarkan aspek aksesibilitas, aktivitas dan fasilitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif dari hasil observasi, kuesioner dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian dari aspek aksesibilitas, aktivitas dan fasilitas yaitu tidak tersedia akses untuk difabel, tidak adanya informasi dan petunjuk arah, tidak tersedianya fasilitas untuk melakukan aktivitas bermain, kurangnya konservasi dan keanakaragaman hayati serta beberapa fasilitas taman yang tidak berfungsi dengan baik dan kondisi yang rusak sehingga kualitas Ruang Terbuka hijau taman Monumen perjuangan Rakyat menunjukan kualitas yang tidak baik. Rekomendasi solusi untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan yang ditemukan adalah perencanaan pengembangan aset Ruang Terbuka Hijau berdasarkan aspek fasilitas, aktivitas dan aksesibilitas di taman Monumen Perjuangan Rakyat Jawa Barat.

Kata Kunci : Ruang Terbuka Hijau, kualitas, aksesibilitas, aktivitas, fasilitas.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelhamid,M Mona. (2020). Improving urban park usability in developing countries: Case study of Al-Shalalat Park in Alexandria. Alexandria Engineering Journal.

Abrams, R. F., Malizia, E., Wendel, A., Sallis, J., Millstein, R. A., Carlson, J. A., ... & Thompson, S. (2012). Making healthy places: designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability. Island Press.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bailey, S. J. (1995). Publik sector economics: theory, policy and practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Bell, Shannon Elizabeth, and Yvonne A. Braun. "Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central Appalachia." Gender & Society 24.6 (2010): 794-813.

Bell,Jhon.( 2017) . Life Sciences Industrial Strategy – A report to the Government from the life sciences sector. Oxford: Medicine, University of Oxford.

Benenson, I., & Torrens, P. (2004). Geosimulation: Automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. John Wiley & Sons.

Blanchard, B. S., dan W. J. Fabrycky. (1990). System Engineering and Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Boone,Louise. (2013). Contemporary Marketing. Alabama : Cengage Learning

Bottoms (2021). Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Atlanta:Department Of Parks And Recreation.

Brinkman, K., Smeitink, J. A., Romijn, J. A., & Reiss, P. (1999). Mitochondrial toxicity induced by nucleoside-analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors is a key factor in the pathogenesis of antiretroviral-therapy-related lipodystrophy. The Lancet, 354(9184), 1112-1115.

Byrne, D. and Uprichard, E. (2012) ‘Useful complex causality’, in Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, Kinkard, H. (ed), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109-129.

Byrne, J., Wolch, J. and Zhang, J., 2009. Planning for environmental justice in an urban national park? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(3),365–392.

Campbell. (2011). Asset Management Excellence. CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business: United States of America.

Carmona, M. Tiesdell, S. Heath, T. Oc. Taner. (2013). Publik Places, Urban Spaces: The Aspekons of Urban Design. USA: Architectural Press.

Carr, Stephen et all. 1992. Publik Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chan,Chung_Sing.(2018).Indicator development for sustainable urban park management in Hong Kong. Journal Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 31, 1-14.

Chen et al., (2017). On the effectiveness of recession analysis methods for capturing the characteristic storage-discharge relation: An intercomparison study. New Orleans, Louisiana.American Geophysical Union.

Chiari, C. G., and Seeland, K. (2004). Are Urban Spaces Optimally Distributed to Act as Places for Social Integration? Result of a Geographical Information System (GIS) Approach for Urban Forestry Research. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (1): 3-13.

Creswell, John W. (2012). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Crisp, P., Heywood, J., & Steen, G. (2002). Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and literature, 11(1), 55-69.

Currie’s. (2017). A Design Framework for Small Parks in Ultra-Urban, Metropolitan, Sub urban, and Small Town Settings,NewYork: The Journal of Urban Design in volume (22).

Cvejić, R., Eler, K., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., & Strohbach, M. (2017). A Typology of Urban Green Spaces, Ecosystem Services Provisioning Services and Demands. 10.

De Chiara, J., and Koppelman, L. (1975). Urban Planning and Design Criteria, 2nd Edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Dwiyanto, Agus (Ed.). 2008. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Francis, Mark (1987). Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design. New York : Universuty of California.

Ghozali, Imam. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Yogyakarta: Universitas Diponegoro

Giles-Corti, B., M. H. Broomhall, M. Knuiman, C. Collins, K. Douglas, K. Ng, A. Lange, and R. J. Donovan. (2005). Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of publik open space? American Journal of Preventative Medicine 28(2 Suppl 2):169-176.

Grahn, Patrik, and Ulrika A. Stigsdotter. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban forestry & urban greening .2.1. 1-18.

Hakim, C. (1998). Developing a sociology for the twenty-first century: Preference Theory. The British journal of sociology, 49(1), 137-143.

Haq SM. Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. J Environ Protect. 2011;2(5):601–608.

Harnick P.(2000). Inside City Parks. Trust for Publik Land : Washington, DC

Hasting. (2010). Physical aseet Manajemen. Australia. Springer London Dordrecht Heidelberg.

Herzele, Van A dan Wiedemann, T. (2003). A Monitoring Tool For The Provision Of Accessible And Attractive Urban Green Spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning. 63: 109–126.

Kaczynsky. (2008). Association of Park Size, Distance, and Features With Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks. American Journal of publik health.

Konijnendijk. (2013). Benefits of Urban Parks. Copenhagen & Alnarp. IFPRA.

Kothencz, G., Kolcsár, R., Cabrera-Barona, P., & Szilassi, P. (2017). Urban green space perception and its contribution to well-being. International journal of environmental research and publik health, 14(7), 766.

Krier, R., & Rowe, C. (1979). Urban space (p. 17). London: Academy editions.

Krier,Leon. (1992). Architecture and Urban Design. Washington DC: Academy Editions.

Levit, Noel.(2014). Satisfaction-Priorities Surveys Interpretive Guide. Coralville, Iowa:LCC

Malek., Manohar., Mustafa. (2012). The making of a quality neighbourhood park: a path model approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 49 (2012) 202 – 214

Macedo.Joseli,Monica A hadad. (2015). Equitable Distribution of Open Space:Using Spatial Analysis to Evaluate Urban Parks in Curitiba,Brazil.USA..SAGE.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Mollentze, T. I. (2005). Factors determining the profitability of a commercial enterprise at a higher educational institution (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).

Mollentze. (2005). Asset Management. Auditing.Master Thesis.Universyty of Pretroria.

Parida.(2011).Asset Performance Assessment. Switzerland Springer Science,Business Media B.V.

Pataki DE, Carreiro MM, Cherrier J, et al. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Front Ecol Environ. 2011;9(1):27–36. [Google Scholar]

Rehdanz. (2015). The role of urban green space for human well-being, issue C. Germany.Christian Albrechts Universitat Zu Kiel. vol. 120, 139-152.

Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Gree. 2012;11(4):351–363.

Scruton, R. (1984). Publik space and the classical vernacular. The Publik Interest, 74, 5.

Siregar. (2004). Management Asset Strategi Penataan Konsep Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Secara Nasional dalam Konteks Kepala Daerah Sebagai CE.

Stoner. A.F. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Strohbach MW, Arnold E, Haase D. The carbon footprint of urban green space – a life cycle approach. Landscape Urban Plan. 2012;104(2):220–229.

Sugiama, A Gima. (2008). Metode Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, Bandung : Guardaya Intimarta.

Sugiama. A Gima. (2013). The Synergistic Model of Quality Service Design of Green Open Space Asset Through QFD. Bandung. Politeknik Negeri Bandung.

Sugiama. A Gima.(2013). Manajemen Aset Pariwisata. Bandung: Guardaya Intimarta.

Sugiyono.( 2010). Statistik untuk Pendidikan.Bandung: Alfabeta

Sugiyono.(2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.

Sugyono.(2012). Memahami penelitian kualititaif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sunyoto. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama Anggota Ikapi.

Supranto. (200)7. Teknik Sampling untuk Survey dan Eksperimen. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Suyoto, S., & Sodik, M. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.

Takyi.Stephen. (2016). Adaptive management in sustainable park planning and management: case study of the city of Vancouver Park.Canada. Journal of Urban Ecology,1-15

Talen E .(1998). Visualizing fairness: Equity maps for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 22–38.

Talen E and Anselin L .(1996). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to publik playgrounds. Environment and Planning A 30: 595–613.

Talen E.(2003). Neighborhoods as service providers: A methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 181–200.

Tate A .2001. Great City Parks. London: Spon Press.

Terry, D. J. (1994). Determinants of coping: the role of stable and situational factors. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 895.

Ummeh. (2017). Classification of Urban Parks and their Regional Characteristics in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B 6 (2017) 41-54. David Publishing

Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and urban planning, 63(2), 109-126.

Verma, D., Chilakapati, R., & Fabrycky, W. J. (1998). Analyzing a quality function deployment matrix: An expert system-based approach to identify inconsistencies and opportunities. Journal of Engineering Design, 9(3), 252-262.

Young RF. Managing municipal green space for ecosystem services. Urban For Urban Gree. 2010;9(4):313–321.

Zorn, T. G., Seelbach, P. W., & Rutherford, E. S. (2012). A Regionalâ€Scale Habitat Suitability Model to Assess the Effects of Flow Reduction on Fish Assemblages in Michigan Streams 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(5), 871-895.

Sumber Normatif

Republik Indonesia. 2007. Undang-Undang RI Nomor 26 tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang.Jakarta: Pemerintah Pusat

Menteri Pekerjaan Umum. 2008. Permen PU No. 5/PRT/M/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jakarta:Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jkr.v2i2.26530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.