The Juridical Implications for Violating the Contents of the Peace Deed Made by the Parties before a Notary in the Conception of Legal Certainty
Abstract
The settlement of disputes or cases is largely inseparable from the method of settlement through trials in court. However, in reality, disputes or cases that have been filed in court often receive complaints from the public, one of which is a very long settlement process. Therefore there are many ways to resolve disputes outside the courtroom, one of which is through mediation by reconciling the two parties by making peace deed. This research was conducted to find out and analyze the contents of the peace deed according to the concept of legal certainty and the legal consequences for those who violate the contents of the deed. The method used by the author in this thesis research is a normative legal research method using the statutory approach as the basic basis for research and analysis based on literature and other scientific works. The results of the discussion of the thesis research based on the formulation of the problem listed by the author explain that the deed of reconciliation made by a notary outside the court still has the force of law and legal certainty as well as the power of a judge's decision which cannot be changed if the deed has been registered in the form of a lawsuit so that if in the future there are violations committed by one of the parties, the power of the deed cannot be denied anymore and has permanent legal force and cannot be appealed or cassation against it. As well as for violations committed by one of the parties. Keywords: Case; Deed; Notary; Peace.References
Journals:
Aga Waskitha dan Wiryawan, Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Lex Renaissance. Vol 5. Nomor (1).
Mahyuni, 2009. Lembaga Damai Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan, Jurnal Hukum No. 4 Vol. 16
Rizki Amalia, 2001. “Pertanggung jawaban Notaris terhadap Isi Akta Autentik yang Tidak Sesuai dengan Faktaâ€, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 24, No. 1
Wanis Aisyah Oktavia, 2019. “Kedudukan Akta Dan Akibat Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Rangkap Jabatanâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad. Volume 3, Nomor 1.
Books:
Bambang Waluyo, 1996. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Jakarta: Sinar Gafika.
Habib Adjie, 2008. Hukum Notaris Indonesia; Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Lexy J. Moleong, 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
R. Subekti, 2008. Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Retnowulan Sutantio, 2003. Mediasi dan Dading, Proceedings Arbitrase dan Mediasi, (a) cet. 1, Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Supriadi, 2008, Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Yahya Harahap, 2006. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.