Criminal Liability of Notaries Who Participate in Forgery of Deeds of Power of Attorney to Sell

Bunyan Nirwana

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of Notaries who participated in the forgery of Power of Attorney to Sell Deeds and the legal certainty of the deeds that were the objects of forgery. The study uses a normative juridical approach with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. Legal materials were obtained through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the criminal liability of Notaries can be imposed based on proven individual actions and errors. The actions in the case studied were assessed based on Article 264 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) point 1 of the Criminal Code which was in effect at the time the act was committed, while Article 391, Article 392, and Article 20 of Law Number 1 of 2023 were used as a study of national legal developments. The criminalization of Notaries does not immediately cause Power of Attorney to Sell Deeds Numbers 53, 54, 55, and 58 to be null and void. The four deeds still exist as documents, but their authentic evidentiary power regarding the appearance and signing cannot be maintained. The legal consequences of the Sale and Purchase Deed and the recording of the transfer of land rights must be resolved through civil and land law mechanisms.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Fauzi, Ailina Rahmanita, Iin Khaeriyatun Ni’mah, dan Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Concept of Criminal Liability of Notary Law in Deed Making Based on Perjury.” Jurnal Akta, Vol. 6, No. 4, Desember 2019, hlm. 675–682.

Muljono, Bambang Eko. “Pelaksanaan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dan Kuasa untuk Menjual yang Dibuat oleh Notaris.” Jurnal Independent, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2013, hlm. 59–70.

Saputra, Denny dan Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian bagi Notaris/PPAT dalam Menjalankan Tupoksinya dalam Upaya Pencegahan Kriminalisasi Berdasarkan Kode Etik.” Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4, No. 3, September 2017, hlm. 347–354.

Books:

Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2018.

Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Buku Kedua. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2013.

Lamintang, P.A.F. dan Theo Lamintang. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Soesilo, R. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana: Peraturan Umum dan Delik-Delik Khusus. Bogor: Politeia, 1991.

Subekti. Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995.

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1990.

Wahyuningsih, Sri Endah. Prinsip-Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana Islam dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2013.

Regulation:

Civil Code of the Republic of Indonesia (Burgerlijk Wetboek van Indonesia);

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning of the National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) Number 16 of 2021 concerning the third amendment to Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 3 of 1997 concerning Land Registration

Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia;

Law Number 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Formation of Legislation;

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary;


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.