Legal Consequences of Sale and Purchase Deeds Made by Unregistered Land Deed (PPAT) Officers at the Land Office
Abstract
The transfer of land rights must be proven by an authentic deed made by a PPAT as a guarantee of legal certainty, as stipulated in Article 40 paragraph (1) of PP 24/1997 which requires PPATs to submit sales and purchase deeds along with supporting documents to the Land Office no later than seven working days after signing. However, in practice, PPAT negligence still occurs, so this normative legal research, using a statutory and theoretical approach and using secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzes the status of PPAT deeds and the legal consequences of delays in registration. The results of the study indicate that PPAT deeds still have strong legitimacy and qualify as authentic deeds with perfect evidentiary power, although the regulatory norms need to be strengthened to be equal to other authentic deeds. Sales and Purchase Deeds are valid as evidence of transfer of rights, but obtain full legal force after registration; so that delays in submitting the deed can reduce legal protection for buyers, although buyers can still take civil suits to obtain an inkracht decision as a basis for registration and legal certainty.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Baharudin. 2014. “Kewenangan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah.” Keadilan Progresif, Vol. 5 No. 1, hlm. 88–97.
Fatmawati Parenrengi & Febby Mutiara Nelson. 2022. “Tanggung Jawab PPAT terhadap Keterlambatan Pendaftaran Akta ke Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Jurnal Kajian Sentralis, Vol. 10 No. 12, hlm. 2835.
Mega Mentari, et al. 2020. “Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara (PPATS) terhadap Batas Waktu Pendaftaran Akta Jual Beli Tanah.” Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 9 No. 2, hlm. 1–15.
Sari, N. R. & Wibowo, A. 2024. “Analisis Kewenangan dan Akibat Pembatalan Akta PPAT dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol. 54 No. 3, hlm. 589–605.
Books:
Adjie, Habib. 2013. Menilai Pembuktian Akta Notaris. Diakses melalui
Hadjon, Philipus M. 1987. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Harsono, Boedi. 2005. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan UUPA, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Hartanto, Andy. 2014. Hukum Pertanahan: Karakteristik Jual Beli Tanah yang Belum Terdaftar Hak Atas Tanahnya. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia.
Ibrahim, Johnny. 2005. Teori Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Kelsen, Hans. 2017. Teori Hukum Murni (Reine Rechtslehre). Terjemahan Raisul Muttaqien. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Marpi, Yapiter. 2020. Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Tasikmalaya: PT Zona Media Mandiri.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 1998. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Subekti. 2001. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Agraria. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sumardjono. 2019. Reformasi dan Tata Kelola Pertanahan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Agraria.
Supriadi. 2010. Hukum Agraria. Cetakan ke-4. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sutedi, Andrian. 2014. Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Pendaftarannya. Cetakan ke-6. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Syahrani, Riduan. 1999. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Internet:
https://habibadjie.dosennarotama.ac.id/files/2013/07/Menilai-Pembuktian-Akta-Notaris.pdf acceesed on 3 October 2025.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.