Evaluation of Risks and Their Impact on Legal Validity in the Implementation of Electronic Notary Deeds in Indonesia

Citra Nuriska, Nanang Sri Darmadi

Abstract


This study aims to analyze: 1). The risks that arise in the implementation of electronic notarial deeds in Indonesia. 2) The impact of these risks on the legal validity of electronic notarial deeds according to the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia. This type of research is normative legal research. The approach method in this study is a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The type of data in this study is secondary data sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method uses literature studies. The analysis in this study is prescriptive. The results of the study concluded: 1). The implementation of electronic notarial deeds in Indonesia, based on Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary, faces cybersecurity risks (hacking, wiretapping, data loss), legal (unclear regulations, non-compliance with the principle of onmiddellijkheid), technical-operational (lack of notary competence, unstable infrastructure) and socio-ethical (misuse of electronic signatures). This risk violates Article 26 and 31 of the ITE Law, Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the Notary Law, Article 1867 and 1868 of the Civil Code, and Article 46 and 59 paragraph (3) of the PP PSTE, thus threatening the validity of deeds as authentic evidence and public trust. Solutions include regulatory harmonization, implementation of encryption and blockchain, Notary training, infrastructure investment and electronic signature certification to ensure legal certainty in accordance with Article 28 D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. 2). Cybersecurity risks (hacking, wiretapping, data loss), legal (unclear regulations, non-compliance with the principle of onmiddellijkheid), technical-operational (lack of Notary competence, unstable infrastructure) and socio-ethical (misuse of electronic signatures) threaten the validity of electronic Notary deeds. This risk violates Article 26 and 31 of the ITE Law, Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the Notary Law, Articles 1867, 1868 and 1869 of the Civil Code, and Articles 46 and 59 paragraph (3) of the PP PSTE, causing the deed to be at risk of losing its authentic status and not being recognized in court. The inconsistency of subordinate norms with the grundnorm of Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution creates a hierarchical contradiction. Harmonization of regulations, cybersecurity, notary training, infrastructure investment and electronic signature certification are needed so that electronic deeds are equivalent to authentic deeds.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Ariy Yandillah, et al., (2015), “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Terkait Pembuatan Akta Notaris Yang Merugikan Para Pihak Akibat Kelalaiannya,” Jurnal Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.

Eman Sulaiman, Nur Arifudin, dan Lily Triyana, (2020), “Kekuatan Hukum Digital Signature Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Ditinjau Dari Hukum Acara Perdata,” Risalah Hukum, Vol. 16 No. 2.

Erina Permatasari dan Lathifah Hanim, (2017), “Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Online,” Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4 No. 3.

Fabela Rahma Monetery dan Budi Santoso, (2023), “Keabsahan dan Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Akta Notaris: Perspektif Cyber Notary di Indonesia,” Notarius, Vol. 16 No. 2.

Faisal Santiago, (2013), “Peranan Notaris dalam Transaksi Saham pada Pasar Modal di Bursa Efek Jakarta,” Jurnal Constitutum, Vol. 12 No. 2.

Faza Irfan, (2024), “Urgensi Pembaharuan Cyber Notary Dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan Perkembangan Teknologi,” Notarius, Vol. 17 No. 1.

Gana Prajogo, Lydi Ratu Setia Permata, dan Muhammad Fernando, (2021), “Autentikasi Akta Partij dalam Digital Signature oleh Notaris,” Indonesian Notary Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2.

Rina Yulianti, (2018), “Asas Kenotariatan dalam Era Digital,” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 3 No. 1.

Selva Omiyani, (2023), “Digitalisasi Tandatangan Elektronik pada Akta Notaris,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, Vol. 8 No. 4.

Sujanayasa dan Ariawan, (2016), “Kedudukan Saksi Instrumentair,” Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 1 No. 2.

Tiara Sanitra, (2019), “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dan Akibat Hukum Pengesahan Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol. 4 No. 1.

Yudha Pratama, (2020), “Sengketa Hukum dalam Transaksi Elektronik,” Jurnal Hukum dan Teknologi, Vol. 4 No. 2.

Yudha Pratama, (2021), “Tantangan Hukum Teknologi dalam Kenotariatan,” Jurnal Hukum dan Teknologi, Vol. 7 No. 3.

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, (2009), Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.

Andi Prajitno, (2015), Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia (Sesuai UUJN Nomor 2 Tahun 2014), Surabaya: Perwira Media Nusantara.

Djuhad Mahja, (2005), Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Jakarta: Durat Bahagia.

Edmon Makarim, (2013), Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kajian Hukum tentang Cybernotary atau Electronic Notary, ed. ke-2, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Emma Nurita dan Raden Ayu, (2012), Cyber Notary: Pemahaman Awal Dalam Konsep Pemikiran, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Putri A.R, (2011), Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris (Indikator Tugas-Tugas Jabatan Notaris yang Berimplikasi Perbuatan Pidana), Medan: Softmedia.

Surya Jaya, (2012), Cyberspace (Problematika dan Antisipasi Pengaturannya), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Tan Thong Kie, (2010), Studi Notariat dan Serba-Serbi Praktik Notaris, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tan Thong Kie, (2017), Studi Notariat, Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Teguh Prasetyo, (2020), Hukum dan Teknologi: Menjawab Tantangan Dunia Digital, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution.

Civil Code (KUHPerdata).

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to the Law concerning the Position of Notary.

Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.

Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 4 of 2022 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Certificates within the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.