The Role of a Notary in the Implementation of Credit Agreements and Settlement of Defaults with a Mortgage Right Guarantee
Abstract
Abstract. This study aims to analyze the role of notaries in resolving defaults in credit agreements with collateral rights related to Supreme Court Decision Number 42 PK/TUN/2021. and to analyze the obstacles faced by notaries in resolving defaults in credit agreements with collateral rights related to Supreme Court Decision Number 42 PK/TUN/2021 and their solutions. This study uses a normative juridical research approach. The specifications in this study are descriptive analysis. The theories used include the theory of authority and the theory of legal certainty. Based on the research, it is concluded that the role of notaries who also serve as Land Deed Officials (PPAT) in resolving defaults in credit agreements with collateral rights, as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 42 PK/TUN/2021. Notaries not only play a role in making authentic deeds such as sales and purchase deeds and deeds of granting mortgage rights, but also bear preventive legal responsibility to ensure that the collateral object is truly valid both formally and materially. Repressive aspects, Notaries play a role in providing information or becoming expert witnesses in court when the validity of authentic deeds they have made is questioned. Failure by notaries to implement the principle of prudence, such as not verifying land status, physical ownership, or potential disputes, can result in the issuance of legally flawed deeds and lead to the cancellation of mortgage rights and the loss of the bank's preferential rights as a creditor. (2) Internal obstacles include negligence on the part of banks that accept Land Ownership Certificates (SHM) without conducting due diligence, as well as weak integrity and professional ethics from notaries/PPATs who do not verify the validity of the collateral object thoroughly. External obstacles come from the BPN which is negligent in verifying the physical and legal status of the land before issuing SHM, as well as from customers who deliberately hide information about the status of disputes or unclear ownership history of the land used as collateral. Solutions include joint checks on the collateral object by banks, notaries/PPATs, and debtors; strengthening ethical guidance and supervision by professional organizations for notaries/PPATs; strict internal audits at the BPN before issuing certificates; as well as legal education to customers regarding the importance of transparency and validity of guarantee documents.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Arsyilla Destriana dan Tiurma Mangihut Pitta Allagan. (2022), "Peran Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Administrasi Pertanahan Melalui Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik." Palar (Pakuan Law Review), Vol. 8. No. 1
Christina Tri Budhayati. (2018). Jaminan Kepastian Kepemilikan Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Menurut UUPA. Vol. 2, No. 2
Denico Doly, (2011), Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta yang berhubungan dengan Tanah, Negara Hukum, Vol 2, No. 2
Deny Fernaldi Chastra, (2021), Kepastian Hukum Cyber Notary Dalam Kaidah Pembuatan Akta Autentik Oleh Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Indonesian Notary, Vol. 3, Issue 3
Mira Novana Ardani. (2019), Tantangan pelaksanaan kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap dalam rangka mewujudkan pemberian kepastian hukum. Gema Keadilan, Vol. 6. No. 3
Muktar Muktar & Amir Machmud, (2022), Tanggung Gugat Notaris Atas Kelalaian Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Kredit Bank, Jurnal Justice Aswaja, Vol. 1, No. 1
Pramono, Dedy. (2015), Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta yang Dibuat oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, Vol. 12, No. 3
Risma Wati Sitompul dkk, (2022), Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan, Jurnal Rectum, Vol. 4, No. 1
Rocky Samuel Palantung, (2021), Prosedur Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Melalui Jual Beli Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997, Lex Privatum, Vol. IX, No. 6, May
Books:
Soerjono Soekanto. (1981), Pengatar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : UI Press
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.