Practice of Making Notarial Deeds in Cases of Appearing at Different Times and Places and the Legal Consequences

Khoirun Nisa

Abstract


The practice of making notarial deeds in the case of the parties appearing at different times and places will have legal consequences for the deeds made. The legal consequences in question are related to the evidentiary power of the deed made, whether it has the evidentiary power as an authentic deed or not, or in other words, whether the notarial deed is legally valid. Based on the background of the problem, this study discusses the practice of making notarial deeds in the case of the parties appearing at different times and places and its legal consequences. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the practice of making deeds in the case of the parties appearing at different times and places and its legal consequences. This study uses a sociological legal approach. Data collection was carried out through interviews, literature studies and documentation studies. Data analysis was carried out descriptively qualitatively. This study shows that the practice of making deeds in the case of the parties appearing at different times and placesas determined by laws and regulations as a form of deviation from the making of deeds due to the demands of the development of the times. This happens because the time owned by the parties is limited and/or an interest that cannot be abandoned so that for reasons of practicality the parties appear at different times and places when making the deed. This cannot be separated from the mutual trust between the parties so that the management of making the deed is handed over to one of the parties. Such practices are a breakthrough effort against the obstacles that arise in making deeds so that the effectiveness of making deeds can be realized.The legal consequences of making a deed in the event that the parties appear at different times and places include the legal consequences for the authentic deed and the legal consequences for the notary. The legal consequences for the deed are that the deed in question remains valid as an authentic deed if the makingThe deed is executed at the notary's domicile and the reading and signing of the deed is done in the presence of the parties witnessed by at least or at least 2 (two) witnesses, except in cases where the parties wish that the deed in question not be read. If this is not fulfilled or the deed is signed at a different time and place, then the deed in question is degraded in its legal force to become a private deed. The legal consequences for the notary arise in the event that the deed in question is degraded in its legal force as a private deed, then the notary can be subject to administrative sanctions in the form ofwritten warning, temporary dismissal, honorable dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal. Notaries can be held civilly liable in the form of compensation and criminally liable in the form of criminal sanctions in the event that an authentic deed that is degraded into a private deed causes losses to other parties.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

GHS. Lumban Tobing, 1999, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Erlangga, Jakatrta.

Habib Adjie, 2009, Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Jazim Hamidi, 2006, Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Konstitusi Press & Citra Media, Yogyakarta.

Komar Andasasmita, 1983, Notaris II, Sumur, Bandung.

M. Natsir Asnawi, 2013, Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata di Indonesia, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Marwan Mas, 2003, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2008, Penelitian Hukum. Kencana, Jakarta.

P. Joko Subagyo, 1997. Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Sabian Usman, 2009, Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi, Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.

Subekti, 1979, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1993, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Edisi Keempat, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Teguh Samudra, 2012, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Acara Perdata, Alumni, Bandung.

Victor M. Situmorang dan Cormentyna Sitanggang, 1993, Gross Akta dalam Pembuktian dan Eksekusi, Rinika Cipta, Jakarta.

Zuchri Abdussamad, 2021, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, CV Syakir Medis Press, Makasar.

Legislation

Law Number 30 of 2004 Concerning the Position of Notary

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 Concerning the Position of Notary.

Journal:

Lorika Cahaya Intan, “Akibat Pelanggaran oleh Notaris terhadap Pembuatan Akta Notariil”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, Vol.7, No.2 December 2016.

Internet:

Amrullah Sidik, 2015, Alat Bukti dalam hukum Acara Perdata, https://amrullahsidik.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/alat-bukti-dalam-hukum-acara-perdata/,

Arief Rachman, 2011, Otentisitas Akta Otentik, https://notarisarief.wordpress.com/2011/05 /15/otentisitas-suatu-akta-otentik/,

Habib Adjie, Akta Notaris Secara Sirkuler, http://rkhba.com/article/189037/akta-notaris-secara-sirkuler.html,

Hadi Suwignyo, 2009, Keabsahan Cap Jempol Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik, http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/1126/910,

Idris Aly Fahmi, Analisis Yuridis Degradasi Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris Menurut Pasal 84 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/41438-ID-analisis-yuridis-degradasi-kekuatan-pembuktian-dan-pembatalan-akta-notaris-menur.pdf, accessed on 20 September 2024


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.