Legal Power of Making a Statement of Validity and Truth of Documents in Electronic Mortgage Registration

Nunik Kustianingih

Abstract


Electronic Mortgage Certificates have become digitalization in electronic mortgage registration where in today's developments all processes will switch to electronic or digital, one of which is in making a statement of validity and truth of documents in electronic mortgage registration according to article 10 paragraph 4 of the regulation of the Minister of ATR / BPN number 5 of 2020. This study aims to determine and analyze the Legal Power of Making a Statement of Validity and Truth of Documents in Electronic Mortgage Registration. This study uses perspective research with a normative legal research type. This research was conducted with a theoretical approach and a legislative approach to obtain secondary data sourced from primary, secondary, tertiary legal materials obtained through literature studies to strengthen secondary data. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the first is the procedure and legal basis for making a statement of the validity and truth of documents in electronic mortgage registration that is in accordance with Article 10 paragraph 2 of the Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 5 of 2020 which explains that the cover letter of the validity and truth of documents issued by the PPAT is mandatory and is the responsibility of the PPAT and must be signed on a stamp and stamped by the PPAT, the second is the Legal Force Regarding the Making of a Statement of the Validity and Truth of Documents in Electronic Mortgage Registration will only have legally binding force and the power of proof is equivalent to an authentic deed if its truth is recognized by others.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arif Setiawan, Muhammad,(2019), “Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Pengakuan di Dalam Dan di Luar Persidangan Perkara Sengketa Tanah Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I A Palembang”, Palembang, Skripsi, Program Studi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Diane Prihastuti, (2020),”Akuntabilitas Kementerian ATR/BPN Terhadap Sertifikasi Kepemilikan Tanah Masyarakat”, Jurnal Pemulihan Hukum, 3.1

Farida Indrati S Maria, (2007), “Ilmu Perundang-undangan (Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan)”, Yogya: Kanisius.

Fatmawati, Dinar, (2021), Analisis Heurmeunitika Good Governance Dalam Layanan Publik Terhadap Perkaban ATR/BPN Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 Tentang Standart Pelayanan Dan Pengaturan Pertanahan’, (Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi), Vol.2.5.

https://blog.justika.com/dokumen-bisnis/landasan-hukum-surat-pernyataan/ diakses pada 13 Agustus 2024 Pukul 12.00 WIB

https://blog.privy.id/contoh-surat-pernyataan-keabsahan-dokumen/

https://eap-lawyer.com/apakah-surat-pernyataan-dapat-dijadikan-sebagai-bukti/

Makarim, Edmon, (2004), Kompilasi Hukum Telematika, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Ngadino, (2019), Ketentuan Umum Tata Cara Pembuatan dan Pengisian Akta PPAT, Semarang, UPT Penerbit Universitas PGRI Semarang Press.

Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang /Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik.

Rianty Elza, SH, MH, (2021), “Saya Mau Buat Surat Pernyataan, Haruskah ada Saksi dan Bermaterai”, Artikel detiknews, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5803025/saya-mau-buat-surat-pernyataan-haruskah-ada-saksi-dan-meterai/2

Roffilah, Meiyona Ulfa dan Shaleh, Ali Ismail, (2022), “Pertanggungjawaban PPAT terhadap Pembuatan Surat Pernyataan Keabsahan dan Kebenaran Dokumen Elektronik”, Jurnal Hukum Bonum Commune” No 1 Vol 5,

Rossalina, Zainatun, (2016), Keabsahan Akta Notaris yang Menggunakan Cyber Notary sebagai Akta Otentik, Malang, Brawijaya Law Student Journal.

Septanti Anggi Tamamia, Khoidin Muhammad, & Ali Muhammad, 2023, “Penyimpanan Asli Lembar Kedua Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan Setelah Berlakunya Hak Tanggungan Elektronik”, Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik 5, no. 2, hal 178, https://jurnalequivalent.id/index.php/jequi/article/view/154. Diakses pada 01 Agustus 2024 pukul 12.00 WIB

Sjahputra Iman, (2002), Problematika Hukum Internet Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo.

Wartini, Sri, (2007), Implementasi Prinsip Kehati-hatian Dalam Sanitary and Phythosanitary Agreement, Studi Kasus: Keputusan Appellate Body WTO Dalam Kasus Hormone Beef Antara Uni Eropa Dengan Amerika Serikat, Jurnal Hukum Vol.14 No.2,


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.