Analysis of the Role and Responsibilities of Notaries in Storing Minutes of Deeds

Nisrina Febriani

Abstract


Notaries have an obligation to store and maintain the minutes of the deeds they make, explained in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b UUJN which states that Notaries have an obligation to make deeds in the form of minutes and also store them as Notary protocols. The purpose of this study is to find out, understand, study, and analyze the Notary's responsibility in his obligation to store deeds and the Legal Consequences of the Notary's responsibility in storing the minutes if there is negligence in storing them, such as damaged or lost deeds. The research method used in this study uses a normative legal approach method. The research specifications used are descriptive analytical. The types of data used consist of two data, namely primary data and secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and secondary legal materials. The data collection method used is literature study and document study. This study uses a qualitative data analysis method. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Notary's responsibility in his obligation to store the minutes of the deed, the notary as a public official has an obligation in carrying out his position, one of which is to store the minutes of the deed. It is explained in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b UUJN which states that notaries are required to make a deed in the form of minutes of the deed and store it as a notary protocol which is a follow-up to the provisions in Article 15 paragraph (1) UUJN. Then the legal consequences of the Notary's responsibility in storing the minutes if there is negligence in storing such as a damaged or lost deed, namely that administrative sanctions can be imposed. As stated in Article 16 paragraph (11) that the sanctions are in the form of: written warnings, temporary dismissal, honorable dismissal and dishonorable dismissal. In addition, there are not only administrative sanctions, but there are also civil sanctions and criminal sanctions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adjie, H. (2013). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Amiruddin, A., & Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ashshofa, B. (2000). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gemilang, K. (2009). Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Jabatan Notaris dan PPAT. Jakarta: Indonesia Legal Center Publishing.

H.R., R. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hamzah, A. (2005). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Ibrahim, J. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Surabaya: Bayumedia Publishing.

Kelsen, H. (2007). General Theory of Law & State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif-Empirik Alih Bahasa oleh Soemardi. Jakarta: Bee Media Indonesia.

Kie, T. T. (2000). Studi Notariat (Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris). Jakarta: PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.

Manan, B. (2001). Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Manan, B. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2010). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sanusi, A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Saputra, A. D. (2008). Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang, dan di Masa Datang. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sjaifurrachman, S., & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Jakarta: CV Mandar Maju.

Soekanto, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umar, H. (2013). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: Rajawali Persada.

Halim, A. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Menjaga Minuta Akta. Jurnal Ilmiah Fenomena, 20(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.36841/fenomena.v20i2.2402

Imani, A. M., & Yunanto, Y. (2022). Kewajiban Serta Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Pelaksanaan Protokol Notaris dan Penyimpanan Minuta Akta. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(12), 18212–18221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i12.10842

Kustini, N. I. (2011). Experiential Marketing, Emotional Branding, and Brand Trust and their Effect on Loyalty on Honda Motorcycle Product. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 14(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v14i1.12

Manan, B. (2000). Wewenang Propinsi, Kabupaten, dan Kota dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah. Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Wllayah Dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Di Kawasan Pesisir, 4–5. Bandung.

Marbun, A. P. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Yuridis Notaris dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta. Media Bina Ilmiah, 18(2), 345–356. Retrieved from https://binapatria.id/index.php/MBI/article/view/605

Saputra, D., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). Prinsip Kehati-hatian Bagi Notaris/PPAT dalam Menjalankan Tupoksinya dalam Upaya Pencegahan Kriminalisasi berdasarkan Kode Etik. Jurnal Akta, 4(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i3.1807


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.