Legal Analysis of Legal Consequences for Notaries for Violating the Honorarium Provisions in Making Deeds

Ilham Dwi Jayanto

Abstract


This study aims to determine the determination of the Notary's honorarium in making a Deed and to determine the legal consequences for Notaries who violate the honorarium provisions in making a Deed. The research approach method used in this thesis is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this study is the Legislation (statute approach). The type of data used in this study is primary data which includes the 1945 Constitution; Civil Code; Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning amendments to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary; Notary Code of Ethics. The data analysis method used is secondary data that has been obtained, analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study show that the determination of the notary's honorarium in making a Deed is based on the Economic Value and/or Sociological Value of each Deed made. The Economic Value of each deed has been regulated in Article 36 paragraph (3) of the UUJN, and the UUJN regulates the maximum limit of honorarium and the Code of Ethics regulates the minimum limit of honorarium, and in Article 37 of the UUJN, Notaries are required to provide free legal services to people who are unable to afford it without charging an honorarium. Violations committed by Notaries due to charging an honorarium below the provisions stipulated in the Code of Ethics, then the sanctions that will be given based on the Code of Ethics are: a) Reprimand; b) Warning; c) Schorsing; (temporary dismissal) from membership of the Association; d) Onzetting (dismissal) from membership of the Association; e) Dishonorable dismissal from membership of the Association. Sanctions for violating the provisions of the honorarium according to the UUJN, For the first sanction is a verbal warning. When a verbal warning is not complied with by a Notary, the next tiered sanction that must be received by the Notary is a written warning.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2009, Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta

Abdul Manan, 2019, “Tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Terhadap Praktik Penerapan Honorarium Notaris”, Skripsi Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Erina Permatasari & Lathifah Hanim, 2017, Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Online, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 4, No. 3

Fonni, & Sitorus, W., 2018, Persekutuan Perdata Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Riau Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing, 1999, Peraturan Jabatan Notaris, Gelora Aksara Pratama, Jakarta

Hamry Theyer, 2013, Analisis Honorarium Jasa Hukum Notaris Dan Ketentuan Sanksi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, Vol. 2, No. 2

Manan, A., Tamrin, A. dan Wibawa, M.N., 2019, “Tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Terhadap Praktik Penerapan Honorarium Notaris”, Journal Of Legal Research, Vol. 1, No. 1

Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, 2008, Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia : Dulu, Sekarang Dan Dimasa Akan Datang, Gramedia Pustaka, Jakarta

Prayitno, I.S., 2019, Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Atas Ketentuan Honorarium Akta Notaris, Res Judicata, Vol. 2, No. 1

Sanyoto, 2008, “Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 3

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, 2003, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.