The Legal Protection against the Criminalization of Notary Positions and Land Deed Officials (PPAT)

Irfan Irfan, Achmad Arifullah

Abstract


It cannot be hidden, the position of the perpetrators of the position of notary public and land deed official (PPAT) is very vulnerable to becoming a “target for shooting†by law enforcement officials. The term that is currently viral is "Criminalization" by unscrupulous officials with various motives. Meanwhile, in work, notaries are always reminded to be professional and comply with the applicable laws and regulations that regulate standard work procedures. This is regulated, mainly in the Notary Office Law, and other regulations, including the Regulations for the position of a land deed official (PPAT). Apart from that, there is also a code of ethics. With regard to the explanation above, the purpose of this study is 1) to find out the form of legal protection against the criminalization of notary/PPAT positions in the city of Semarang, 2) to find out and analyze how to recover the rights and conditions of a notary who is caught in criminalization in carrying out his position in the city of Semarang. The approach method in this research is a sociological juridical approach. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive research. Data types use primary data and secondary data. Data collection using interview and literature study methods. The data analysis method used is qualitative analysis. The results of the study concluded that: 1) by applying the precautionary principle before making a deed, in order to examine all facts related to making a deed with considerations based on statutory regulations. 2) Rehabilitation is a form of eliminating all losses that have been caused by cases that have befallen a notary and is a form of restoring the rights of a notary by clearing the good name, position, dignity and dignity as a public official. If it is related to the case example in Decision Number: 650/Pid.B/2015/PN Dps, the form of compensation can be submitted in pretrial because the indictment does not fulfill the elements of crime of violating a criminal act and the indictment used is a criminal act that is not in accordance with the elements contained in a criminal act but rather a civil act so that this has shown that there has been an error in the application of law.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Ahmad Ramadan, (2022). Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terhadap Penyitaan Minuta Akta Oleh Penyidik Kepolisian, Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, Volume 4 No. 3.

Afriana, A. (2020). Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2), 246-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v1i2.250

Zahren Zukri Alyafie Dan Amin Purnawan, (2021), Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Dibuatnya Menurut Undang – Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Di Kota Kendari, Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Volume 3 No. 1.

Zahren Zukri Alyafie Dan Amin Purnawan, 2021, pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Dibuatnya Menurut Undang – Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Di Kota Kendari, Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR), Volume 3 No. 1.

Heriyanti, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap notaris yang Terindikasi Tindak Pidana Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Jurnal Yustisia 5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8748

Books:

Soerjono Soekanto. (1981). Kriminologi: Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta, Cetakan Pertama, Ghalia Indonesia.

Salim H. S. (2010). Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia.

Bambang Sunggono . (2003)/ Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Raja Grafika Persada.

Habib Adjie . (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia; Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Bandung, PT Refika Aditama.

Herlien Budiono. (2013) Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris, Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Civil Code (Based on the Civil Code).

Criminal Code (Criminal Code).

Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.

Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.

Law No.13 of 2006 on Witness and Victim Protection Law

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2018 concerning Technical Guidelines for Implementing Government Regulation Number 47 of 2007 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation Number 37 of 2007 concerning Land Registration.

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2019 concerning the Organization and Work Procedures of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia.

Internet:

Afriana, A. (2020). Position and Responsibilities of Notaries as Parties in Settlement of Civil Disputes in Indonesia Regarding the Deeds They Make. Journal of Padjadjaran Law Axis, 1(2), 246-261. DOIs:https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v1i2.250

Gomies, FR (2020). Notary in Convict Status Who is Still Carrying Out His Position. ARGUMENTUM Master of Law Journal, 7(1),https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v7i1.3009 p. 16

Habib Adje, Covernote of Never-Ending Conversations, https://youtu.be/QwSwk48sTcc

Heriyanti, Legal Protection for Notaries with Indications of a Crime in Making Authentic Deeds. Justisia Journal 5(1). DOIs: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8748


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.