Management Control Systems and Startup Legitimacy on Funding Success

Penulis

  • Heni Indah Pratiwi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Galih Fajar Muttaqin Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.15.1.16-28

Abstrak

This study aims to explore the dual role of Management Control Systems (MCS) as a mechanism for building startup legitimacy and its impact on funding success. Grounded in institutional theory and signaling theory, this research develops a conceptual framework that views MCS not only as an internal control tool but also as a strategic instrument for gaining legitimacy in the eyes of investors. The study employs an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Data were collected through a survey of 100 startups in Indonesia in 2025, as well as in-depth interviews with 15 founders and 10 investors. Quantitative analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0 reveals that MCS formalization and its use as a signal have a positive and significant effect on legitimacy, which in turn increases the probability of funding success. Furthermore, legitimacy is found to be a significant mediating variable in this relationship. Internally, the implementation of MCS also yields substantive benefits, including improved financial discipline and strategic clarity. These findings provide theoretical contributions to the MCS literature within the entrepreneurial context and offer practical guidance for startup founders in leveraging MCS as a tool to build credibility and attract investment.

Keywords: Management Control System (MCS), legitimacy, startup funding, institutional theory, signaling theory.

 

Referensi

Azeem, M., & Khanna, A. (2025). From incubation to survivor: impact of selected internal resources on the post-entry performance of university-incubated startups. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2024-0339

Barile, D., Secundo, G., & Magnusson, M. (2025). Exploring the digital innovation ecosystem from the perspective of platform-based startups: a case study in the film industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(9), 4976–4999. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2024-1040

Batra, S., Gupta, V. K., Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Seeds of demand-side legitimacy: when do existing companies procure from B2B startups? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(12), 2432–2441. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2021-0252

Becker, S. D., & Endenich, C. (2023). Entrepreneurial ecosystems as amplifiers of the lean startup philosophy: management control practices in earliest‐stage startups. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(1), 624–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12806

Becker-Blease, J. R., & Sohl, J. E. (2015). New venture legitimacy: the conditions for angel investors. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9668-7

Cardinal, L. B., Kreutzer, M., & Miller, C. C. (2017). An aspirational view of organizational control research: Re-invigorating empirical work to better meet the challenges of 21st century organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 559–592. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0086

Chakraborty, I., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Edirippulige, S. (2025). What characteristics define the success of early-stage health-tech startups? Journal of Health Organization and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-08-2024-0337

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Davila, A., Foster, G., & Jia, N. (2015). The valuation of management control systems in start-up companies: International field-based evidence. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.965720

Davila, A., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and control, entrepreneurship and innovation: Venturing into new research opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902731455

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Doghan, M. A. Al, Soomro, F. A., Abdelwahed, N. A. A., & Soomro, B. A. (2025). Corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: a bridging contribution of green human resource management. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-11-2024-0395

Gang, K., Kim, Y., Kim, B., & Kim, S. (2025). Comparing venture capital syndication and its outcomes in the USA and China: an institutional theory perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 17(6), 1511–1532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2025-0198

Gonçalves, K. Y., Braghini Junior, A., Silva, D. S., & Lermen, F. H. (2025). Knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAO) for startup management: a comprehensive review of barriers, strategies and a research agenda. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-11-2024-0232

Hoffmann, C. P., Knabben, L., & Krueper, T. (2025). The emergence of the financial communication function: exploring investor relations in start-ups. Journal of Communication Management, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2024-0243

Iglesias da Silva, T., de Miranda Oliveira Junior, M., & Mendes Borini, F. (2025). Startup business model adaptation amid uncertainty: evidence from Brazil. RAUSP Management Journal, 60(1), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2023-0138

Kharisma, D. B. (2021). Urgency of financial technology (Fintech) laws in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2020-0233

King, R., & Clarkson, P. (2015). Management control system design, ownership, and performance in professional service organisations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.06.002

Knight, A. P., Greer, L. L., & De Jong, B. (2020). Start-up teams: A multidimensional conceptualization, integrative review of past research, and future research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 231–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0061

Liu, W., Sahore, N., Gupta, B., Coppola, P., & Della Puca, A. (2025). Unearthing facets of sustainability initiatives reporting and legitimacy: a knowledge management perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2025-0896

Luiz, T. T., Beuren, I. M., Meurer, S., & Freitas, S. (2025). Strategic resilience: linking social control to product innovation performance in startups. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2023-1693

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Prasetyo, E. H. (2022). Legitimacy building of digital platforms in the informal economy: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(6), 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-02-2021-0073

Schäffer, U., Strauss, E., & Zecher, C. (2015). The role of management control systems in situations of institutional complexity. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(4), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-01-2015-0010

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control (boston: Harvard business school press). Stein, Robert E.(1994), The Next Phase of Total Quality Management: TQM II and The.

Spence, M. (1973). l the MIT press. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Supriyanto, S., Ramadana, M., & Istiqomah, N. (2025). The role of green investment in enhancing environmental disclosure in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2024-0274

Teittinen, H., Pellinen, J., & Järvenpää, M. (2023). Perceptions of Management Control in Post-acquisition Integration Context Through Sense-making: An Interpretive Case Study. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 12(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779231183024

Tiagarassa Pillay, M., & Kasseeah, H. (2025). Financial constraints and innovation in emerging economies: the moderating role of technological capabilities. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2024-0332

Umbreen, J., Abbas, S., Ahmad, Y., Naseem, A., & Mirza, M. Z. (2026). Is quality of service along with stakeholder interdependencies imperative for the socially sustainable digital startups? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 43(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2024-0005

Wei, S., Wang, L., Qi, R., Feng, T., Ma, T., & Yan, R. (2025). How digital transformation mindfulness affects digital business model innovation: the moderating role of digital orientation. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2024-1185

Xavier, Y. S. M., da Silva, C. E. S., Sampaio, P., & Gaudencio, J. H. D. (2026). Risk management as a crucial and challenging process for medical devices SMEs: evidence from a multiple case study on Brazilian and Portuguese startups. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 43(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2024-0356

Yang, J. J., Akroyd, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Accounting for purpose: traditional Chinese philosophies and management control systems in Chinese companies. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2024-2507

Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2017). “The liability of newness” revisited: Theoretical restatement and empirical testing in emergent organizations. Social Science Research, 63, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.006

Zhang, S., Zhu, W., Fu, J., & Xu, S. (2025). Perceived uncertainty and multiple embeddedness of digital startups. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2025-0052

Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-03-18

Terbitan

Vol 15 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Creative Commons License


License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JAI agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.