Legal Reconstruction of Restitution Fulfillment for Women and Child Victims of Online Human Trafficking

Iqram Syahputra

Abstract


The Crime of Trafficking in Persons (TPPO) has undergone a radical transformation in the digital era, shifting from conventional physical recruitment to highly organized, borderless online operations. This digital migration has created a massive and unprecedented threat, disproportionately targeting women and children who are sociologically and economically vulnerable to cyber-manipulation and online grooming. Despite the severe multidimensional impact of these exploitations, the current law enforcement paradigm in Indonesia remains heavily entrenched in a retributive justice framework. Consequently, the criminal justice system frequently succeeds in penalizing the perpetrators physically but systematically fails to restore the fundamental economic rights of the victims, particularly through the mechanism of restitution. This study aims to critically dissect the systemic and normative weaknesses within the current criminal justice system and to formulate a comprehensive legal reconstruction for fulfilling restitution for victims of online human trafficking. This Research use Employing a normative legal research method utilizing statutory, conceptual, and victimological approaches, this research analyzes the existing legal framework governing human trafficking and victim protection. The findings indicate that the chronic failure to execute restitution is primarily driven by critical legal loopholes.   the proposed legal reconstruction advocates for a radical paradigm shift. It includes the absolute elimination of substitute imprisonment penalties for syndicate actors and corporations, ensuring restitution functions as a coercive, non-negotiable obligation. Furthermore, it urges the institutionalization of mandatory, early-stage digital asset tracing concurrent with the initial investigation, the imposition of strict criminal liability and fines on digital platforms, and the establishment of an independent Victim Trust Fund financed by confiscated syndicate assets. Ultimately, this policy reconstruction represents the highest manifestation of Restorative Justice and the theory of Dignified Justice, shifting the legal focus from mere offender punishment to corporate impoverishment, thereby placing the recovery, dignity, and future of women and children at the absolute epicenter of law enforcement.

Keywords


Human Rights, Legal Studies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Faisal, M., & Hiariej, E. O. S. 2021. "Kelemahan Mekanisme Restitusi dalam Peradilan Pidana dan Urgensi Pemiskinan Pelaku TPPO." Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 8(2)

Setiawan, K. 2022. "Urgensi Pembentukan Victim Trust Fund Berbasis Aset Sitaan untuk Pemulihan Hak Korban TPPO." Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1)

Susanti, R. D. 2023. "Kejahatan Eksploitasi Anak di Era Siber: Tantangan Pembuktian dan Asset Recovery." Jurnal HAM dan Hukum Internasional, 12(3)

Books:

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2005. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti. 2003. Perdagangan Manusia dalam Lintas Batas Negara: Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Depok: Pusat Kajian Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Indonesia.

Makarim, Edmon. 2010. Pengantar Hukum Telematika: Suatu Kompilasi Kajian. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Prasetyo, Teguh. 2015. Keadilan Bermartabat: Perspektif Teori Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2009. Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2017. Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Seluk-Beluknya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Waluyo, Bambang. 2014. Viktimologi: Perlindungan Korban dan Saksi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Regulation:

Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 and Law Number 1 of 2024.

Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Human Trafficking.

Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.

Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2022 concerning Procedures for Settling Applications and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Victims of Crimes

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Proceedings of Legal International Conference and Studies has been indexed in:

    

 

 

 

ISSN: 2986-4089