Does Fintech Affect Consumer Retention in Islamic Banks? Empirical Evidence from OIC Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.9.2.103-115Kata Kunci:
Financial technology, FinTech, consumer retention, OIC countries, Islamic banking, Islamic bankAbstrak
FinTech is a trendy topic that has increased rapidly in Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries, where Muslim consumers desire to use banking services in a Sharia conforming way. Thus, the research seeks to examine the effect of FinTech applied by Islamic banks of OIC countries on consumer retention. The Islamic banking system in OIC nations has mainly been in the foreground in carrying FinTech to its operations at the initial phase. Although consumers typically do not select Islamic banks for technologies, the study tries to investigate the effect of FinTech in maintaining consumers. Data collection uses the strata sampling method; online questionnaires are spread and collected from 317 customers of chosen banks in OIC countries. SPSS 25.0 analyzes statistical data via numerous examinations such as regression analysis, factor analysis, sample adequacy, and reliability analysis. The results show that compliance, consulting services, and payments of FinTech affect consumer retention. However, financing services considered vital in conventional banks do not significantly influence consumer retention. The research tries to help Islamic banks satisfy their consumers by using FinTech applications and helping FinTech firms enhance their finance amenities.Referensi
Afroze, D., & Rista, F. I. (2022). Mobile financial services (MFS) and digital inclusion–a study on customers’ retention and perceptions. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 14(5), 768-785.
Aisyah, M. (2018). Islamic bank service quality and its impact on Indonesian customers’ satisfaction and loyalty. Al-Iqtishad Journal of Islamic Economics, 10 (2), 367–388.
Arner, D.W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R.P. (2015). The evolution of FinTech: a new post-crisis paradigm. Geo. J. Int’l L., 47(1), 1271.
Bartlett, M.S. (1954) A note on the multiplying factors for various x2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 16(1), 296–298.
Caria. (2017). FinTech: An Explorative Study into the Characteristics of their Business Models, Working Paper, April, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Citigroup. (2016). Digital Disruption: How FinTech is Forcing Banking to a Tipping Point. Retrieved from http://www.disruptivefinance.co.uk/2016/04/01/how-fintech-is-forcing-banking-to-a-tippingpoint-citi-report/.
Coetzee, J. (2018). Strategic implications of FinTech on South African retail banks. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 11.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Danesh, S.N., Nasab, S.A., & Ling, K.C. (2012). The study of customer satisfaction, customer trust, and switching barriers on customer retention in Malaysia hypermarkets. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(7), 141.
DinarStandard. (2020). State of the Global Islamic Economy 2019/20 Report. Retrieved 08 20, 2020, from Salaam Gateway: https://www.salaamgateway.com/specialcoverage/SGIE19-20#:~:text=The%202019%2F20%20State%20of,faith%2Dinspired%20ethical%20consumption%20needs
Dorfleitner, G., Hornuf, L., Schmitt, M., & Weber, M. (2017). Definition of FinTech and description of the FinTech industry. FinTech in Germany, 5–10, Springer, Cham.
Edward, M., & Sahadev, S. (2011). Role of switching costs in the service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer retention linkage. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(3), 327–345. DOI:10.1108/13555851111143240.
Ghalaita, J.B. (2015). The rise of the Islamic economy. Retrieved from https://www.worldfinance.com/banking/the-rise-of-the-islamic-economy
Gimpel, H., Rau, D., & Röglinger, M. (2017). Understanding FinTech start-ups – a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings. Electronic Markets, 28(1), 1–20.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Innovate Finance (2015) Innovate Finance Manifesto: U.K. 2020. Retrieved from https://appgfintech.org.uk/news/innovate-finance-manifesto-uk-2020/.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
KPMG (2017) The Pulse of FinTech Q4 2016: Global Analysis of Investment in FinTech. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/02/pulse-of-fintech-q4-2016.pdf.
Leech, N., Barrett, K., & Morgan, G.A. (2013). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Leong, K., & Sung, A. (2018). FinTech (financial technology): what is it and how to use technologies to create business value in FinTech way?. International Journal of Innovation, Management, and Technology, 9(2), 74–78.
Li, M., Green, R.D., Farazmand, F.A., & Grodzki, E. (2012). Customer loyalty: influences on three types of retail stores’ shoppers. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 5(1), 1–19.
Mok, A., & Saha, R. (2017). Strategic risk management in banking. Deloitte Inside Magazine. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/financial-services/Banking/lu_inside_issue14_ strategic_risk_management.pdf (accessed 2 October 2018).
Negassa, G. J., & Japee, G. P. (2023). The effect of bonding, responsiveness and communication on customer retention: the mediating role of customer satisfaction. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 22(2), 115-131.
Ozili, P. K., Mhlanga, D., Ammar, R., & Fersi, M. (2024). Information effect of fintech and digital finance on financial inclusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: Global evidence. FinTech, 3(1), 66-82.
Ramakrishnan, K. (2006). Customer Retention: The Key to Business Performance. Retrieved from http://www.estrategicmarketing.com/smNov-Dec2/art11.html (accessed 20 June 2018).
Sumarliah, E., Khan, S. Z., & Khan, R. U. (2022b). Modest wear e-commerce: examining online purchase intent in Indonesia. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 26(1), 90-108.
Sumarliah, E., Khan, S. U., & Khan, I. U. (2021). Online hijab purchase intention: the influence of the Coronavirus outbreak. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 598-621.
Sumarliah, E., Li, T., & Wang, B. (2020). Hijab fashion supply chain: a theoretical framework traversing consumers’ knowledge and purchase intention. MATEC Web of Conferences, 308, 04004. DOI:10.1051/matecconf/202030804004
Sumarliah, E., Usmanova, K., Mousa, K., & Indriya, I. (2022a). E-commerce in the fashion business: the roles of the COVID-19 situational factors, hedonic and utilitarian motives on consumers’ intention to purchase online. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 15(2), 167-177.
Vakulenko, Y., Arsenovic, J., Hellström, D., & Shams, P. (2022). Does delivery service differentiation matter? Comparing rural to urban e-consumer satisfaction and retention. Journal of Business Research, 142, 476-484.
Vizury (2023). Top 5 Customer Retention Challenges and their Solutions. Retrieved from https://vizury.com/blog/customer-retention-challenges
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
License and Copyright AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



