WHAT DRIVES CONSUMER SATISFACTION IN USING ISLAMIC FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.6.1.27-36Kata Kunci:
Attitude toward Islamic Financial Technology, Consumer Based Brand Equity, Consumer SatisfactionAbstrak
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between attitude toward Islamic financial technology as specific religious attitude and consumer based brand equity as market driven variable toward consumer satisfaction in Islamic financial technology. A questionnaire was designed to collect data from users of online service of Islamic financial technology in Indonesia. Incidental sampling method was adopted to collect data from the existing users. Regression analysis was used to test the proposed research model. This study become the first research how specific religious attitudes and market driven affect the consumer satisfaction. This research is a survey-based study. Hence a representative sample is mandatory. The result show that attitude toward Islamic financial technology insignificantly influences consumer satisfaction, meanwhile the consumer based brand equity has a positive effect on consumer satisfaction.
Referensi
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165845
Abosag, I., & Farah, M. F. (2014). The influence of religiously motivated consumer boycotts on brand image, loyalty and product judgment. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11–12), 2262–2283. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2013-0737
Altaf, M., Iqbal, N., Sany, S. S., & Sial, M. H. (2017). Managing Consumer-Based Brand Equity through Brand Xxperience in Islamic Banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2015-0048
Arner, D., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper, 80(047). https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801243
Butt, M. M., & Aftab, M. (2013). Incorporating Attitude Towards Halal Banking in an Integrated Service Quality, Satisfaction, Trust and Loyalty Model in Online Islamic Banking Context. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321311292029
Cristobal, E., Flavián, C., & GuinalÃu, M. (2007). Perceived e-service Quality (PeSQ): Measurement Validation and Effects on Consumer Satisfaction and Website Loyalty. Managing Service Quality, 17(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710744326
Dimitriades, Z. S. (2006). Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty and Commitment in Service Organizations: Some Evidence from Greece. Management Research News, 29(12), 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610717817
Faisal, M., Akhtar, A., & Rehman, A. (2014). Attitude of Muslims and Non-Muslims towards iIlamic Banking - An Exploratory Study in India. In Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis (Vol. 95). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3759(2014)0000095017
Farquhar, P. H. (1989). Managing Brand Equity. Marketing Research, September, 24–33.
Hubert, M., Blut, M., Brock, C., Backhaus, C., & Eberhardt, T. (2017). Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Mobile Shopping: Mobile Benefits, Customer Characteristics, Perceived Risks, and the Impact of Application Context. Psychology and Marketing, 34(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20982
Istanbulluoglu, D. (2017). Complaint Handling on Social Media: The Impact of Multiple Response Times on Consumer Satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.016
Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2012). Infidel Brands: Unveiling Alternative Meanings of Global Brands at the Nexus of Globalization, Consumer Culture, and Islamism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1086/665413
Kim, H. B., Kim, W. G., & An, J. A. (2003). The effect of consumer-based brand equity on firms’ financial performance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4–5), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760310483694
Ko, W. H., & Chiu, C. P. (2008). The Relationships between Brand Attitude, Customers’ Satisfaction and Revisiting Intentions of the University Students-A Case Study of Coffee Chain Stores in Taiwan. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 11(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020801926791
Meesala, A., & Paul, J. (2018). Service Quality, Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Hospitals: Thinking for the Future. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40(July), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.011
Nam, J., Ekinci, Y., & Whyatt, G. (2011). Brand Equity, Brand Loyalty and Consumer Satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.015
Palmié, M., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Caglar, U. (2019). The Evolution of the Financial Technology Ecosystem: An Introduction and Agenda for Future Research on Disruptive Innovations in Ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151(June), 119779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779
Pappu, R., & Quester, P. (2006). Does Customer Satisfaction Lead to Improved Brand Equity An Empirical Examination of Two Categories of Retail Brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610650837
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multipleitem Scale To Measure Readiness To Embrace New Technologies. Journal Of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.
Qazi, A., Tamjidyamcholo, A., Raj, R. G., Hardaker, G., & Standing, C. (2017). Assessing Consumers’ Satisfaction and Expectations through Online Opinions: Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 75(September), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.025
Sarkar, Abhigyan; Sarkar, J. G. (2017). Sing Hosanna for the Brands: the Process of Substituting Religion with Brand. Society and Business Review, 12(1), 33–45.
Torres, P., Augusto, G., & Lisboa, J. (2015). Determining the Causal Relationships that Affect Consumer-based Brand Equity: The Mediating effect of Brand Loyalty. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(6), 413–435.
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and Validating a Multidimensional Consumer-Based Brand Equity Scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00098-3
Zeithaml, V. A. (2012). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
License and Copyright AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



