The Influence of Sharia Financial Literacy and Fintech Lending Services on the Financial Behavior of Muslim Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.9.2.77-93Keywords:
Financial Literacy, Financial Services, Financial Behavior, Sharia Economics, MuslimAbstract
This study was conducted to find out how financial literacy and fintech lending services affect the financial management behavior of Muslim communities. This research uses a quantitative approach and surveys 272 respondents through electronic media. This research method uses the Structural Equation Model—Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) equation by taking a case study of Muslim communities in Indonesia. The results show that financial literacy, ease of fintech lending services, and trust in fintech lending services have a positive and significant effect on Muslim communities' financial management behavior. Meanwhile, the benefits of fintech lending services do not have a significant influence on the financial management behavior of Muslim communities. However, information is crucial in determining and making decisions. In the context of fintech lending services, speed and convenience play an essential role in shaping a person's financial behavior. Furthermore, the policy and legality of fintech lending are critical in improving public trust in the use of these services. Increased public trust in fintech lending services will have an impact on people's financial habits.
References
Aji, R. (2023). Marak Anak Muda Terlilit Utang Pinjol, Data Terbaru Ngeri. CNBC Indonesia. Available at: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20230909140936-17-470970/marak-anak-muda-terlilit-utang-pinjol-data-terbaru-ngeri
Amanah, E., Rahadian, D., & Iradianty, A. (2016). Pengaruh financial knowledge, financial attitude dan external locus of control terhadap personal financial management behavior pada mahasiswa s1 universitas telkom. eProceedings of Management, 3(2).
Anderson, C., Kent, J., Lyter, D. M., Siegenthaler, J. K., & Ward, J. (2000). Personal finance and the rush to competence: Financial literacy education in the US. Journal of family and consumer sciences, 107(2), 1-18.
Annur, C. M. (2023a). Kelompok Mahasiswa dan Pekerja Penyumbang Gagal Bayar Pinjol Terbesar se-Indonesia. Available at: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/10/24/kelompok-mahasiswa-dan-pekerja-penyumbang-gagal-bayar-pinjol-terbesar-se-indonesia
Annur, C. M. (2023b). Kredit Macet Pinjol Perseorangan Lebih Tinggi Ketimbang Badan Usaha. Available at: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/09/22/kredit-macet-pinjol-perseorangan-lebih-tinggi-ketimbang-badan-usaha
Annur, C. M. (2023c). Utang Pinjol Warga Jawa Barat Tembus Rp15 Triliun, Terbesar se-Indonesia. Kelompok Mahasiswa dan Pekerja Penyumbang Gagal Bayar Pinjol Terbesar se-Indonesia. Available at: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/09/21/utang-pinjol-warga-jawa-barat-tembus-rp15-triliun-terbesar-se-indonesia
Anugrah, S. H. (2024). Analisis Dampak Inovasi Layanan Keuangan Berbasis Teknologi, Literasi Keuangan, dan Inklusi Keuangan Terhadap Perilaku Keuangan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Pada Masyarakat Desa Kalijaya, Kecamatan Cibitung, Kabupaten Bekasi) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pelita Bangsa).
Arnani, M. (2024). (2024). Daftar Pinjol Resmi Berizin OJK Februari 2024. Available at: https://money.kompas.com/read/2024/02/03/164700526/daftar-pinjol-resmi-berizin-ojk-februari-2024
Au, Y. A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2008). The economics of mobile payments: Understanding stakeholder issues for an emerging financial technology application. Electronic commerce research and applications, 7(2), 141-164.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia Maret 2023. Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2023/07/17/2016/profil-kemiskinan-di-indonesia-maret-2023.html
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial services review, 7(2), 107-128.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Egeham, L. (2023). Ngeri! 25 Orang Bunuh Diri Akibat Terlilit Utang Pinjol Sepanjang 2023. Available at: https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5485790
Fachsandy, F., Abdullah Syafie, M. F., Shiddiq, M. I., Syamlan, Y. T., & Antonio, M. S. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Islamic Regtech Research Indexed by Dimension. AI. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics & Finance, 6(1).
Ferdiansyah, A., & Triwahyuningtyas, N. (2021). Analisis Layanan Financial Technology Dan Gaya Hidup Terhadap Perilaku Keuangan Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Manajemen, 6(1), 223-235.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hamid, R. S., & Anwar, M. S. (2019). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Berbasis Varian. PT Inkubator Penulis Indonesia.
Haqiqi, A. F. Z., & Pertiwi, T. K. (2022). Pengaruh financial technology, literasi keuangan dan sikap keuangan terhadap perilaku keuangan generasi Z di era pandemi Covid-19 pada mahasiswa UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 5(2), 355-367.
Isa, M., & Suryomurti, W. (2023, June). Sentiment analysis on the perception of sharia fintech in Indonesia. In 4th International Conference on Islamic Economics, Business, Philanthropy, and PhD Colloqium (ICIEBP 2022) (pp. 146-169). Atlantis Press.
Kim, D. J. (2003). Three essays on trust in business-to-consumer electronic commerce. State University of New York at Buffalo.
Luis, L., & Nuryasman, M. N. (2020). Pengaruh pengendalian diri, literasi serta perilaku keuangan terhadap kesejahteraan keuangan. Jurnal Manajerial Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(4), 994-1004.
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. American Economic Journal: Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44.
Mahabharata, Y. (2021). Benarkah Umat Islam Cenderung Miskin Seperti Dikatakan Jusuf Kalla? Jika Benar, Kenapa? Available at: https://voi.id/bernas/59407/benarkah-umat-islam-cenderung-miskin-seperti-dikatakan-jusuf-kalla-jika-benar-kenapa
Mujahidin, A. (2020). Pengaruh fintech e-wallet terhadap perilaku konsumtif pada generasi millennial. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 8(2), 143-150.
Murairwa, S. (2015). Voluntary sampling design. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 4(2), 185-200.
Permana, G. P. L., Rini, H. P. S., & Paramartha, I. G. N. D. (2021). Fintech Dari Perspektif Perilaku User Dalam Penggunaan E-Wallet Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Widya Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(1), 50-70.
Pramana, I. W. B., Atmadja, I. B. P., & Sutama, I. B. P. (2018). Peranan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Mengawasi Lembaga Keuangan Non Bank Berbasis Financial Technology Jenis Peer To Peer Lending. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 2, 1-14.
Purwanti, P. (2021). Pengaruh Financial Knowledge, Financial Attitude, Presepsi Kemudahan, Sosial Demografi Penggunaan Dana Dompet Digital Terhadap Financial Management Behavior (Studi Empiris Konsumen Mahasiswa Di Pelita Bangsa). Jurnal Daya Saing, 7(1), 57-66.
Rahma, T. I. F. (2018). Persepsi Masyarakat Kota Medan Terhadap Penggunaan Financial Technology. At-tawassuth: jurnal ekonomi islam, 3(1), 184-203.
Ramadhantie, S. L. (2022, January). Pengaruh Financial Knowledge Dan Financial Attitude Terhadap Financial Management Behaviour. In Bandung Conference Series: Business and Management (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 90-97).
Riyadi, M. I. (2023). OJK: Tingkat Literasi Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia Sangat Rendah. Available at: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20231028174656-78-1017125/ojk-tingkat-literasi-keuangan-syariah-di-indonesia-sangat-rendah
Rossa, A. (2022). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Kepercayaan, Risiko dan Keamanan terhadap Impulse Buying Pengguna SPaylater (Shopee Paylater) di Jadetabek. In Seminar Nasional Akuntansi dan Manajemen PNJ (Vol. 3).
Rusydiana, A. S. (2018). Developing Islamic financial technology in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 2(2), 143-152.
Safitri, T. A. (2022). Kontribusi Fintech Payment Terhadap Perilaku Manajemen Keuangan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing, 23(2), 140-145.
Savitri, E. N., Dewi, N. R., Amalia, A. V., & Prabowo, S. A. (2021, June). Learning using real science mask with qr code to increase students’ digital literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1918, No. 5, p. 052059). IOP Publishing.
Siswoyo, H. (2017). Metode SEM untuk Penelitian Manajemen AMOS Lisrel PLS. Jakarta: Luxima Metro Media.
Solikhatun, I., & Ridlwan, A. A. (2022). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan, dan Financial Technology terhadap Keputusan Keuangan Mahasiswa Yogyakarta. Edunusa: Journal of Economics and Business Education, 2(2), 179-185.
Sujarweni, W. (2014). Metodologi penelitian: Lengkap, praktis, dan mudah dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Tafitri, U., Fadhillah, A. N., & Antonio, M. S. (2023). Islamic securities crowdfunding global research: A bibliometric analysis. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics & Finance, 6(2).
Waty, N. Q. (2021). Analisis Perilaku Manajemen Keuangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Upn Veteran Jakarta Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta).
Wiyono, G., & Kirana, K. C. (2020). Efek Impresi Fintech Terhadap Perilaku Keuangan Usaha Kecil Menegah (UKM). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 21(1), 69-81.
Xiao, J. J. (2016). Handbook of Consumer Finance Research. Springer Science & Business Media. Springer Science & Business Media.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



