Visionary Leadership and Dynamic Capabilities: Transforming Pesantren into a Social Enterprise

Authors

  • A. Faiz Khudlari Thoha STIDKI Ar Rahmah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.9.1.46-62

Keywords:

Dynamic Capabilities, Educational Innovation, Organizational Transformation, Pesantren, Social Entrepreneurship, Visionary Leadership

Abstract

In the dynamic landscape of Indonesia's education and community development, Pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) have been traditional beacons of spiritual and moral guidance. Amidst evolving socio-economic challenges, these institutions are increasingly adopting the mantle of social entrepreneurship to extend their influence and impact. This study explores the transformation of Pesantren Riyadlul Jannah Pacet into a social enterprise, emphasizing the critical role of visionary leadership and dynamic capabilities. Utilizing a qualitative case study approach, it investigates how the Pesantren adapts and innovates while retaining its core religious and educational values. The research, through extensive interviews, observations, and document analysis, unveils the strategies and initiatives that have led to significant community and socio-economic advancements. It offers profound insights into the integration of traditional religious education with contemporary entrepreneurial practices, highlighting the potential of Pesantrens as agents of sustainable change and innovation. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the adaptive and transformative capacity of educational institutions in the face of societal needs and opportunities.

References

Baba, Y. (2015). Does learning orientation matter for nonprofit organization performance? Empirical evidence from Ghana. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-05-2013-0056

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Bate, P., Khan, R., & Pye, A. (2000). Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: Where organization design meets organization development. Organization Science, 11(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.2.197.12509

Bhardwaj, R., Srivastava, S., Taggar, R., & Bindra, S. (2021). Exploring micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities for social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(3), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-08-2021-0071

Chen, B. (2022). The impact of human capital on enterprise management. SHS Web of Conferences, 151, 01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202215101014

Cho, C., Kim, B., & Oh, S. (2022). Effects of the entrepreneurial strategic orientation of social enterprises on organizational effectiveness: case of South Korea. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010019

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.

Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.43

Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship.

Duque, L., & Schneider, U. (2008). Market orientation and organizational performance in the nonprofit context: Exploring both concepts and the relationship between them. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 19(2), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1300/j054v19n02_02

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.

Eng, T. Y., Ozdemir, S., Gupta, S., & Kanungo, R. P. (2020). International social entrepreneurship and social value creation in cause-related marketing through personal relationships and accountability. International Marketing Review, 37(5), 945–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-12-2018-0360

Eti-Tofinga, B., Singh, G., & Douglas, H. (2018). Facilitating cultural change in social enterprises. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(3), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-12-2016-0296

Fish, L., & Kim, J. (2014). Mylinkface: Teaching social entrepreneurship. The BRC Academy Journal of Education, 4(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.15239/j.brcacadje.2014.04.01.ja02

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.

Haugh, H. (2007). Community-led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00168.x

Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening goliaths versus emerging davids — Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005

Holten, A., & Brenner, S. (2015). Leadership style and the process of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-11-2012-0155

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002

Ince, I., & Hahn, R. (2020). How dynamic capabilities facilitate the survivability of social enterprises: A qualitative analysis of sensing and seizing capacities. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(6), 1256–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12487

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Statistik Pesantren. Retrieved from https://ditpdpontren.kemenag.go.id/pdpp

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2021). Menko Airlangga: Program Pesantrenpreneur Dorong Kemandirian dan Gerakkan Ekonomi Kerakyatan. Siaran Pers. Retrieved from https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/3336/menko-airlangga-program-pesantrenpreneur-dorong-kemandirian-dan-gerakkan-ekonomi-kerakyatan

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

Luo, W., Zhang, C., & Li, M. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibilities on sustainable financial performance: Mediating role of shared vision capabilities and moderating role of entrepreneurship. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29

(5), 1266-1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2268

Mahfud, M. (2021). Program One Pesantren - One Product in the perspective of social entrepreneurship. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1207-1212.

Moran, J. W., & Brightman, B. K. (2001). Leading organizational change. Career Development International, 6(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430110381014

Prasetiyawan, A. A., & Rohimat, A. M. (2019). Pemberdayaan perempuan berbasis pesantren dan social entrepreneurship. Muwazah, 11(2), 163-180.

Reginald, A. R., & Mawardi, I. (2014). Kewirausahaan Sosial pada Pondok Pesantren Sidogiri Pasuruan. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 1(5).

Robani, A., Ahamat, A., Hassan, S. N. S., Latief, H., & Pratiwi, A. (2022). Islamic solidarity economy: The case study of social entrepreneurship in Pesantren, Indonesia. Middle East Journal of Management, 9(6), 665-681.

Rofiaty. (2019). Various references and articles related to management and transformation in Pesantren.

Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2015). From advocacy to social innovation: A typology of social change efforts by nonprofits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2581–2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9543-9

Srivastava, S. K., & Frankwick, G. L. (2011). Environment, management attitude, and organizational learning in alliances. Management Decision, 49(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094437

Suhirman, & Aminy, M. (2022). The role of trust in developing social capital in Islamic boarding schools. Manuscript in preparation.

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689-709.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Unair News. (2020). Pesantren Riyadlul Jannah Pacet received entrepreneurship award from Minister of Religion. Unair News. Retrieved from [URL]

Vézina, M., Malo, M.-C., & Fontan, J.-M. (2019). The contribution of dynamic capabilities to the internationalization of social enterprises. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 10(1), 25–41.

Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 736-759.

Warner, K., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Zhang, J., Ouyang, Y., Philbin, S., Zhao, X., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., & Li, H. (2020). Green dynamic capability of construction enterprises: Role of the business model and green production. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2920-2940. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2012

Zheng, S. (2021). Research on the effect of knowledge network embedding on the dynamic capabilities of small and micro enterprises. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5522788

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): March 2024

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
IJIBE uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.