The Design Model of Halal Product Assurance Implementation

Authors

  • Nur Diana Dewi Institut Daarul Qur'an Jakarta
  • Muhammad Zilal Hamzah Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml
  • Eleonora Sofilda Universitas Trisakti image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.8.1.69-82

Keywords:

model, halal, product, assurance certification

Abstract

The majority of Indonesia's population is Muslim in the amount 87.21% of a total of 237 million people. However, this is not directly proportional to the lack of halal product certification in Indonesia. The study aims to determine the implementation of halal product assurance certification in Indonesia by analyzing the Indonesia and Malaysia certification without neglecting the readiness of LPPOM MUI and BPJPH in facing changes to the halal certification regulations of JPH Law. The research method was the interview and FGD techniques. The data was processed by NVivo 12. The implication of this research shows that the JPH Law can organize effectively with the hard work of BPJPH to synergize the stakeholders. The implementation model of halal product assurance adjusted to the strategy and work plan for JPH by emphasizing the increasing stakeholder involvement, G2G Cooperation, and SME Development.

References

Agtas, S.A. (2020). Pemerintah dan DPR Sepakat Sertifikasi Halal Tak Lagi Dimonopoli MUI. Jakarta: Liputan 6.

Al-Qaradhawi, Y. (2017). Tuntas Memahami Halal dan Haram. Jakarta: PT Serambi SeSMEta Industri.

Asnawi, N., Sukoco, B. M., & Fanani, M. A. (2018). Halal Products Consumption in International Chain Restaurants among Global Moslem Consumers. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1273-1290.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik Indonesia Statistical Yearbook Of Indonesia 2020. Jakarta

Bazeley, Patricia, & Jackson, Kristi. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Edited by Jai Seaman. The Second

Cresswell, J. (2009). Third Edition Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. United States of America: Sage Publications.

Dinar Standar. (2019). State of The Global Islamic Economy Report. Dubai

Dinar Standar. (2020). State of The Global Islamic Economy Report. Dubai

Faridah, H. D. (2019). Sertifikasi Halal di Indonesia: Sejarah, Perkembangan, dan Implementasi. Journal of Halal Product and Research, 70.

Hasan, S. (2014). Sertifikasi Halal dalam Hukum Positif (reguklasi dan Implementasi di Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Hasanuddin, M., & Al-Aiyub, S. (2018). Daging Kura-Kura Halal Atau Haram? Jakarta: LPPOM MUI.

IHLC, I. H. (2018). Roadmap Strategi dan Ekonomi Halal Indonesia 2018/2019. Jakarta: Dinar Standar.

Jati, Sumunar. (2020). Perancangan Transformasi Institusi Penyelenggara dan Pengelola Sertifikasi Halal di Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Soft System Methodology: Studi Kasus di LPPOM MUI. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 7 (2), 390-402.

Kemenag. (2017). Kementrian Agama RI dalam Angka 2016. Jakarta: Biro Hubungan Masyarakat.

Maulayati, R. R. (2019). Model Pengembangan Produk Halal. Jurnal Investasi Islam, 19-32.

Nugroho, K. B. (2016). Asal Mula Sertifikasi Halal. Jakarta: Tirto.id.

Thoriq. (2016). Dosen Al Azhar: Indonesia dan Malaysia Paling Taat Memegang Madzhab As Shafi’i. Jakarta: Hidayatullah.com.

Tieman, Marco, Vorst, & Ghazali. (2012). Principles In Halal Supply Chain Management. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(3), 1-14.

Waharini, Faqiatul, & Purwantini. (2018). Model Pengembangan Industri Halal Food di Indonesia. Jurnal Muqtasid Magelang, 9(1), 1-12.

Zaka, G. (2021). Cek Fakta: Gus Yaqut Menggila, Sertifikasi Halal Dikabarkan Dipegang PT Surveyor Indonesia Bukan MUI. Bekasi: Pikiran Rakyat Bekasi.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): March 2023

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with IJIBE agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
IJIBE uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Open Data and Software Publishing and Sharing
The journal strives to maximize the replicability of the research published in it. Authors are thus required to share all data, code or protocols underlying the research reported in their articles. Exceptions are permitted but have to be justified in a written public statement accompanying the article.
Datasets and software should be deposited and permanently archived inappropriate, trusted, general, or domain-specific repositories (please consult http://service.re3data.org and/or software repositories such as GitHub, GitLab, Bioinformatics.org, or equivalent). The associated persistent identifiers (e.g. DOI, or others) of the dataset(s) must be included in the data or software resources section of the article. Reference(s) to datasets and software should also be included in the reference list of the article with DOIs (where available). Where no domain-specific data repository exists, authors should deposit their datasets in a general repository such as ZENODO, Dryad, Dataverse, or others.
Small data may also be published as data files or packages supplementary to a research article, however, the authors should prefer in all cases a deposition in data repositories.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.