The Relevance of Justice Values in Compensation for Children as Victims of Wrongful Arrest

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/icls.v6i1.54031

Keywords:

Children, Compensation, Victims, Wrongful.

Abstract

In its development, Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 concerning the second amendment to Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983 concerning Compensation and Settlement of Compensation Amounts has issues related to the fines specified in Government Regulation Number 92 of 2015 concerning the second amendment to Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983 concerning Compensation and Settlement of Compensation Amounts. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the relevance of the value of justice in the implementation of compensation for victims of wrongful arrest. The method used is non-doctrinal. The results of the study found that the implementation of compensation for victims of wrongful arrest is not yet fair, as indicated by the amount of compensation, which is only IDR. 500,000.00. The reasons for the implementation of compensation for victims of wrongful arrest are weaknesses in legal regulations, difficult access to legal aid for the poor, and minimal government involvement. Therefore, it is clear that the implementation of compensation for victims of wrongful arrest contradicts the mandate of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As a result, the implementation of compensation for victims of wrongful arrest has not been able to achieve justice.

Author Biography

  • Wahid Mashadi, Sultan Agung Islamic University
    ACADEMICIAN

References

Achmad Irwan Hamzani, dkk., 2019, Cita Hukum Pancasila di antara Pluralitas Hukum Nasional, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum Transendental Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Djoko Prakoso, 1988, Masalah Ganti Rugi Di Dalam KUHAP, Bina Aksara, Jakarta

Julius Ibrani, Review Singkat PP No. 27 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pelkasanaan KUHAP, Diakses melalui ylbhi.or.id, pada 12 Mei 2026

LBH Jakarta, Hakim Kabulkan Ganti Kerugian Pengamen Cipulir, Diakses melalui www.bantuanhukum.or.id, on 12 May 2016

P.J.P Tak, 1970, Schade Vergoeding voor Ondegane Voorlopige Hechtenis on Straf, Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht Deel Lxxix afl 1

Soedirjo, 1986, Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana Arti dan Makna, Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta

Syarif Abdul Rohmani dan Umi Rozah, Kebijakan Kriminal Mengenai Pemberian Ganti Kerugian terhadap Korban Salah Tangkap, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020

Tongat, “Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Falsafah Negara dan Makna Filosofisnya dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional”, Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 41, No. 3

Downloads

Published

2026-09-10

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): The 9th JULY 2026-Proceedings of Legal Internasional Conference and Studies (LICS 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
  3. The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law