The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement in Fulfilling the Rights to Restitution and Compensation for Victims of Human Trafficking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/icls.v6i1.54239Keywords:
Crime of Human Trafficking, Compensation, Effectiveness of Law Enforcement, Restitution, Victim Protection.asAbstract
Trafficking in Persons (TIP) constitutes a human rights violation that inflicts physical, psychological, social, and economic harm upon victims. Consequently, beyond imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators, the criminal justice system must ensure the fulfillment of victims' rights through restitution and compensation mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement regarding the fulfillment of restitution and compensation rights for TIP victims in Indonesia, as well as to identify various obstacles and strategies for optimization. The research employs a normative legal method utilizing a library research approach, analyzing relevant legislation, literature, court rulings, and legal doctrines. The findings indicate that Indonesia possesses an adequate legal framework comprising Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 31 of 2014 on Witness and Victim Protection, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2022 (Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007; Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014). However, the effectiveness of fulfilling restitution and compensation rights remains suboptimal due to weak mechanisms for enforcing judgments, suboptimal coordination among law enforcement agencies, difficulties in proving victim losses, perpetrators' limited financial capacity to pay restitution, and a legal culture still oriented toward punishing offenders. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, optimize the role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), enhance inter-agency coordination, and reinforce a law enforcement paradigm focused on the protection and restoration of victims' rights to achieve more effective and equitable justice.References
Journals:
Andini, S. P., Putri, I. H., & Rosnawati, E. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis hak restitusi, rehabilitasi, dan ganti rugi bagi korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 16.
Bui, U. A., Efendi, S., & Mandala, O. S. (2024). Studi komparatif pelaksanaan hak restitusi bagi korban perdagangan orang di Indonesia. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 5(2).
Chusna, A., & Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Peran LPSK dalam pemenuhan hak korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3).
Dadang, H. A., & Hendra, R. (2023). Pemberian restitusi korban kasus pidana perdagangan orang dan pemberantasan tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1).
Herawati, R. (2022). Implementasi restitusi bagi korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 11(2).
Indrawan, R. M. J., & Darusman, Y. M. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang di Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 12(1).
Nurhayati, S. (2022). Efektivitas pemenuhan hak restitusi korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1).
Vitasari, S. D., Sukananda, S., & Wijaya, S. (2020). Pelaksanaan pemberian restitusi terhadap korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. DIVERSI: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1).
Books:
Bales, K. (2012). Disposable people: New slavery in the global economy (Rev. ed.). University of California Press.
Muladi. (2002). Hak asasi manusia, politik dan sistem peradilan pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Nawawi, A. B. (2016). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Regulation:
Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons. (2007).
Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. (2014).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law