Gendered Politeness in Directive Speech Acts: Social Class Representation in Toer’s Bumi Manusia
Abstract
This study investigates the use of politeness strategies in directive speech acts in Pramoedya Ananta Toer’s Bumi Manusia, focusing on how gender and social class shape their realization. Grounded in speech act theory and Brown and Levinson’s politeness framework, the study analyzes directive utterances produced by male and female characters in the novel. The findings show that both genders predominantly employ mitigated directive forms, particularly negative politeness strategies such as permission-seeking expressions, interrogative structures, and politeness markers. While gender influences the stylistic realization of directives—male characters tending toward indirect, permission-based requests and female characters frequently combining mitigation with relational markers—these differences are not absolute. More importantly, social class and power relations play a decisive role in determining politeness strategy selection. Characters in subordinate positions consistently rely on indirect and deferential strategies, whereas those with higher social or economic authority are pragmatically licensed to issue more direct, though still polite, directives. The study concludes that in Bumi Manusia, directive politeness is primarily shaped by class-based hierarchy rather than gender alone, highlighting how colonial social structures are interactionally constructed through everyday speech.
Keywords: directive speech acts; politeness strategies; gender; social class
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chintawidy, Putri A., and Ni Wayan Sartini. “A Cross-Cultural Pragmatics Study of Request Strategies and Politeness in Javanese and Sundanese.” Journal of Pragmatics Research, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, pp. 152-166.
Kamal, N., and M. Mhamed. “Politeness, Deference, and Power Dynamics in Cross-Cultural Communication.” Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 11, no. 2, 2024, pp. 1153-1170.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. “On Speech Acts.” Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2021.
Yoon, Erica J., et al. “Polite Speech Emerges from Competing Social Goals.” Open Mind, vol. 4, 2020, pp. 71-87.
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Harvard UP, 1962.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 5, no. 3, 1984, pp. 196–213.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge UP, 1987.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. “Internal and External Mitigation in Interlanguage Request Production: The Case of Greek Learners of English.” Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 4, no. 1, 2008, pp. 111–138.
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge UP, 2013.
Mills, Sara. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge UP, 2003.
Searle, John R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge UP, 1979.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Proceedings of Culture, Education, Literature and Language International Conference
published by Faculty of Language, Literature, and Culture, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km 4 Terboyo Kulon, Kec. Genuk, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia