The Law of Bribery in the Judiciary: A Comparative Analysis of the Opinions of Yusuf Qardhawi and Asy-Syaukani

Penulis

  • Aripin Marpaung State Islamic University of North Sumatra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i4.40686

Kata Kunci:

Bribery, Comparative, Justice, Maqasid.

Abstrak

This research focuses on the principle of justice in Islamic law, which is seen as the main foundation for the entire sharia legal system, especially in the context of bribery cases in upholding rights and eliminating injustice. The main objective of this research is to understand the limitations and exceptions related to the law of bribery according to the views of two major scholars, Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Asy-Syaukani, and how the concept of maqasid sharia (the purpose of sharia) is applied in emergency situations that allow the permissibility of bribery. The research method used is a comparative analysis between the two views, by exploring the background of the arguments and the underlying context of Islamic law. The results show that Yusuf al-Qaradawi permits bribery in urgent emergencies, especially when it is the only way to defend a neglected right or eliminate injustice, after all legitimate efforts allowed by religion have been taken. In contrast, Asy-Syaukani forbids bribery absolutely without exception, based on the generality of the hadith that forbids the practice of bribery. In this comparison, Asy-Syaukani's view is considered stronger in terms of evidence, but in the current context, Yusuf al-Qaradawi's view is considered more relevant to the conditions in Indonesia, where bribery is sometimes used as a way to defend rights in urgent situations.The conclusion of this study confirms that the maqasid principle of sharia, which includes the fulfillment of emergency needs (dharuriyyat), general needs (hajiyyat), and refinement (tahsiniyyat), can be the basis for the permissibility of bribery under certain conditions. The legal consequences of bribery in order to defend rights are imposed on the recipient of the bribe and its intermediaries, while the bribe giver is not subject to sanctions because the aim is to claim legitimate rights.

Biografi Penulis

  • Aripin Marpaung, State Islamic University of North Sumatra
    ACADEMICIAN

Referensi

Journals:

Bahgia. (2023). Risywah Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam & Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Sua. Mizan; Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 1(2), 176. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.32507/Mizan.V1i2.123

Choiri, B. S. (2017). Risywah Politik Dalam Perspektif Hanafiyah & Syafiiyah. Fakultas Syariah & Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 60. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/41483

Dery, T. (2002). Keadilan Dalam Islam. Mimbar : Jurnal Sosial & Pembangunan, 18(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.29313/Mimbar.V18i3.78

Fadli, M., & Iskandar,. (2022). Praktik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Peradilan Indonesia & Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi Oleh Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia. Khazanah Multidisiplin, 3(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.15575/kl.v3i1.17170

Gunawan, G. (2018). Wacana Tafsir Tentang Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur`An Yang Berhubungan Dengan Korupsi. Pascasarjana Institut PTIQ Jakarta: Program Studi Ilmu Al-Quran & Tafsir Konsentrasi Ilmu Tafsir Program. https://repository.ptiq.ac.id/id/eprint/43/

Harun, N. (2013). Makna Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam & Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.30984/As.V11i1.166

Haryadi, S. (2015). Reinterpretasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Oleh Penegak Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-’Adalah, 12(1), 551. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v12i1.233

Haryono. (2016). Risywah (Suap-Menyuap) & Perbedaannya Dengan Hadiah Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam (Kajian Tematik Ayat & Hadis Tentang Risywah). Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam & Pranata Sosial, 4(7), 429–448. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.30868/Am.V4i07.155

Hasan, S. R., Cahyadi, T. D., & Mu’aziz, F. (2023). Risywah Dalam Rangka Mengambil Hak. Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah, 10(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.37397/amj.v10i2.300

Hikmah, I. W. (2022). Suap Dalam Q.S. Al-Baqarah/2: 188 (Studi Analisisma’na-Cum-Maghza). Jurnal Pappasang : Jurnal Studi Studi Al Quran – Hadis & Pemikiran Islam, 4(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.46870/Jiat.V4i1.156

Kertayasa, H., Guntara, D., & Garwan, I. (2022). Risywah Dalam Politik Menurut Persfektif Hukum Islam. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian & Pengabdian Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, 2(1), 315–330. https://journal.ubpkarawang.ac.id/index.php/ProsidingKNPP/article/view/2478

Maulida, A., Hafidhuddin, D., Syafri, U. A., & Tamam, A. M. (2020). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia & Pidana Islam. Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam & Pranata Sosial Islam, 8(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v8i01.677

Rangkuti, A. (2017). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Islam. Tazkiya, Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.30829/Taz.V6i1.141

Samsudin. (2016). Analisis Pendapat Al Ghazali Tentang Kriteria Pemimpin Dalam Islam. Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, 49. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/5699/

Sukadi, I. (2011). Matinya Hukum Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Risalah Hukum7. Risalah Hukum, 7(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/Https://E-Journal.Fh.Unmul.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Risalah/Article/View/171

Sya’bana, Y. A., Asmuni, & Anggraini, T. (2023). Dampak Ikhtikar & Risywah Dalam Perekonomian. Jurnal Tabarru’ : Islamic Banking and Finance, 6(1), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.25299/jtb.2023.vol6(1).13287

Tamam, M. H. B., & Nurita, A. (2023). Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hadis Imam Bukhari. El-Nubuwwah: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 1(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.19105/elnubuwwah.v1i2.9792

Tanjung, I. (2017). Pemberian Hadiah Kepada Pegawai/Pejabat (Tinjauan Hukum Islam & Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001. Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 63. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/5374/

Zaki, M. (2014). Kepemilikan Individu Menurut Islam. Mizan; Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 2(1), 100. https://doi.org/Https://Doi.Org/10.32507/Mizan.V2i1.136

Books:

Abd. Muhsin, A. B. (2001). Suap Dalam Pandangan Islam. Gema Insani Press.

al-Syaukani, al imam muhammad. (1994). Terjemah Nailul Authar jilid VIII. Cv Asy syifa.

Al-Annawawi. (2008). Shahih Muslim Bi Syarh Al-Nawawi. Dar Al Kutb Al-Ilmiyah.

Al-Asqallani, I. H. (2016). Bulugul Maram Min Adillatih Al-Ahkam (8 ed.). Jabal.

Al-Murattib. (1992). Mansuat Al-Sunnah Al-Kutb Al-Sittah Wa SyarhunaJuz XVIII. Dar Sahnun.

Al-Qaradhawi, Y. (2017a). Halal Wa Al-Haram Fi Al-Islam, (Terj: M. Tatam Wijaya). Qalam.

Al-Sais, M. A. (1953). Tafsir Ayat Al-Ahkam, Juz II. Mutba;Ah Muhammad Ali Sabin.

Al-Syafi’i, A. M. A.-H. B. M. A.-F. A.-B. (t.t.). Tafsir Al-Bagawi Al Musamma Ma;Alim Al-Tanzil Juz II. Dar Al-Kutb Al-Ilmiyah.

Ash-Shalaby, A. M. (2017). Biografi Umar Bin Abdul Aziz. Ummul Qura.

Republik Indonesia, D. A. (2020). Alquran & terjemah. Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Umar, M. N. (2006). Kaidah Fiqhiyyah & Pembaharuan Hukum Islam. Yayasan WDC.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-11-28

Terbitan

Vol 11 No 4 (2024): December 2024

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
  2. Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
  3. The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Notarial Law (M.Kn) UNISSULA and is protected by law