The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public

Authors

  • Tetti Samosir Pancasila University
  • Indah Harlina Pancasila University
  • Fikri Miftakhul Akbar Pancasila University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i4.27920

Keywords:

Agreement, Forgery, Responsible.

Abstract

The notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds, in which the obligation of a notary in carrying out his position must act honestly, reliably, independently, impartially, thoroughly, and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. This is known as the precautionary principle for a notary in carrying out his position as a public official. The purpose of this writing is to examine the legal implications of counterfeiting and the responsibility of a notary to the binding sale and purchase agreement he made. The research method used in this paper is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. The results and findings obtained after conducting research and analysis of the problems in this paper, namely the legal impact due to the negligence of a notary in making a binding sale and purchase agreement because to forgery, so that the legal consequences of these PPJB are void, this is because it is not in accordance with the legal requirements of an agreement as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely those relating to lawful causes. This happens because the notary in carrying out his authority does not carry out his obligations related to the principle of precautionary, therefore the notary must be responsible for his actions that have been carried out in accordance with the law and code of ethics. So it can be concluded that the deed made by the notary is null and void and is not an authentic deed but a private deed.

Author Biographies

  • Tetti Samosir, Pancasila University

    A LECTURER AT PANCASILA UNIVERSITY MAJOR FACULTY OF LAW, LECTURER IN LAW STUDY PROGRAM AND NOTARY MASTER STUDY PROGRAM

  • Indah Harlina, Pancasila University
    A LECTURER AT PANCASILA UNIVERSITY MAJOR FACULTY OF LAW, LECTURER IN LAW STUDY PROGRAM AND NOTARY MASTER STUDY PROGRAM
  • Fikri Miftakhul Akbar, Pancasila University

    I AM A STUDENT JUST GRADUATED FROM PANCASILA UNIVERSITY WITH MAJOR MAGISTER NOTARY

References

Journals:

Aulia Gumilang Rosadi. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Sengketa Para Pihak Terkait Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Yang Dibuatnya. JCH (Jurnal Cendikia Hukum), Vol. 5, No. 2, 247. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/228-1088-1-PB.pdf

Desi Syamsiah. (2021). Kajian Terkait Keabsahan Perjanjian E-Commerce Bila Ditinjau Dari pasal 1320 KUHPerdata Tentang Syarat Sah Perjanjian. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, Vol. 2, No. 1, 329-330. https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/view/1443/1120

Fabryan Nur Muhammad, Yeni Widowaty, Trisno Rahardjo. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris. Media of Law and Sharia, Vool. 1, No. 1, 11, https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mls

I Gusti Agung Dhenita Sari, I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana, Made Gde Subha Karma Resen. (2018). Kewenangan Notaris Dan PPAT Dalam Proses Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan Atas Tanah Hak Milik. Acta Comitas, Vol 1. 45. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ActaComitas/article/download/39327/23809

Ida Bagus Paramaningrat Manuaba, I Wayan Parsa, dan I Gusti Ketut Ariawan. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik. Acta Comitas, Vol. 1, 59–74. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/241261-prinsip-kehati-hatian-notaris-dalam-memb-38db8cdc.pdf

Kadek Setiadewi. (2020). Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, Vol 6, No. 1, 130. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23446

Muhammad Tiantanik Citra Mido, I Nyoman Nurjaya, Rachmad Safa’at. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Oerdata Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibacakan oleh Staf Notaris di Hadapan penghadap. Lentera Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 1, 168-171. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/295409113.pdf

Sania Salamah & Agung Iriantoro. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-hatian dan Tanggungjawab Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Berdasarkan Pasal 16 Ayat (1) Huruf a Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 457 PK/Pdt/2019. Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan Imanot, Vol. 2, No. 2, 585-586. https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/imanot/article/view/2875/1825

Sondang Irene Simanjuntak, Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. (2022). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Yang Dilakukan Karyawan Notaris Tanpat Sepengetahuan Notaris Yang Mempekerjakannya. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, Vol 8, No. 1, 75. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jkh/article/view/43874.

Sulardi dan Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo, `Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan, dan Keadilan Terhadap Perkara Pidana Anak’, 8/3 (2015), 263. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/57/49

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII Press,

Andi Hamzah, (2005). Kamus Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia,

Dami Chazawi dan Ardi Ferdian, (2014). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Tindak Pidana yang Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Mengenai Kebenaran Isi Tulisan dan Berita yang Disampaikan, Jakarta: Penerbit Putra Utama Offset,

Hans Kelsen, (2006), sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Mutaqien, Teori Hukum Murni, Jakarta: Nuansa & Nusa Media,

Hans Kelsen, (2007), sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Somardi, General Theory Of law and State , Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empirik, Jakarta: BEE Media Indonesia,

HR. Ridwan, (2006), Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,

J. Satrio, (1999), Hukum Perikatan (Perikatan Pada Umumnya), Bandung: Alumni,

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2008),Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana,

Rahardjo, S, (2003), Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas,

Soerjono Soekanto, (2010), Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, UI Press,

Sugiyono, (2009), Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta,

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, (1990). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, Third printing,

W.J.S Poerwadarminta, (1982), Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka,

Interview:

Dr. Armansyah, SH., MH., Personal Interview, Lecturer of Master Notary Law, Faculty of Law, University of Pancasila, Depok, 28 June 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-24