The Position of Legal Protection for Debtors for Bankruptcy Conducted by Separatist Creditors in terms of Act No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.450-458Kata Kunci:
Legal Protection, Debtors, Bankruptcy, Separatist Creditors.Abstrak
The purpose of this research is to know and analyze; 1). The current implementation of debtor legal protection for bankruptcy is carried out by separatist creditors. 2) Factors that influence the implementation of debtor's legal protection for bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors. 3) The proper implementation of debtor legal protection for bankruptcy by separatist creditors. This study uses a normative juridical research method, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This type of research is descriptive analytical. The data collection technique is the literature study of this thesis. The data analysis method is descriptive qualitative analytical. The results show that: 1. The implementation of the Bankruptcy Law has not provided protection to debtors, because: The requirements for requesting a bankruptcy statement make it easier for the debtor to be declared bankrupt, even though the debtor is actually in a solvent condition; The PKPU mechanism has not provided broad opportunities for debtors to improve company performance; and Efforts in bankruptcy are dominated by the authority of creditors. 2. Factors that influence the implementation of debtor's legal protection against bankruptcy carried out by separative creditors are: There are no funds for the costs of managing and settling bankruptcy assets; Bankrupt Debtor is not cooperative; and The debtor sells/transfers his assets before being declared bankrupt. 3. The Bankruptcy Law in future requires an insolvency test. This is based on reasons to prevent debtors whose assets are more than their debts being declared bankrupt by the court.
Referensi
Journal:
Anisah, Siti. “Studi Komperatif Terhadap Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dan Debitor dalam Hukum kepailitan†, Jurnal Hukum. No. Special Edition Vol. 16 October 2009 30-50.
Books:
Andreas. (2010). "Hukum Fidusiaâ€. Malang: Selaras.
Darmadji, Tjiptono. (2001). Restrukturisasi: Memulihkan dan Mengakselerasi Ekonomi Nasional. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Kusumati, Yuli Noor & Sri Opti. (2005). Akuntansi Keuangan Lanjutan I. STEKPI YAPPINDO. Cetakan ke I.
Natigor, Togar. (2008). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Dalam Proses Kepailitan dan Pemberesaan Budel Pailit. Thesis. Magister Hukum UI.
Rahmadewi, Maria Regina Fika. (2007). Penyelesaian Utang Debitur Terhadap Kreditur Melalui Kepailitan. Thesis. Magister Kenotariatan Undip.
Rahmadewi, Maria Regina Fika. (2007). Penyelesaian Utang Debitur Terhadap Kreditur Melalui Kepailitan, Thesis, Magister Kenotariatan Undip.
Soejartin, Drs. Iur. R. Hukum Dagang I dan II, Penerbit Pradnya Paramita.
Sudradjat, Agus. (1996). Kepailitan Dan Kaitannya Dengan Lembaga Perbankan, National Seminar Paper on Bankruptcy Institutions in Economic Law Reform in Indonesia, Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.
Suryabrata, Sumardi. (1993). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Sutedi, Adrian. (2009). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Internet:
https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/320/node/19/undangundang-nomor-4-tahun-1998/, accessed on 11 January 2020 at 22:15 WIB.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
