The Responsibility of Werda Notary to Deals the Problems What Has Done
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.3.745-755Keywords:
Liability, Protection, Werda Notary.Abstract
This study aims to find out and examine how long the Notary is responsible for the deed made after the end of his term of office, as well as to find out and examine how the forms of civil liability of the Notary are to the deeds made after the end of his term of office. This type of research uses normative juridical, which is an analytical perspective. The results showed that the form of notary accountability after a Werda Notary can be divided into 3 (three) including 1) Civil liability of the Notary to the material truth of the deed he has made, 2) Civil criminal liability of the Notary to the material truth of the deed he has made, 3) Notary's responsibility in carrying out the duties of the position are based on the notary code of ethics. Werda Notary who has violated the deed he made and caused harm to the parties may be subject to legal provisions both civil and/or criminal as long as the time limit has not been exceeded as stipulated in the Civil Code Article 1967 and the Criminal Code Article 78 jo 79, if the limit the time period has expired, then the parties can legally no longer file a lawsuit and/or claim the notary's office.
References
Journals:
Gladys Octavianadya Melati. (2015). “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pendaftaran Fidusia Online Terhadap Penerima Fidusia, Jurnal Repertorium, Edition no. 3, 2015,
Ibnu Sajadi. (2015). “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Keabsahan Akta Notaris Yang dibuatnya Atas Penghadap Yang Tidak Dapat Membaca Dan Menulisâ€. Jurnal Repertarium, Edition no. 2, vol. 2, 2015.
Iva Qohari. (2022). “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Setelah Masa Jabatannya Berakhir Terhadap Semua Akta Yang Pernag Dibuatâ€. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, Volume 6 No. 1 February 2022.
Kunni Afifah. (2017). “Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Secara Perdata Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnyaâ€. Jurnal Lex Renaissance Vol.2 No.1 January 2017.
Rachmad Hendra. (2014). “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu Di Kota Pekanbaruâ€, Jurnal Hukum, Edition no.3, vol.3. 2013.
Books:
Abdul Ghofur Ansori. 2009. Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Andi Mamminanga. (2008). Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan UUJN. Tesis. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Habib Adjie. (2009). Meneropong Khasanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hans Kelsen. (1991). General Theory of Norms, terjemahan Michael Hartney. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana
Philipus M.Hadjon & Tatik Sri Djatmiati. (1997). Tentang Wewenang. Surabaya: Majalah Yuridika, Edition V.
Retnowulan Sutantio & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Salim HS. (2006). Hukum Kontrak-Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Soerjono Soekanto. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Tan Thong Kie. (2000). Studi Notariat- Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Internet:
https://matakedip1315.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/perbuatan-pidana/
Suwindarsih. www.google.com. Pasal Kontroversial UUJN
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
