Legal Implications of Notary's Responsibility for Unlawful Acts in The Making of Authentic Deeds
Abstract
Notaries as public officials are legally authorized to provide public services to the community, especially in the preparation of valid deeds that serve as flawless evidence. Article 1868 of the Civil Code stipulates that an authentic deed is a deed made in a form determined by law by or before a public official authorized for that purpose at the place where the deed was made. This thesis aims to determine the legal considerations of a Notary's unlawful acts in making authentic deeds and to determine the implications of notary liability for unlawful acts in making authentic deeds (Civil Case Study No. 259/Pdt.G/2020/PN Gin). The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The research specifications used are descriptive analysis, primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative analysis. This paper analyzes the problem with the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal responsibility. Based on the research results in this study, the Gianyar District Court delegation Number 259/Pdt.G/2020/PN Gin emphasized that notaries as public officials have full responsibility for the accuracy of the form and content of the deeds they make. In this case, the notary was deemed negligent because he made several deeds used to legalize the "borrowed name" agreement between a foreign citizen and an Indonesian citizen, which is clearly prohibited by Article 26 paragraph (2) of the UUPA. Although the deed met the formal requirements, its substance was contrary to the law so that it was null and void and lost its authenticity. This negligence fulfills the elements of an unlawful act based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code and violates the obligations of office in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary. This decision emphasizes that notaries can be held accountable for civil, administrative, and criminal matters when the deeds they make cause losses and are contrary to the law. Therefore, notaries are obliged to uphold the principles of caution, honesty, and integrity to ensure that every deed is formally and substantially valid, so as to be able to realize legal certainty and justice for the community.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Agus Toni Purnayasa, Akibat Hukum Terdegradasinya Akta Notaris yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat Pembuatan Akta Autentik, Vol.3, No.3, Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan diakses 29 September 2025, Vol. .339.
Budiyanto, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Perjanjian Nominee Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar Nomor: 259/Pdt. G/2020/Pn. Gin (Doctoral dissertation, Program Magister Kenotariatan).
Ira Alia Maerani dan Muhammad Ulil Absor Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa Di Kabupaten Kudus (Studi Kasus di Polres Kudus), Jurnal Ilmiah Sultan Agung Volume II, 2024
Mahadewi, I. G. A. I. L., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University).
Manuaba, P., Bagus, I., Parsa, I. W., Ariawan, K., & Gusti, I. (2018). Prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam membuat akta autentik (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University).
Nurmayanti, R. (2017). Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembuatan Akta Koperasi. Jurnal Akta, 4(4), 609-622.
Putra, F., & Anand, G. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Yang Dirugikan Atas Penyuluhan Hukum Oleh Notaris. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 4(2), 26-36.
Risa Hermawati, Pemalsuan Akta Autentik yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1003 K/PID/2015), Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol.2, No.2 (Juli 2020), p.164.
Books:
Andi Hamzah, 2005, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia
Artidjo Alkostar, 2015, Korupsi Politik di Negara Moderen, UII Press, Yogyakarta
Asshiddiqie, J & Safa’at, A, 2006, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Sekretariat Jendral dan kepaniteraan Mahkama Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta
Chairul Huda, 2006, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Kencana, Jakarta
Gustav Radbruch, Filsafat Hukum (Diterjemahkan oleh Teguh Prasetyo & Rachmat Setiawan), Cetakan Ketiga, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Muttaqien, Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, 2016, hlm. 138Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Jakarta, Rajawali Pers
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.
Sri Sumawarni, 2012, Sebuah Seri Metode Penelitian Hukum, UPT UNDIP Press, Semarang
Teguh Prasetyo, 2016, Hukum Pidana, PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Topo Santoso. Membumikan Hukum Pidana Islam: Penegakan Syari’at dalam Wacana dan Agenda, Gema Insani Press, Jakarta, 2003
Zainal Abidin Farid, 2007, Hukum Pidana I, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, hlm 225Amir Ilyas, 2012, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan, Yogyakarta, Penerbit Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP Indonesia, 2012.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004.
Civil Code (KUH Perdata)
Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.7.4.329-337
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:







