The Notary Responsibility for Making A Power of Attorney to Sell on Subsidized Housing Loans to Debtors Who Default

Nur Imita Dachlan

Abstract


The notary makes a power of attorney to sell on the binding of subsidized housing loans is a legal act that has been in accordance with the law on his authority to make an authentic deed and has been based on the wishes of the appearers. However, in practice, the power of attorney (in this case, the debtor of subsidized housing loans) when there is a default, the debtor sues the notary deed to be canceled or cancelled. This study aims to identify and analyze the responsibility of the Notary for making a power of attorney to sell on subsidized housing loans to debtors who default. The research approach method used in this thesis is a normative juridical legal research method. This research specification uses descriptive analysis. The type of data used in this research is primary data which includes the Civil Code; Permenkumham No. 17 of 2021; Letter of Exit from the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as secondary data containing books and other supporting documents. Collecting research data with interview techniques and study of documents or library materials. The data analysis method used in analyzing the data is a qualitative analysis of the interactive model. The results of the study show that: (1) The authority of the Notary to make a power of attorney to sell on subsidized housing loans is appropriate based on the Exit Letter of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 4398/17.3-300/XI/2011. (2) The Notary's responsibility as a public official if proven guilty of making a power of attorney to sell a house on a subsidized housing loan, then based on the Law on Notary Position, the deed in question only has the power of proof as a private deed.


Keywords


Loans; Mortgage; Power; Selling; Subsidized.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Agustina, Rosa. (2003). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum. Skripsi. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Edwar., dkk. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau Dari Konsep Equity Before The Law. Jurnal. Hukum & Pembangunan 49. Vol. 180-201. No. 1.

Fajriyah, Nurjanatul. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur (Bank) dan Debitur (Nasabah) dalam Perjanjian Kredit tanpa Agunan (KTA) Bank X. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan. Vol.36. No. 2.

H, Sinaga. (2015). Tanggung jawab Werda Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal. Premise Law Jurnal. vol.6. No.1–12.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (1993). Pemerintah Menurut Hukum (Wet-en rechmatig Bestuur). Cetakan Pertama. Yuridika. Surabaya.

Kurniasari, Mei Ayu. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan di Kabupaten Semarang. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Nurkharisma, Dina., Dkk. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Perjanjian Dibawah Tangan Yang Telah Dilegalisasi Yang Mengandung Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal. Notarius. Vol. 13 No. 2.

Ramadhan, Chesa. (2019). Urgensi Mitigasi Risiko Dalam Perjanjian Pelaksanaan Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Di Indonesia. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan. Universitas Airlangga.

Simamora, Yohanes Sogar. (2019). Pokok-pokok Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum. seminar workshop “Penataran Hukum Keperdataanâ€. Universitas Islam Bandung.

Soegianto. (2003). Tanggung Jawab Pendiri Dan Notaris dalam Kaitannya Dengan Penyetoran Modal Untuk Pembuatan Akta Pendirian Perseroan. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan. Universitas Diponegoro.

Tanuatmaja, Bendhard. (2019). Pembatalan Lelang Karena Pelanggaran Penentuan Nilai Limit. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan. Universitas Airlangga.

Wibowo, Arif. (2020) Pertimbangan Hakim atas Adanya Surat Kuasa Jual Menjual Agunan Kredit Dalam Perkara kredit Macet Perkara No. 38/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Skt Di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta. Skripsi. Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Books:

Adjie, Habib. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Assegaf, Ahmad Fikri. (2014). Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Klausula Baku. Pusat Studi. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia.

Bakarbessy, Leonora dan Ghansham Anand. (2018). Buku Ajar Hukum Perikatan. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara.

Djojodirjo, M.A. Moegni. (1979). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Fuady, Munir. (2005). Profesi Mulia (Etika Profesi Hukum bagi Hakim. Jaksa. Advokat. Notaris. Kurator dan Pengurus). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

HS, Salim. (2018). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. cetakan pertama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Setiawan, R. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Binacipta.

Subekti. R. (1999). Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.

--------------. (2014). Aneka Perjanjian. cet ke-14. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.616-632

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image