The Juridical Analysis of Notary/PPAT Responsibilities who Do Not Pay BPHTB Tax
Abstract
One of the potential sources of tax revenue that needs to be explored according to the current economic situation and condition as well as the development of the nation is the type of Customs Tax on Land and Building Rights, hereinafter abbreviated as BPHTB. The transfer of rights to land and buildings can occur due to a legal act or legal event. One of the legal actions that can cause the transfer of rights to land and buildings is through buying and selling. The existence of the transfer of rights must be proven by an authentic deed made by or before the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT). The transfer of rights to land and buildings through the sale and purchase gives rise to tax obligations for the parties, namely Income Tax (PPh) for the seller and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) for the buyer. The purpose of this paper is to describe the legality of the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) as a public official and the juridical implications of PPAT who receive the custody of Income Tax (PPh) and Customs for the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) from taxpayers. The method used to examine these problems is normative legal research using a statute approach to examine the laws and regulations related to the legal issues being studied. The legality of the act of receiving the power to pay taxes by PPAT as a public official actually does not yet exist, in other words, a definite rule has not been established that regulates the act of receiving the power to deposit taxes by PPAT. Then regarding the juridical implications of PPAT who receive PPh and BPHTB tax deposits from taxpayers, even though the act does not have legal legality, its implementation is still included in the legal category because the act departs from the habits that have been in effect so far and is accepted by the community. As long as there is no legal regulation to realize the legality of this act, during that time this habit will continue, although there is no guarantee of legal protection for this act, but as long as it does not cause harm to anyone, it is considered not a problem. The BPHTB fee entrusted by the client to the Notary as the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT), allows for opportunities for fraud by not paying or embezzling the BPHTB funds deposited. The results show that the deed of sale and purchase that has been made by PPAT is valid even though the taxes arising from the transfer of rights to the land and buildings have not been paid. Parties who do not pay taxes arising from the transfer of land and building rights have debts to the state and may be subject to administrative sanctions in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Andi Indah Rizky Y, 2017, Tanggungjawwab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pemungutan Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah Dan Bangunan Di Kota Makassar, Jurnal Akta.
I Gusti Agung Dhenita Sari, 2017, Kewenangan Notaris Dan PPAT Dalam Proses Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan Atas Tanah Hak Milik, Mahasiswa Magister Kenotarian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Acta Comitas.
I Gusti Agung Putra Wiryawan, 2018, Pengaturan Tentang Pengenaan Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (BPHTB) Atas Hibah Wasiat. Mahasiswa Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Acta Comitas.
Sari, Devi Nurmala (2017) Analisis Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Penggelapan Titipan Uang Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (BPHTB) Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris-PPAT, Jurnal Mahasiswa, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Books:
Adami Chazawi, (2007), Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta
Johni Ibrahim, (2007). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, cet. III, Bayumedia Publishing Malang,
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta,
R. Subekti, (1979), Hukum Pembuktian, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
R. Subekti, (1982), Aneka Perjanjian, Bandung, Alumni,
Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, (2007), Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tujuan Singkat, Cet. 10, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada,
Regulation:
Act No. 20 of 2000 concerning amendments to Act No. 21 of 1997 concerning Customs on Acquisition of Land and Building Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 130 of 2000. Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 3988)
Act No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage on Land and Objects Related to Land.
Act No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (State Gazette of 1960 No. 104 and Supplement to State Gazette No. 2043)
Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 concerning the Regulation of the Position of the Official Making Land Deeds.
Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 1 of 2006 concerning Provisions for the Implementation of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 concerning the Regulation of the Position of Officials making Land Deeds
Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 1 of 2006 concerning Provisions for the Implementation of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 concerning the Regulation of the Position of Land Deed Maker Officials.
Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2010 concerning Service Standards and Land Regulations Regulation of the State Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of the National Land Agency No. 3 of 1997 concerning Provisions for Implementation of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.498-506
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in: