The Legal Position of Notary Covernote on Credit Agreement When Bad Credit Occurs

Adi Yusman, Widhi Handoko, Rakhmat Bowo Suharto

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to analyze: 1) The legal position of a notary covernote in a credit agreement in the event of bad credit at Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pangkal Pinang. 2). The process of settling bad loans in a credit agreement based on a notary covernote at Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pangkal Pinang. The approach method used in this study is an empirical juridical approach. The research specification used is descriptive analytical research. This type of data uses primary data and secondary data with library research and interview collection methods. The data analysis method used in this research is descriptive analysis. The results of the study concluded: 1) The legal position of a notary covernote in a credit agreement in the event of bad credit at Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pangkal Pinang is that the covernote is used as the basis for credit disbursement. Notary covernotes should not be used as the basis for credit disbursement, because basically covernotes are only temporary guarantees. A covernote made by a notary is usually only a statement that the certification process is still ongoing. Covernote does not have a legal umbrella because it is not regulated in laws and regulations, both the Banking Law and UUJN, so that the consequences that will then be caused by the existence of this covernote apply legal provisions both criminally and civilly. 2). The process of settling bad loans in a credit agreement based on a notary covernote at Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pangkal Pinang is completed through litigation/lawsuits to court. Notary G was proven to have committed a criminal act of corruption together and was detrimental to the state. In the decision of the Notary Court, they must be criminally responsible and fined. The use of a notary covernote in a credit agreement is basically not prohibited and is possible under the Banking Law and the Mortgage Law. In the event of non-performing loans before the issuance of mortgage rights, the bank only serves as a concurrent creditor. Legal protection for banks is based on Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code. In the event of non-performing loans before the issuance of mortgage rights, the bank only serves as a concurrent creditor. Legal protection for banks is based on Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Civil Code.

Keywords


Credit; Covernote; Mortgage; Notary.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Dicky Ardiansyah. Anis Mashdurohatun. dan Munsharif Abdul Chalim. Pembuatan Akta Otentik Pembagian Warisan Tanah oleh Notaris. Jurnal Akta. Volume 8 Nomor 1. Maret 2021.

Dicky Irfandi. Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra dan Siti Hajati Hoesin. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Covernote Berkaitan Dengan Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Hukum. Volume 1. Nomor 001 . Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. 2019.

Gusti Ayu Putu Wulan Pradnyasari, I Made Arya Utama, Kedudukan Hukum Covernote Notaris Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bank dalam Perjanjian Kredit, Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Volume 3 Nomor 3 , Desember 2018.

Heny Pratiwi. Kekuatan Hukum Covernote Melalui Pemberian Kredit Bank dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Apabila Terjadi Kredit Macet . Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan. Volume 4 Nomor 3 Desember 2019.

I Ketut Sukawati Lanang Putra Perbawa. Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Dalam Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar.

Juliyanto. D. W. & Imanullah. M. N “Problematika Covernote Notaris Sebagai Pegangan Bank Untuk Media Realisasi Pembiayaan/Kredit Dalam Dunia Perbankanâ€. Jurnal Repertorium. Volume 5. Nomor 2. 2017.

Nadya Tahsya. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Atas Covernote Yang Dikeluarkan Yang Menjadi Suatu Dasar Kepercayaan Suatu Bank. Jurnal Notary UI. Volume 2 Nomor 4 Tahun 2020.

Pande Nyoman Putra Widiantara. Sagung Wiratni Darmadi. Akibat Hukum Covernote Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Kertha Semaya Journal Ilmu Hukum. Volume 7 Nomor 8. Tahun 2019.

Rahmiah Kadir. Farida Patittingi. Nurfaidah Said. Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra. Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Pada Penerbitan Covernote. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Volume 31. Nomor 2. Juni 2019

Silvia Anggraini. Akibat Hukum Pencairan Kredit Yang Didasarkan Pada Covernote Notaris. Recital Review. Vol. 2 No.2 Tahun 2020.

Singgih Budiyono. Gunarto. Akibat Hukum Covernote Yang Dijadikan Dasar Perjanjian Kredit Di Perbankan. Jurnal Akta. Volume 4 Nomor 4 Desember 2017.

Tiska Pomantow. Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Melalui Pengadilan. Journal Lex et Societatis. Volume 1Nomor 1/Jan-Mrt/2013. hal. 10

Books:

Abdul Ghofur Anshori. (2009). Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia. Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. UII Press: Yogyakarta.

Andi Prajitno. (2010). Apa dan Siapa Notaris di Indonesia?. Cetakan Pertama. Surabaya: Putra Media Nusantara.

G.H.S Lumban Tobing. (2001). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Habib Adjie. (2008). Hukum Kenotariatan di Indonesia-Tafsiran Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama: Bandung.

Hartanti Sulihandari dan Nisya Rifiani. (2013). Prinsip – Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas.

Roeslan Saleh. (1999). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Salim HS. dan H. Abdullah. (2007). Perancangan Kontrak dan MOU. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Taufik Makarao. (2004). Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Regulation:

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

HIR.

Civil Code.

Act No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking.

Act No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Act No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption

Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions.

Act No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.433-445

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image