The Execution of Third Party Mortgage Guarantees in Rural Bank Credit Agreements

Rizka Rian Ananda, Umar Ma'ruf

Abstract


This study aims to determine the execution of mortgage guarantees on bank credit agreements belonging to third parties at Rural Banks. The Method approach in this research is empirical juridical with primary and secondary research data taken by interview and literature review. Data analysis method using qualitative analysis. The results of the study indicate that the execution of mortgage rights belonging to third parties in BPR X is in accordance with the rules in Article 1 and Article 6 of Act No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and carried out by the KPKNL. The execution of mortgage rights belonging to third parties in the BPR credit agreement in the event of a fight must be able to show proof of ownership but the execution process must still be carried out. Legal remedies for third parties as owners of land rights that are used as objects of mortgage rights are that they can file a lawsuit or derden verzet to the District Court, although this method cannot in principle suspend execution (Article 207 paragraph (3) HIR and 227 RBg) especially if from the start the third party agrees that the land is used as collateral for mortgage rights.


Keywords


Execution; Guarantee; Mortgage; Party; Third.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

A Chuasanga, Ong Argo Victoria. (2019). Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia and Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Vol 2, No 1 (2019) http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/4218

Andika Tanaya Setiadi, (2020), Analisis Upaya Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Eksekusi Benda Jaminan, NOTARIUS, Vol. 13, No. 1

Aqidatul Izza, (2017), Peran Historis Perbankan Dalam Perekonomian Indonesia. Dinar Jurnal Prodi Ekonomi Syari’ah, Vol. 1 No. 1, September 2017

Ashadil Diab, “Perjanjian Kredit Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (Telaah Terhadap Penerapan Perkreditan Bpr Latunru Latinro)â€, in Jurnal Al-‘Adl Vol. 10, No. 1, Januari 2017

David Adrian, (2014), Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Objek Hak Tanggungan Dari Upaya Sita Jaminan Oleh Pihak Ketiga, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. 1, No. 2

Heru Sugiyono, (2017), Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemilik Jaminan Ketika Tidak Dilaksanakannya Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Oleh Bank Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Memakai Jamina, Jurnal Yuridis Vol. 4 No. 1

Muh Akbar Ariz Purnomo, (2014), “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemberi Hak Tanggungan yang Bukan Debitur Dalam Perjanjian Kredit†in Unnes Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1

Ong Argo Victoria, Ade Riusma Ariyana, Devina Arifani. (2020). Code of Ethics and Position of Notary in Indonesia. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review 2 (4), 397-407, http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/SANLaR/article/view/13536

Puguh Indro Paksiko, (2019), Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Dengan Objek Milik Pihak Ketiga Di BPR Purwa Artha Purwodadi, UMS Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 3

Books:

Muhamad Djumhana, (2000), Hukum Perbankan Di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti

Pandu Suharto, (2001), Peran, Masalah, dan Prospek Bank Perkreditan Rakyat, Jakarta: LPPI

Rachmadi Usman, (2008), Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perbankan Di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Thomas Suyatno, (2001), Kelembagaan Perbankan, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Internet:

Ni Putu Eka, (2020), “Kredit Macet BPR mencapai angka 8,34 Persen†in www.bisnis.id , accessed on 31 September 2021




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.4.1220-1227

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image