The Position of Debtor Legal Protection for Bankruptcy of Separatist Creditors

Herman Yusuf, Achmad Sulchan, Umar Ma'ruf, R. Sugiharto

Abstract


The position of the debtor who is bankrupted by the preference rights of the creditor results in injustice, especially in terms of the legal protection of the debtor. The revision of Act No. 4 of 1998 to Act No. 37 of 2004 contained a conflict of norms in it. The purpose of this research is to analyze and find out: 1).Implementation of debtor legal protection against bankruptcy carried out by current separatist creditors. 2). Factors that affect the implementation of legal protection for debtors against bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors. 3) Implementation of legal protection for debtors for bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors. The approach method in this research was normative juridical. The data used was secondary data obtained through literature study, data analysis was carried out by analytical descriptive. The results of the research concluded: 1) The implementation of debtor legal protection for bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors currently as intended by Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 has not been fair to debtors, considering that the two articles are only based on the existence of debt from the debtor and related to the position of the solvent or insolvency based on the view of the creditor alone. This is clearly the case because Act No. 37 of 2004 does not adhere to a balance sheet test system where before being declared bankrupt it is necessary to test the condition of the debtor whether it is really insolvent or actually still solvent. 2) Factors influencing the implementation of debtor legal protection for bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors are legal factors, namely the existence of provisions in Article 55 and Article 56 of Act No. 37 of 2004 which are unfair to debtors, legal implementation factors are in the form of a culture judges as mouthpieces of the law even though it is well known that the door to justice in bankruptcy cases is the judge's decision. 3) Implementation of debtor legal protection for bankruptcy carried out by separatist creditors which should be in order to realize protection for debtors related to the execution of parate by creditors, it is necessary to renew the concept of bankruptcy law in Indonesia. 

Keywords


Creditor; Debtor; Protection; Separatist.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Dessy Andiyaningsih, Umar Ma’ruf, Pengalihan Hak Tanggungan Pada Perbankan Di Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Jurnal Akta, Vol 5 No. 1, 2018, Unissula, Semarang;

Sri Rejeki, Perlindungan Hukum Dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Hal Terjadi Kepailitan Terhadap Debitor, Jurnal Ilmiah, Vol.12 No.1, 2006, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta;

Binov Handitya, Redesign The Relevance Of Justice In Debtor Protection Related To Parate Executions Performed By Separate Creditors In Liability Agreements, Jurnal Akta, Volume 8 No. 4, December 2021;

Didi Sukardi, The Legal Responsibility Of Debtor To Payment Curators In Bankruptcy Situation, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume 8, Number 2, August 2021;

Doni Budiono, Analisis Pengaturan Hukum Acara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, JHAPER: Vol. 4, No. 2, July – December 2018;

Gregorius Yoga Panji Asmara, Protection Relevance of the Execution of Separatic Creditors Based on Pancasila Justice, Jurnal Akta, Volume 8 No. 1, March 2021;

I Ketut Gde Swara Siddhi Yatna, Ni Putu Purwanti, Perbandingan Hukum Negara Indonesia Dengan Hukum Negara Belanda Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Sisa Hutang Debitor Pailit, ACTA COMITAS, Vol 5 No 2 August 2020;

Irianto, C, Penerapan Asas Kelangsungan Usaha Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol 4 No 3 2015;

Books:

Andreas Albertus, 2010, Hukum Fidusia, Selaras, Malang

Esmi Warassih, 2010, Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Henny Tanuwidjaja, 2012, Pranata Hukum Jaminan Utang dan Sejarah Lembaga Hukum Notariat, Refika Aditama, Bandung

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2017, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta

Regulation:

Act No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Receivable Payment Obligations.

Act No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles

Internet:

https://www.Hukumonline.com/ Pusatdata/detail/320/node/19/undangundang-nomor-4-tahun-1998/, accessed on September 4, 2021.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.2.705-714

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:

Image Image Image Image Image