The Juridical Study Claims for Cancellation of Insurance Rights Auction Execution
Abstract
This study aims to examine the issue of the lawsuit for canceling the execution of credit guarantee auctions that are burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number 64/Pdt.G/2018/PN Byl. Reviewing Judges' Considerations in Deciding Cases on Claims for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. Reviewing the Legal Consequences of Lawsuits for Cancellation of Execution of Mortgage Auctions. This research is a normative juridical research. This research focuses on document or library research which essentially looks for theories, views that have correlation and are relevant to the problems to be studied. The results of the study concluded that the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the credit guarantee auction that was burdened with mortgage rights in the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl, which starts with the provision of Local Credit Facilities (Current Accounts) with a credit limit not exceeding IDR 1,700,000,000.00 (one billion seven hundred million rupiah), based on Credit Agreement No. 125/PK/KRED/SLA/2008 dated October 13, 2008, and has been amended and updated several times, most recently by Amendment to Credit Agreement No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015 dated October 6, 2015, and has been extended several times, most recently with the Notification of Extension of Period No. 145/AD/KRED/SLA/2015. 00118/SLA/SPPJ/2017 dated October 12, 2017. However, during the credit agreement period, the Plaintiff defaulted because he did not make installments every month, so Defendant I had given warning letters 3 times, therefore Defendant I through Defendant II carried out an auction execution of the object of credit guarantee that had been registered with the Mortgage Rights. The judge's consideration in deciding the lawsuit for the cancellation of the execution of the mortgage auction that was burdened with Mortgage was based on the exception of Defendant I and the evidence presented at the trial, which showed that the auction of the execution of the mortgage on the Collateral Object had been carried out in accordance with Article 22 PMK No. 27/PMK.06/2016, namely by the Class I Auction Officer at the Surakarta KPKNL is legally valid. The legal consequences of the Boyolali District Court Decision Number: 64/Pdt. G/2018/PN Byl that the auction of Mortgage Execution conducted by Defendant I and Defendant II of the collateral that is guaranteed by the credit agreement through the Surakarta State Property and Auction Service Intermediary Office (KPKNL) is legal according to law. The legal consequence for the Plaintiff is the obligation to pay court fees.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Aryo Dharmajaya, 2009, Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Lelang Atas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Tidak Dapat Dimiliki oleh Pemenang Lelang (Analisis Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 158k/Pdt/2005), Tesis, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Andhyka Muchtar, 2014, Eksistensi dan Kedudukan Kreditur Hak Tanggungan dalam Kepailitan, Jurnal Repertorium, Edisi 2, July-December 2014.
Dwi Nugrohandhin, 2019, Akibat Hukum Gugatan Dan Perlawanan Terhadap Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, Jurnal Ilmu hukum, Volume 4, Nomor 1 of 2019.
Imma Indra Dewi Windajani, 2011, Hambatan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang Yogyakarta, Mimbar Hukum, Special Edition, November 2011.
Maria S.W. Sumardjono, 1997, Kredit Perbankan Permasalahannya Dalam Kaitannya dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan, Jurnal Hukum (Ius Quia lustum), No. 7 Vol. 4 of 1997.
Tri Kurniawan, “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Objek Jaminan dalam Perjanjian Hak Tanggungan,†Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, Vol.4 of 2016.
Books:
A.P Parlindungan, 1996, Komentar Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Tanggungan dan Sejarah Terbentuknya, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Andrian Sutedi, 2010, Hukum Hak Tanggungan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Boedi Harsono, 2002, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Himpunan Peraturan-Peraturann Hukum Tanah, Djambatan, Jakarta.
Budi Harsono, 2007, Hukum Agraria Indonesia, (Sejarah Pembentukan, Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya), Djambatan, Jakarta.
C.S.T Kansil dan Christine ST Kansil, 1997, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
C.S.T Kansil dan Christine ST Kansil, 1997, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta.
Cik Hasan Bisri, 1998, Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Djoni S. Gazali dan Rachmadi Usman, 2012, Hukum Perbankan, ctk. II, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Evi Ariyani, 2013, Hukum Perjanjian, ctk. Pertama, Ombak, Yogyakarta.
FX. Ngadijarno dan Nunung Eko Laksito, Teori dan Praktek Lelang, Modul BPPK Departemen Keuangan RI, http://www. bppk. depkeu.go.id/index.php/lelang-teori-dan-praktek/view-category.html, Diakses Tanggal 11 Oktober 2020, Jam 21.30 WIB.
Habib Adjie, 2000, Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Lembaga Jaminan Atas Tanah, ctk. I, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Herlien Budiono, B, 2011, Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
HR. Daeng Naja, 2005, Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
http://www.pengertianartidefinisi.com/2015/10/pengertian-hukum-yuridis/, diakses pada tgl 09 Mei 2021, pukul 14:00 WIB
I Made Soewandi, 2005, Balai Lelang, Kewenangan Balai Lelang dalam Penjualan Jaminan Kredit Macet, Yayasan Gloria, Yogyakarta.
Ignatius Ridwan, 1996, Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah, Badan Penerbit Undip, Semarang.
J. Satrio, 2004, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Hak Tanggungan, Buku II, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Kartini Muljadi-Gunawan Widjaja, 2005, Seri Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Pada Umumnya, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Kashadi, 2000, Hak Tanggungan dan Jaminan Fidusia, Fakultas Hukum UNDIP, Semarang, hlm. 19.
Lon Fuller dalam tesishukum.com/pengertian-asas-kepastian-hukum-menurut-para- ahli/diunduh pukul 11.32 WIB tanggal 15 November 2020
M. Bahsan, 2010, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Cet.ke 3, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
M. Khoidin, 2005, Problematika Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, LaksBang Pressindo, Yogyakarta.
M. Yahya Harahap, 1989, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan eksekusi dibidang Perdata, Gramedia, Jakarta.
Mariam Darius Badrulzaman, 2009, Kompilasi Hukum Jaminan, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Muhammas Djumhana, 2000, Hukum Perbankan Di Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Mulyadi, 1996, Tuntutan Provisionil Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Djambatan.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Purnama Tioria Sianturi, 2008, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Barang Jaminan Tidak Bergerak Melalui Lelang, Penerbit Mandar Maju, Bandung.
R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio, 1986, Pasal 1338, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta Pusat.
Rochmat Soemitro, 2000, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pajak dan Pajak Pendapatan, Eresoo, Jakarta.
Salbiah, 2004, Materi Pokok Pengetahuan Lelang, Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Perpajakan, Jakarta.
Salim HS, 2017, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sudargo Gautama, 1998, Komentar atas Peraturan Kepailitan Baru, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2002, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Surayin, 2005, Analisis Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Bandung, Yrama Widya.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 1999, Hak Tangungan Azas-Azaz Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok dan Masalah yang Dihadapi oleh Perbankan, Suatu Kajian Mengenai Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan, Alumni, Bandung.
Sutarno, 2009, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan pada Bank, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sutiarnoto, 2018, Peraturan Hukum Lelang di Indonesia, Medan, USU Press.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1999, Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian, Sumur, Bandung.
Yulfasni, 2010, Hukum Kontrak, Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas Padang.
Regulations:
Civil law Code
Act No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights
Act No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking
Boyolali District Court Decision Number 64/Pdt.G/2018/PN Byl
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.2.354-378
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:
