Solutions for the Legality of Child Legal Actions in Making of the Notary Deed and PPAT Deed
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and assess the legal arrangements for legal acts of children in the practice of notary duties and positions in the perspective of the Notary Position Law, as well as obstacles and solutions to its implementation. This study used a sociological juridical approach with descriptive analysis characteristics. Sources of data used in this study include primary data taken using interviews and secondary data with documentation studies, data analyzed using qualitative descriptive. Based on the research, it is concluded that the legal actions of a new child can be declared valid if the child is 18 years old, but in practice, notaries only serve the making of notary deeds for those who are 18 years old, while PPAT deed services are only intended for those who are 21 years old. The difference in service is the difference in age because of the existenceRegulation of the Head of the National Land Agency which enforces a minimum age of 21 years for PPAT deeds, according to the provisions of the Civil Code (BW). The Regulation of the Head of BPN is an obstacle to the application of UUJN and even makes UUJN have no legal certainty, it is also against the constitution and other laws of a higher degree. As a solution, the notary divides the deed into two parts, namely the notary makes a deed for 18 years old in the form of a notary deed, and for those who are 21 years old, besides a notary deed, a PPAT deed can also be made.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Ruben Achmad. (2005). Upaya Penyelesaian Masalah Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum di Kota Palembang, Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Nomor 27-X, January.
Books:
Suharnoko. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian, Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group.
Suherman, Ade Maman and J. Satrio. (2010). Penjelasan Hukum tentang Batasan Umur, Jakarta : Nasional Legal Reform Program.
Maidin Gultom. (2008). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Kansil. (1999). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Sholih Mu’adi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah Perkebunan Melalui Cara Non Litigasi (Suatu Studi Litigasi Dalam Situasi Transisional), Disertasi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2008, p. v-vi.
J. Satrio.(1999). Hukum Pribadi Bagian I Persoon Alamiah, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Pernyatakan BPN tidak tunduk kepada UUJN, dapat diartikan bahwa BPN dalam melakukan pendaftaran tanah hanya tunduk kepada KUH Perdata atau Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie (BW) Warisan Kolonia Belanda.
Utrecht, E. (1959). Pengantar Dalam Hukun Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Penerbit dan Balai Buku " Ichtiar ", cet. V.
Lawrence M. Friedman. (1977). Law and Society, an introduction, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Achmad Ali (2008). Menguak Realitas Hukum, Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Soediman Kartohadiprodjo (1967). Pengantar Tata Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Penerbit PT Pembangunan, V, I S.
Pitlo (1971). A Het Systeem van het Nederlandse Privaatrecht, terjemahan J. Satrio, H.D. Tjeenk Wilink, Groningen.
Interview:
Interview With Abd. Jalil Hamzah, SH., M.Kn. Notary and PPAT, domiciled in Cirebon Regency, on July 11, 2020.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.474-489
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in: