Reformulation of Political Party Support Requirements for Presidential Candidacy in Realizing an Aristocratic State in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v9i1.50523Kata Kunci:
Aristocratic State, Meritocracy, Oligarchy, Political Parties, Presidential ThresholdAbstrak
This research aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating political party support requirements for presidential candidacy to mitigate oligarchic dominance in Indonesia while realizing a modern aristocratic state. The study employs a normative juridical approach integrated with a socio-legal approach, utilizing a descriptive-analytical research specification. Secondary data, including the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 7 of 2017, and recent Constitutional Court decisions, were analyzed qualitatively through document studies and international institutional comparisons. The findings indicate that the current quantitative presidential threshold has fostered political cartelization and restricted the emergence of competent alternative leaders by prioritizing financial capital over statesmanship. As a primary conclusion, this study offers novelty by proposing the Merit-Based Party Endorsement System (MBPES) as an alternative institutional design. This model reinterprets the concept of modern aristocracy not as hereditary rule, but as governance by individuals possessing superior moral and intellectual virtues. The research's novelty lies in shifting the nomination criteria from mere parliamentary seat counts to qualitative indicators, including internal party meritocracy, deliberative public scrutiny, and an independent epistemic filter. This reformulation is vital to fill the normative vacuum following Constitutional Court Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024, ensuring that presidential candidates are selected based on objective ethical integrity and leadership capacity. Ultimately, this approach is expected to restore constitutional dignity and align the electoral process with the principles of substantive Pancasila democracy in Indonesia.
Referensi
Anwar, M., & Fahrazi, M. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Penerapan Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia (Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017). Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 230–235.
Aristotle. (1984). Politics (C. Lord (trans.)). University of Chicago Press.
Aven, G. (2025). Putusan MK dan Evaluasi Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden: Arah Revisi UU Pemilu dan Dampaknya terhadap Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i10.2054
Baan, B. B. (2025). Constitutionality of Presidential Threshold Application in Indonesia’s Presidential Election System: Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Research Horizon, 5(5), 2243–2262. https://doi.org/10.56370/rh.v5i5.850
Déloye, Y. (2014). Candidate Endorsement and Political Legitimacy in France. French Politics, 12(2).
Djojoatmodjo, S. (2025). Politics of Legal Presidential Threshold Dilemma: Pillar of Democracy or Barn of Oligarchy and The Eliminator of Presidential Threshold. Critical Legal Review, 2(2), 134–149.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. MIT Press.
Hapsari, Y. D. P., & Saraswati, R. (2023). Dampak Pelaksanaan Presidential Threshold pada Pemilu Serentak terhadap Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.70-84
Landa, D., & Pevnick, R. (2025). Political Meritocracy and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 28(1), 253–271.
Lubis, A. S. S., Damayanti, G. A. R., & Karyati, S. (2023). Ambang Batas Presiden Pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak. Unizar Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v6i2.58
Mietzner, M. (2013). Money, Power, and Ideology in Indonesian Politics. ISEAS.
Myaskur, M. (2023). Politik Hukum Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Riset Hukum.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Sandel, M. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Setiawan, A. H. (2023). Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.64
Shin, G.-W. (2006). Democratization and Party Reform in South Korea. Journal of Democracy, 17(1).
Sistyawan, D. J. (2024). Legal Reformulation of Legislative Elections in Realizing Pancasila Democracy in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 12(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.12.2.120-134
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Wiraguna, S. A., & Fakrulloh, Z. A. (2023). Legal Reforms in Indonesia Related to “Presidential Threshold” of Presidential Candidate in Law No. 7/2017 Concerning General Elections. Ius Positum: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement, 58–69.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
