The Role of Judicial Commission on Supervision of Judge’s Crime in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i4.3931Abstrak
This booklet is designed to examine the effectiveness of the Judicial Commission's role in the supervision of judge’s crime in Indonesia, as well as existence. Based on the discussion, we can conclude: 1) The role of the Judicial Commission in the framework of the supervision of judge’s crime has not been effective, due to the legal existence of the Judicial Commission recognized but on a practical level does not have the authority to impose administrative punishment on their own, the Judicial Commission had no authority investigations against the judge found to have violated the rules of the criminal. 2) Need for reconstruction of the existence of the Judicial Commission under the supervision of judge’s crime offense, so there is a balance between the authority of the Judicial Commission and the follow-up comprehensively.
Keywords: Judicial Commission; Supervision; Judge.Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
