Upside of Evidence by Public Prosecutor in The Case Corruption by Act No. 31 of 1999 jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 on Combating Crime of Corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i3.3399Abstrak
Corruption is a criminal offense that is remarkable. Remarkable because the mode used increasingly sophisticated, and as a result of corruption is very detrimental to the people and the state. Corruptor often me-take advantage of legal loopholes. Reverse authentication system implemented in the Act No. 31 of 1999 jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication easier for prosecutors to prove that the defendant has committed the crime of corruption. In the system of proof, the defendant has the obligation to prove that the defendant did not commit corruption, and prosecutors also continue to prove that the defendant engaged in corruption cases.
Keywords: Upside Evidence; Prosecution; Corruption.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds the copyright for each article published with work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship and early publication of the work in this journal.
- Authors must agree to the copyright transfer agreement by checking the Copyright Notice column at the initial stage when submitting the article.
- The copyright of this document is owned by Journal Master of Law UNISSULA and is protected by law
