Legal Analysis of The Legal Regulations for The Return of Confiscated Items Based on Article 133 of the Kuhap
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding the return of confiscated objects after a pretrial decision based on Article 133 of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and to examine the legal status and force of pretrial decisions in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The type of research used in this study is Normative Juridical legal research. The results of the study indicate that Article 133 of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code has basically provided a clear normative basis regarding the obligation to return confiscated objects to the entitled party if the objects are no longer needed in the evidentiary process. This provision reflects the principle of property rights protection and the principle of legal certainty in the criminal justice system. In addition, a pretrial decision declaring a confiscation invalid has binding legal force and must be implemented as a form of restoration of the original state (restitutio in integrum). However, the Criminal Procedure Code has not yet expressly regulated the mechanism for executing pretrial decisions, thus creating obstacles in their implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Andi Hamzah, Penegakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2007, hlm. 45.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, “Asas Legalitas dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Ǫuia Iustum, Vol. 18 No. 1, 2011.
__________, “Penyitaan dan Permasalahannya dalam Hukum Acara Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 49 No. 2, 2019.
Erwin Susilo, dkk., “Problematika Pengembalian Barang Bukti dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol. 6 No. 7, 2025.
Mauro Cappelletti C Bryant Garth, Access to Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978, hlm. 9.
Meki Wahyudi, Reformulasi Objek Praperadilan, Pekanbaru: UIR, 2021.
Ovaldo Sepang, “Perluasan Objek Praperadilan…”, Lex Administratum, 2018.
Books:
Andi Hamzah. (2012). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Herbert L. Packer, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
Jekson Sipayung. (2016). Analisis Putusan Praperadilan, Medan: UMA.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2016). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Philipus M. Hadjon., et al. (2010). Hukum Administrasi dan Good Governance, Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti,
Philipus M. Hadjon. (2005). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Philipus M. Hadjon. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Rhona K.M. Smith. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII,
Rian Azismi. (2019). Analisis Terhadap Perluasan Objek Praperadilan dan Prospeknya, Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Romli Atmasasmita. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Jakarta: Kencana,
Romli Atmasasmita. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Jakarta: Kencana.
Satjipto Rahardjo.(2009). Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Kompas.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
__________, (1982). Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali,
__________, (2012). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2009). Penemuan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2009). Penemuan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Tom R. Tyler. (2006). Why People Obey the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Regulation:
Republic of Indonesia, Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Law No. 20 of 2025, Article 1, number 2
Republic of Indonesia, Criminal Procedure Code, Article 133.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v9i2.53452
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:
