Legal Protection for Victims of Theft Crimes Who Take Independent Action: A Study of Justice for 'Victim-Offenders'
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal provisions regarding the rights of victims of theft to defend themselves and their property, as well as to examine the legal protection mechanisms that can prevent secondary victimization of victims in the law enforcement process. This issue is important because in the practice of criminal justice in Indonesia, there are often situations where victims of theft who resist the perpetrator are potentially prosecuted if their actions cause harm to the perpetrator. This condition shows a paradox in the criminal justice system, where victims who should receive protection instead face the risk of criminalization as a result of their acts of self-defense. This raises issues of justice and has the potential to create secondary victimization of victims through a law enforcement process that is insensitive to the position of victims. Therefore, this research is urgent to examine in more depth how Indonesian criminal law regulates self-defense and how legal protection mechanisms can be developed so that victims are not further harmed in the criminal justice process. This study uses a normative-juridical research method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach analyzed through systematic interpretation and legal content analysis of various relevant legal sources. The results of the study show that, normatively, Indonesian criminal law recognizes the concept of self-defense as a justification, but the existing regulations still leave room for broad interpretation, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty for victims who resist perpetrators of theft. In addition, victim protection mechanisms in the law enforcement process have not been fully able to prevent secondary victimization. This study concludes that there is a need to strengthen the regulatory framework, develop law enforcement guidelines that are more sensitive to victims, and adopt an approach that is more oriented towards victim protection in the criminal justice system. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis, which places victims who engage in independent resistance as the main subject of study from the perspective of legal protection and the prevention of secondary victimization in Indonesian criminal law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Abyan, M. M., & Gunawan, B. P. (2025). Pembelaan Diri Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum: Cogito Ergo Sum, 8(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.51804/jrhces.v8i2.17107
Adhyaksa, A., & Fathurrahim, F. (2025). Kondisi Materiil Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Aspek Pembentukannya Dengan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence. Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i3.2943
Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208
Bahri, S. (2021). Problema dan Solusi Peradilan Pidana yang Berkeadilan dalam Perkara Pembelaan Terpaksa. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 5(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i1.415
Bintara Sura Priambada. (2025). Kajian Viktimologi Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Kejahatan Seksual. 4(5). https://mail.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JCI/article/view/9778/7695
Capera, B. (2021). Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Paradigma Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art1
Claudio Jap, C., & Rahaditya, R. (2024). Implementasi Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana dalam Kasus Penganiayaan. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(1), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1301
Dewi, R. A., & Arifin, T. (2023). Melukai Orang Karena Membela Diri Dari Kejahatan Menurut Perspektif Hadits Bukhari Dan Pasal 49 KUHP. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 1(2), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v1i2.911
Erick Wijaya Siagian. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Jambret) Berdasarkan Perspektif KUHP di Indonesia. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(4), 6101–6111. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i4.9390
Haq, I., Wahidin, W., & Saidah, S. (2020). Melampaui Batas (Noodewwr Exces) dalam Membela Diri; Studi Perbandingan Antara Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif. Mazahibuna. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14295
Lengkong, L. Y., Situmeang, T., & Sianipar, C. N. (2025). Kontekstualisasi Konsep Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer Exces) Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. Honeste Vivere, 35(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v35i1.386
Margaret Mutiara Manurung, A. A. (2024). Analisis Pembelaan Terpaksadalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 61 K/Pid/2020. UNES Law Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4
Marselino, R. (2020). Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Pada Pasal 49 Ayat (2). Jurist-Diction, 3(2), 633. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i2.18208
Nascimento, A. M., Andrade, J., & De Castro Rodrigues, A. (2023). The Psychological Impact of Restorative Justice Practices on Victims of Crimes—A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1929–1947. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085
Noviyanti, F., & Putri, S. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Fisik Dalam Perspektif Victimology. Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology, 2(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.51825/sajv.v2i2.25483
Patricia Regina Lahe. (2017). Pembuktian Noodweer (Pembelaan Terpaksa) Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Menurut Pasal 49 Ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. 5(3). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/15856
Prakarsa, A., & Yulia, R. (2022). Examining Victim Precipitation in Determining a Suspect (A Case Study of Marital Rape That Ended in Death). Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 7(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v7i1.307
Prochorus, L. A., & Tjoneng, A. (2025). Penerapan Pasal 49 KUHP Terkait dengan Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Kasus Kejahatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(4), 3287–3299. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4450
Rizal, M., Muhammad Hatta, Sumiadi, Zulfan, & Husni. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Upaya Pembelaan Diri Korban Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(4), 890–908. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v2i4.84
Rizkianto, K. (2025). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Hak Korban Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Berbasis Keadilan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Sahdewa, I. B. H., & Hariyanto, D. R. S. (2022). Pembelaan Terpaksa Bersenjata Oleh Korban Begal Yang Mengakibatkan Hilangnya Nyawa Pelaku Begal. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(10), 2293. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i10.p08
Sembiring, P. F. S. & July Esther. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Motor. Keadilan, 23(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v23i1.2346
Siki, P. A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Perpektif Teori Viktimologi di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 8(2), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.31933/v25na303
Sintia Mona Pratama, Neng Anisa Fitri Nurdiani, Salha Aulia, Muhammad Reyhanz Nugraha, Rahmat Al Kaffi, Susan Srinovi, Siti Alia Zahra, Muhammad Fadly, & Kori Hermawanti. (2026). Moralitas Sosial dan Peran Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Politik Hukum Pidana pada Kasus Kekerasan Seksual di Kabupaten Cianjur. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v3i1.1459
Sitorus, J., Zulyadi, R., & Trisna, W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ditinjau Dari Kajian Victimlogi (Studi Putusan No: 20/Pid.B/2017/PN. Mdn). JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v2i1.232
Sumardiono, M., & Sugianto, S. (2026). Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan dalam Perspektif Viktimologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. FOCUS, 7(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.37010/fcs.v7i1.2174
Syafari, T., Fathurahim, F., & Robo, B. D. (2025). Fulfillment of Rights to Recovery for Victims of Sexual Violence Which Settlement is Made Outside the Judicial Process in Ternate City. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 8(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i2.45282
Wicaksono, T. & M Sampasihullisan. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Noodweer Excess Berdasarkan KUHAP. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipin, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.60126/jim.v3i7.1189
Yuherawan, D. (2013). Ketiadaan Fungsi Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk Melindungi Kepentingan Korban. Arena Hukum, 6(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.2
Books:
Bambang Waluyo. (2011). Viktimologi: Perlindungan Korban & Saksi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Huda, C. (2006). Dari tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan menuju kepada tiada pertanggungjawaban pidana tanpa kesalahan: Tinjauan kritis terhadap teori pemisahan tindak pidana dan pertanggungjawaban pidana (Ed. 1., cet. 1). Kencana.
Muladi, B. N. A. (2007). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Mandar Maju: Bandung.
Mulyadi, L. (2004). Kapita selekta hukum pidana kriminologi & victimologi. Djambatan.
Sri Mamudji, S. S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Rajawali Pers.
Yulia, R. (2010). Viktimologi: Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban kejahatan (Ed. 1., cet. 1). Graha Ilmu.
Internet:
Finta Rahyuni. (2026). Duduk Perkara Korban Pencurian di Deli Serdang Jadi Tersangka Usai Aniaya Pelaku. Detiksumut. https://www.detik.com/sumut/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-8345252/duduk-perkara-korban-pencurian-di-deli-serdang-jadi-tersangka-usai-aniaya-pelaku
Kompas.tv. (2026). Suami Jadi Tersangka Usai Bela Istri dari Jambret di Sleman, YLBHI Bahas “RJ”-Potensi Pemerasan. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/648065/suami-jadi-tersangka-usai-bela-istri-dari-jambret-di-sleman-ylbhi-bahas-rj-potensi-pemerasan
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51937
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in: