Double Certificates as Land Administration Defects: Parameters for Cancellation According to Government Regulation 18/2021 and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21/2020 and Their Legal Consequences
Abstract
This article discusses double/overlapping certificates as land administration defects and examines the parameters for their cancellation according to Government Regulation 18/2021 and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21/2020, while also testing how these parameters actually work in practice and court decisions. The objectives of this study are (1) to systematize the normative parameters for the cancellation of duplicate certificates as a "gateway, requirements, and safeguards" for administrative authority, (2) to formulate applicable parameters in the form of indicators of proof used in ATR/BPN practice and litigation forums (PTUN/civil) to determine which certificates should be canceled, and (3) to analyze the legal consequences of cancellation on the status of rights, the control of registration data, and the protection of third parties. This study uses a normative (doctrinal) legal method with a legislative, case, and conceptual approach; primary legal materials include Government Regulation 18/2021, Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21/2020, as well as chamber/SEMA formulations and relevant decisions; secondary materials are in the form of books and journal articles. The analysis was conducted qualitatively and normatively through the classification of legal materials, interpretation and construction of norms to develop normative parameters, reading of decisions/formulations to develop a checklist of applicable indicators (physical control, good faith, history of rights, procedural compliance, and forum selection), and drawing deductive conclusions. The results of the study show that normative parameters provide a framework for administrative correction, but in their application they shift to become operational parameters that determine the evidence and direction of the settlement forum, especially when there is a transfer of rights, a third party acting in good faith, or a burden of encumbrance. The novelty of this research lies in the systematic mapping and linking of two layers of parameters (normative-applicative) as operational measures for the cancellation of double certificates and their legal consequences in order to be more consistent and predictive.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journal:
Artika, S. D., & Silviana, A. (2025). Kepastian hukum atas pemilik tanah yang tumpang tindih akibat penerbitan sertifikat PTSL. Notarius, 18(1), 140–156. doi:10.14710/nts.v18i1.57791
Dewandaru, P. A., Hastuti, N. T., & Wisnaeni, F. (2020). Penyelesaian sengketa tanah terhadap sertifikat ganda di Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Notarius, 13(1), 154–169.
Dotulung, D. D. (2018). Pembatalan sertipikat hak atas tanah akibat cacat hukum administrasi. Lex Privatum, 6(1), 159–167.
Hufadzah, H., Santi, A. A., & Adiyanta, F. S. (2017). Pembatalan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah sebagai akibat adanya sertifikat ganda (Studi kasus wilayah administrasi Kantor Pertanahan Kota Semarang). Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(2), 1–12.
Larasati, F. R., & Bakri, M. (2019). Implementasi Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 pada putusan hakim dalam pemberian perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli beritikad baik. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4), 881–902. doi:10.31078/jk15410
Maharani, S., & Anggoro, S. (2024). Pembatalan sertipikat tanah oleh kantor pertanahan tanpa adanya putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 12(2), 223–238. doi:10.25157/galuhjustisi.v12i2.12865
Parsaulian, A. P., & Sudjito. (2019). Masalah tumpang tindih sertipikat hak milik atas tanah di Kota Banjarbaru (Putusan Nomor: 24/G/2014/PTUN.BJM). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 5(1), 129–135. doi:10.31292/jb.v5i1.324
Prakasa, A. K., Zuhir, A., & Adriansyah, A. (2020). Pembatalan sertifikat hak milik dibebani hak tanggungan akibat putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Recital Review, 2(1), 39–52.
Putra, F. M. K. (2015). Pembatalan sertipikat hak atas tanah karena cacat administratif serta implikasinya apabila hak atas tanah sedang dijaminkan. Perspektif, 20(2), 101–116.
Rosadi, B., Prasetyo, A., & Sulyati, E. (2023). Pembatalan sertifikat hak atas tanah akibat cacat administrasi. Living Law, 15(1), 68–76
Sa’diyah, A., & Aminah. (2024). Sengketa tanah bersertipikat ganda (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri No. 134/Pdt.G/2019/Pn Amb). Notarius, 17(1), 462–479.
Sarjiyati, Pradhana, A. P., Haryani, A. T., Sukarjono, B., Zulkarnain, I. F., & Rahmawati, G. A. (2024). Juridical analysis of the State Administrative Court of Surabaya’s Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY on land ownership certificate overlapping. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 14(2), 262–278. doi:10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6017
Soediro, Faridli, E. M., & Dwiana, D. A. (2021). Settlement of double certificate cases in Bandung (Case study of judge’s decision number: 976k/Pdt/2015). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 21(3), 512–519. doi:10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.3431
Sudirga, I. M. (2020). Eksistensi program Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) dalam mencegah terbitnya sertipikat ganda di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 2(1), 1–15.
Books:
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Harsono, B. (2008). Hukum agraria Indonesia: Sejarah pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, isi dan pelaksanaannya (Jilid 1). Djambatan.
Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori & metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayu Media.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana
Parlindungan, A. P. (1999). Pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia: Berdasarkan PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 dilengkapi dengan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Mandar Maju.
Santoso, U. (2015). Pendaftaran dan peralihan hak atas tanah. Kencana.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (1999). Hak tanggungan: Asas-asas, ketentuan-ketentuan pokok dan masalah yang dihadapi oleh perbankan (Edisi revisi). Alumni.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Regulations:
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Banjarmasin. (2014). Putusan Nomor 24/G/2014/PTUN.BJM.
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya. (2023). Putusan Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY.
Republik Indonesia. (1960). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Republik Indonesia. (1997). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Satuan Rumah Susun, dan Pendaftaran Tanah.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2016). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2016 sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2018). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2018 sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51337
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:
Editorial Office: RUMAH JURNAL FH UNISSULA (RJFHU) 2nd Floor, Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia.
Email: jdh@unissula.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).