ONE SOLUTION OF DIGITIZING LAND SERVICES TO PREVENT LAND MAFIA IN NIGERIA

Penulis

  • Olatunji Austine Kehinde Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology ikere-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v11i1.35902

Kata Kunci:

Land, Mafia, Problem.

Abstrak

This research aims to analyze the solution of digitizing land services to prevent land mafia. The approach method used in this research is a sociological juridical approach. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive research. This type of data uses primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature study. The data analysis method used in this research is descriptive analysis. The research results were concluded: 1). The implementation of digitization of land services is carried out through a special agrarian internet site. Currently, the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs has implemented four digital land services, including Electronic Mortgage Rights, checking certificates, Land Registration Certificates, and Land Value Zone information. There are two electronic services that will be added by the AGRARIAN Ministry, namely land sale and purchase deeds and transfer of rights. The implementation of digitalization of land services at AGRARIAN AGENCY Nigeria, apart from using a special agrarian internet site, is also carried out through the Touch application. Touch My Land is an application created to answer various community land problems. 2) The effectiveness of digitizing land services to prevent land mafia can effectively prevent land mafia practices and achieve the strategic goals of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs.

Biografi Penulis

  • Olatunji Austine Kehinde, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology ikere-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
    Ph.D Student

Referensi

Chuasanga A., Ong Argo Victoria. (2019). Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia and Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, Vol 2, No 1 (2019) http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/4218

Deen, Thaufiq., Ong Argo Victoria & Sumain. (2018). Public Notary Services In Malaysia. JURNAL AKTA: Vol. 5, No. 4, 1017-1026. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/akta/article/view/4135

Hunter, Susan & Bulirwa, Elizabeth & Kisseka, Edward. (1993). AIDS and agricultural production. Land use policy. 10. 241-58. DOI.10.1016/0264-8377(93)90018-6.

Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management Review, 7(3), 297–317.

Kaldor, M., Anheier, H., & Glasius, M. (2003). Global civil society in an era of regressive globalisation. In M. Kaldor, H. Anheier, & M. Glasius (Eds.), Global civil society 2003 (pp. 3–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keinath, A. K., & Walo, J. C. (2004, November 23). Audit committee responsibilities: Focusing on oversight, open communication, and best practices. The CPA Journal, 74(11), 22–29.

Khurana, R., & Pick, K. (2005). The social nature of boards. Brooklyn Law Review, 70(3), 1259–1285.

Laura Notess (WRI) , Peter Veit (WRI), Iliana Monterroso (WRI), Andiko (WRI), Emmanuel Sulle (WRI), Anne M. Larson (WRI), Anne-Sophie Gindroz (WRI), Julia Quaedvlieg (WRI) and Andrew Williams (WRI) - July 2018, The Scramble for Land Rights, Reducing Inequity between Communities and Companies, https://wri-indonesia.org/en/publication/scramble-land-rights

Lipton, M., & Savitt, W. (2007, May). The many myths of Lucian Bebchuk. Virginia Law Review, 93(3), 733.

Lorsch, J. (1995, January–February). Empowering the board. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 107–117.

Matheson, J. H., & Olson, B. A. (1992). Corporate law and the long term shareholder model of corporate governance. Minnesota Law Review, 76, 1313–1391.

Millstein, I. M., Gregory, H. J., & Grapsas, R. C. (2006, January). Six priorities for boards in 2006. Weil Briefing: Corporate Governance. New York: Wel, Gotsal & Manges.

Monks, R. A. G. (2005, March). Corporate governance—USA—fall 2004 reform—the wrong way and the right way. Corporate Governance, 13(2), 108.

National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) in collaboration with Mercer Delta Consulting. (2006). The role of the board in CEO succession. Washington, DC, and New York: Author.

Ong Argo Victoria, Ade Riusma Ariyana, Devina Arifani. (2020). Code of Ethics and Position of Notary in Indonesia. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review 2 (4), 397-407, http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/SANLaR/article/view/13536

Petra, S. T. (2006). Corporate governance reforms: Fact or fiction. Corporate Governance, 6(2), 107–115.

Rivero, J. C., & Nadler, D. A. (2003). Building a valuable relationship between CEOs and their boards. Mercer Management Journal.

Rose, N. & Wolfram, C. (2002). Regulating executive pay: Using the tax code to influence chief executive officer compensation. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), S138–S175.

Salwen, K. G. (1992, February 14). Shareholder groups cheer SEC’s moves on disclosure of executive compensation. Wall Street Journal, p. A-4.

Spencer Stuart, Board Services Practice. (2008). Cornerstone of the board—the nonexecutive chairman: Offering new solutions. New York: Author.

Wood, David. (1993). Forests to fields. Restoring tropical lands to agriculture. Land use policy. 10. 91-107. 10.1016/0264-8377(93)90001-Q, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11109790_Forests_to_fields_Restoring_tropical_lands_to_agriculture/citation/download

Yaya Kareng, Ong Argo Victoria, R. Juli Moertiyono. (2019). How Notary's Service in Thailand. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 1 (1), 46-56, http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/SANLaR/article/view/4435

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-02-25

Terbitan

Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).