THE REFORMATION OF MEDICAL ORGANIZATIONS IN OMNIBUS LAW ON HEALTH: SINGLE OR MULTI-BAR

Rikko Hudyono; Suparnyo Suparnyo

doi:10.26532/jph.v10i2.32043

Penulis

Rikko Hudyono Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
Suparnyo Suparnyo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muria Kudus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.32043

Kata Kunci:

medical personnel, professional organization, medical ethics, Omnibus Law bill on Health

Abstrak

The Omnibus Law on Health had been approved which in consequence allow other medical professional organizations to be established as doctorsâ€™ right to organize in which may provoke ethical problems. The recent Omnibus Law on Health enabled opportunity for multi-bar organizations; even it was in accordance with single-bar system. This paper aims to review the medical professional organization system in the Omnibus Law on Health which is most in line with the freedom of association and does not reduce the right to health as a human right that must be accepted by the wider community. The author argues that the emergence of several professional organizations as embodiment of doctorâ€™s right may not suitable as it may procure ethical ambiguity. However, the compulsion to join single organization per se was a violation of our Constitution. In this case, we need the highest regulatory and controlling authority from the State to preserve the public interest. The concept of this federal multi-bar association may solve this problem.

Referensi

Books:

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Masyarakat, 2019, Buku Saku Atas Hak Kesehatan;

Marzuki & Suparman, 2017, Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, PUSHAM, Yogyakarta;

Heryana A, 2020, Organisasi dan Teori Organisasi, AHeryana Institute Tangerang;

Serlika Aprita & Yonani Hasyim, 2020, Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Mitra Wacana Media, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta;

Journals:

Abdillah et all, Lembaga Quasi Non Governmental Organization (Quango) Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 49, No. 116, 2019;

Azhari D S & Usman U, Etika Profesi Dalam Perspektif Islam, Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), Vol. 5, No. 1, 2022,

Azmand Sajad & Heydari Mojtaba, Medical Ethics According to Avicennaâ€™s Stance: A Synopsis, Galen Medical Journal, Vol. 7, 2018;

Bahar Elfudllatsan et all, Kajian Mengenai Kebebasan Berkumpul Dan Berserikat Pasal 28e Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Melalui Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Kaitannya Dengan Teori Kedaulatan Rakyat Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, Vol. VII, No 1, 2019;

Della Luysky & Cairin Meilina, Kebebasan berekspresi di era demokrasi: catatan penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia, Lex scientia Law Review, Vol. 2, No 1, 2018;

Hastuti et all, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, Tata Kelola, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020;

Herdi Munte & Christo Sumurung, Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2021;

Husin I, Teori Organisasi, Jurnal GERBANG STMIK Bani Saleh, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2022;

Kristian Megahputra Warong et all, Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Oleh Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Di Media Sosial, Lex Administratum, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2020;

Mikho Ardinata, Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Jaminan Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), Jurnal HAM, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020;

Nur Rahmawati et all, Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif UU ITE, Pranata Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 1, Februari 2021;

Nur Yusriyyah Bakhtiar, dkk., Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Di Muka Umum, Journal Of Lex Theory(JLT), Vol. 1, No. 1, Juni 2020;

Solikin N & Rohmatullah A, 2022, The Regulatory Reform of Advocate Organizations in Proposing Oath of Prospective Advocates in Indonesia, Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2022;

Sufiana Julianja, Pembatasan Kebebasan Berkespresi Dalam Bermedia Sosial: Evaluasi Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia, Padjadjaran Law Review, Vol. 6, 2018;

Supriyatin & Ukilah, Hubungan Hukum Antara Pasien Dengan Tenaga Medis (Dokter) Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2018;

Syukran et all, Konsep Organisasi dan Pengorganisasian dalam Perwujudan Kepentingan Manusia, Publik, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2022,

Website:

Bimo Aria Fundrika, Ramai Testimoni Terapi Cuci Otak Dokter Terawan, Ahli Samakan Dengan Fenomena 'Batu Ponari', Suara.com pada Jum'at, 08 April 2022. Dikutip dari https://www.suara.com/health/2022/04/08/120252/ramai-testimoni-terapi-cuci-otak-dokter-terawan-ahli-samakan-dengan-fenomena-batu-ponari;

Kementerian Kesehatan, Narasi UU Kesehatan, Dikutip dari https://partisipasisehat. kemkes. go.id/ruu /detail?param=ruu

Komisi IX, RUU Kesehatan dipastikan Jauh dari Liberalisasi, Diskriminasi, dan Kriminalisasi Tenaga Kesehatan, Dikutip dari Parlementaria tanggal 18 Mei 2023 secara daring dari https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/44548/t/RUU+Kesehatan+ Dipastikan+Jauh+dari+Liberalisasi%2C+Diskriminasi+dan+Kriminalisasi+Tenaga+Kesehatan;

Suhardi G & Wadah Tunggal, 2022, Editorial Media Indonesia. Sumber: https://mediaindonesia.com/podiums/detail_podiums/2445-wadah-tunggal;

Tempo.com. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1591555/terawan-resmi-bergabung-dengan-pdsi;

Tim detikcom â€“ detikNews. Pernyataan Lengkap PB IDI soal Hasil Muktamar Pemecatan dr Terawan pada tanggal 31 Mar 2022, 13:32 WIB melalui

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6009666/pernyataan-lengkap-pb-idi-soal-hasil-muktamar-pemecatan-dr-terawan yang diakses pada 7 Juni 2023;

World Health Organization, â€Ž2015, Global health ethics key issues: Global Network Of WHO Collaborating Centres For Bioethics, World Health Organization.

https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/164576;

World Medical Association, 2020, Medical Ethics Manual, 3rd Edition.

from https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Ethics_manual_3rd_Nov2015_en.pdf.