NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF NOTARY PROTOCOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i1.15235Kata Kunci:
electronic storage, notary protocol, cyber notaryAbstrak
The notary protocol is a state archive that must be kept and guarded by a notary public. Due to security concerns, maintenance costs and the size of space required further electronic storage of notary protocols can be carried out. This legal research uses a normative juridical approach as a result of the absence of norms. The technique of using legal materials used is the card system technique. The results show that the notary protocol that is stored electronically is important to do considering the duties of a notary as a public official who has the task of searching for the public in the field of civil cases so that the state must make rules regarding the storage of notary electronic protocols in its arrangement with Cyber Notary. The mechanism is to use the transfer media in digital form or scanning. The strength of notary protocol evidence stored in the field of civil law only functions as a backup, not as an electronic one which has binding power because it does not meet the requirements for document authenticity as regulated in Article 1 paragraph. 7 of the Amendments to the Law on Notaries and Article 1868 of the Civil Code and in the field of criminal procedural law, namely that it can be evidence to show evidence that shows other evidence.Referensi
Books :
Alimuddin Siregar. 2019. Pornography Law Regulations, Scopindo Media Pustaka, Surabaya.
Bambang Waluyo. 2020. Criminal Case Settlement; Restorative and Transformative Justice Applications, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Herbert L Pecker. 1998. The Limits of The Criminal Sanction, Stanford University Press, California.
Kemenkumham. 2002. Compilation of Regulations on Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism & Human Rights, Penerbit Cv. Eko Jaya, Jakarta.
Jonaedi Efendi, Ismu Gunaedi Widodo, dan Fifit Fitri Lutfianingsih. 2016. Dictionary of Popular Legal Terms, Kencana, Jakarta.
Muhammad Yusni. 2020. Justice and Corruption Eradication from the Perspective of the Prosecutor's Office, Airlangga University Perss, Surabaya.
Mustika Zed. 2008. Literature Research Methodology , Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.
Annual Report of the Corruption Eradication Commission Year 2016 and 2017.
Ridwan Zachrie dan Wijayanto. 2013. Corruption Corrupts Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Romli Atmasasmita, 2001. Reconstruction of the Principle of No Crime without Error (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld), Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji. 2001. Normative Legal Research (A Brief Overview), Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Titik Triwulan dan Ismu Gunadi Widodo, 2011. State Administrative Law and Indonesian State Administrative Court Procedure, Kencana, Jakarta.
Y. Sri Pudyatmoko. 2009. Licensing: Problems and Efforts to Improve, Grasindo, Jakarta.
Laws :
Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary
Journals :
Edwar, Faisal A. Rani, Dahlan Ali, Notary Position As General Officers Are Reviewed From The Concept Of Equality Before The Law, Hukum dan Pembangunan Journal, Volume 49, Number 1, 2019.
Elfa urdiana, Inter Criminal Liability Islamic Law Perspectives and Its Relevance on Criminal Law Updates Indonesia, Al Mawarid Journal Volume, XII, Number 1 February – August 2012
Ida Bagus Paramaningrat Manuaba, I Wayan Parasa, Notary Concerning Principles In Creating Assets Authentic, Acta Comitas Journal, Volume 19, Nomor 1, April 2018.
Jawade Hafidz, Agung Widodo, Violation of Presidential Decree Number 54 of 2010 concerning Government Procurement of Goods and Services by Goods and Service Providers or Service Users in the Perspective of Corruption Crime, Journal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume II No. 2 May-Augustus 2015;
Kunni Kaffah, Liability and Legal Protection for Notary in Civil Regarding the Deed He Made, Lex Renaissace Journal, Volume 1 Number 2, January 2017
Natal Kristiono, The Politics of Law on Corruption Eradication, Journal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia, Volume 4, Number 3, 2018.
Novianti Wulandari Sitepu, Analysis Of Consumer Protection As Information Users Technology and Communiccations, Ius Civile Journal, Volume 4 Number 2, October 2020.
Nurul Aini, Juridical Analysis of Criminal Sanctions Policies for Returning State Financial Losses in Corruption Crime, Journal of the Criminal Law Section, Volume 2, Number 3, 2014.
Puteri Hikmawati, Recovering of State Financial Losses from the Payment of Compensation for Corruption, Can it be Optimal?, Journal Negara Hukum, Volume. 10, Number 1, 2019.
Rustam, Implementation of Asset Recovery in Corruption (Case Study of the West Sumatra High Prosecutor's Office), Dimensi Journal, Volume. 6, Number. 2, 2017.
Tengku Erwinsyahbana, Melinda, Authorities and Responsibilities of the Substitute Notary after Implementation of Duties and Position Ends, Lentera Hukum Journal, Volume 5 Number 2, 2018.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
