EFFECTIVENESS OF APPLYING PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF JUSTICE IN THE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL CASE

Authors

  • ELif Acar Head of Turkish Student Association in Angkara University, Turky
  • Sugeng Sudrajat Judge at the Court of Singkawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v5i3.3745

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Legal Certainty, Justice

Abstract

The effectiveness of judges' verdict in the trial should ideally contain aspects of the rule of law, justice and expediency. In its implementation is not easy to synergize these three aspects, especially the aspect of legal certainty and fairness are usually contradictory. The results showed that the judge in examining and deciding cases not forever fixated on one principle alone. Constraints faced by judges tend to rule of law in deadlock when written provisions can not answer the problems that exist. Emphasis is more inclined to the principle of justice means should consider a law in society, which is made up of customs and unwritten laws. Judge within reason and legal considerations must be able to accommodate all the provisions that live in the community in the form of customs and unwritten laws. Emphasis tends to be on the principle of expediency over economic nuances.

References

Butarbutar, Elisabet Nurhaini. “Konsep Keadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan pidanaâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Vol. 21 No. 3. Juni 2009. Yogyakarta: FH UGM.

Goesniadhie, Kusnu S. “Perspektif Moral Penegakan Hukum Yang Baikâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 17 No. 2. April 2010. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Hartini. “Pengecualian Terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partum Dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agamaâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 21 No. 2; Juni 2009; Yogyakarta: FH UGM.

Herdyanto, Edy. “Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Sebagai Kendali Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Di Indo-nesiaâ€. Jurnal Yustitia. Vol. 72. September-Desember 2007.

Surakarta: FH Uni-versitas Sebelas Maret Indah, C Maya S. “Mewujudkan Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Media Hukum.

Vol. 14 No. 3. November 2007. Yogyakarta: FH UMY Kanter. 2000. “Etika Profesi Hukum: Sebuah Pendekatan Sosio-Religiusâ€. Cetakan Per-tama. Jakarta:Storia Grafika.

Mahyuni. “Lembaga Damai Dalam Proses Penye-lesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilanâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 16 No. 4. Oktober 2009. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Marzuki, Pieter Mahmud, 2006. Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Kedua Mei. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Muhammad, Rusli. “Strategi Dalam Membangun Kembali Kemandirian Pengadilan Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 25 No. 11. April 2004. Yogyakarta.

Rosadi, Otong. “Hukum Kodrat, Pancasila dan Asas Hukum dalam Pembentukan Hukum Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 10 No. 3. September 2010. Purwoker-to: FH Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

Sufriadi, Yanto. “Penerapan Hukum Progresif Dalam Pemulihan Krisis Hukum Di Tengah Kemacetan Demokrasi di Era Globalâ€. Jur-nal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 17 No. 2. April 2010.

Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Wantu, Fence M. “Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakimâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hu-kum. Vol. 19 No. 3. Oktober 2007. Yogya-karta: FH UGM.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-07

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).