THE COMPARISON OF RECALL RIGHT OR AN INTER-TIME IMPEACHMENT MECHANISM BETWEEN AMERICAN AND INDONESIAN LAW SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.20409Keywords:
Recall Right, Legal Protection, People’s SovereigntyAbstract
This is a study of legal thought regarding regulation of the use of recall right or inter-time impeachment as political parties’ authority accommodated in MD3 Law. This recall authority has indirectly harmed the spirit of people’s sovereignty as the embodiment of a democratic state. To study, it was conducted by applying normative research methods (doctrinal research), and other regulations of written legal materials. Furthermore, it was based on three stages in conducting comparative construction, namely: (1) the descriptive phase, (2) the identification phase and (3) the explanatory phase. Based on the results through library research, the researchers found similarities between recall rights accommodated by Indonesia comparing to the implementation in the United States of America. Additionally, this similarity of recall right regulatory system concept can be used as a thought basis for legal constructions based on the actual legal protection of people’s sovereignty in Indonesian laws.
References
Legal Documents
As Regulated in Article 239 Sec. (1) and Elaborated Further on Other Details in Article 239 Sec. (2) of Law No. 17 of 2014 MD3 Law, n.d.
Constitution of Colorado, n.d.
Louisiana Laws Constitution Article 10 Sec 5, n.d.
National Conference of State Legislatures, n.d.
Books
Achmad Ali and Wiwie Heryani. Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Ali, Achmad. Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis Dan Sosiologis). Dalam Tulisan Hukum Sebagai Kenyataan Dalam Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT. Toko Gunung Agung. Tbk, 2002.
Andrew, Ellis. Head of Electoral Processes, International IDEA’s Work on Recall and Direct Democracy., 2005.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Penguatan Sistem Pmerintahan Dan Peradilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Fajar Mukti. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta, 2010.
Hendri Teja et al. Suara Rakyat Suara Tuhan. Jakarta: Serambi, 2014.
HS Salim dan E.S Nurbani. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Tesis Dan Disertasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.
J, Ibrahim. Teori Dan Metedologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Revisi Ban., 2013.
Mahendra, Ihza Yusril. Dinamika Tatanegara Indonesia: Kompilasi Aktual Masalah Konstitusi, DPR Dan Sistem Kepartaian. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996.
MD, Mahfud. Politik Hukum Baru Menuju Supremasi Hukum Dalam Saldi Isra, Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Mitau, G. Theodore. State and Local Government, Politics and Processes, 1988.
Peter Mahmud M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Syaukani, Imam & Thohari, Ahsin, A. Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Tambunan, ASS. Pemilu Di Indonesia, Susunan Dan Kedudukan MPR, DPR Dan DPRD. Bandung: Binacipta, 1996.
Tenggara, Hamdhany. , Critical Theory, Critical Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies. Bahan Kuliah Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, 2002.
Journals
Aliksan Rauf, Muhamad Aljebra, Marten Bunga, and Hardianto Djanggih. “Hak Recall Partai Politik Terhadap Status Keanggotaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.†Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 4 (2018): 443.
“Critical Legal Studies Initially Developed in the United States in the 1970s as a Coalition of Post-Realist from Legal Theorists. In This Case, If American Legal Realism Can Be Considered as Jazz Jurisprudence, Then Critical Legal Studies Can Be Labelled †(n.d.).
Kamba, WJ. “Comparative Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.†Cambridge University Press 23, no. 3 (1974): 134.
Kasim, Ifdhal. Wacana Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis. 6th ed. Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Transformatif, 2000.
Minutes of the Session of the Constitutional Court Case No. 008/PUUIV/2006 Concerning the Review of Law Number 22 Year 2003 Concerning the Composition and Position of the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD as Well as Law Number 31 Year 2002 Concerning Political Part, n.d.
Rida, Farida. Mekanisme Penggantian Antar Waktu (PAW) Anggota DPR dan
Implikasinya Dalam Konsep Perwakilan Rakyat. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1, no. 2 (2013): 198.
Ridwansyah, Muhammad. “Mewujudkan Keadilan, Kepastian Dan Kemanfaatan Hukum Dalam Qanun Bendera Dan Lambang Aceh.†Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016): 278.
Rumokoy, Nike K. “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Hak Recall Partai Politikdalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Unsrat 20, no. 1 (2012): Blass, Eddie, ‘The Rise and Rise of the Corporate. state, The Office of the secretary of. “Procedure for Recalling State and Local Officials†(2014): 1–28. papers3://publication/uuid/8ADD5EDC-91CF-4FB6-86CB-DAEB1161C5FD.
Website
“Mempertanyakan Hegemoni Penggantian Antar Waktu PAW) Anggota DPR Di Tangan Partai Politik.†http://www.hukumonline.com.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
