LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATORY PROVISIONS ARTICLE 10 VERSE (5) LAW NO. 46 OF 2009 CONCERNING THE CORRUPTION CRIMINAL COURT

Authors

  • Ahmad Fauzi Universitas Brawijaya image/svg+xml
  • Abdul Madjid University of Brawijaya, Malang , East Jawa, Indonesia image/svg+xml
  • Nurini Aprilianda University of Brawijaya, Malang , East Jawa, Indonesia image/svg+xml
  • Prija Djatmika University of Brawijaya, Malang , East Jawa, Indonesia image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i3.12937

Abstract

The corruption criminal court is an institution that is given the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. The purpose of this study was to determine the juridical implications of the principle of the independence of the judicial power. This study uses a normative approach with quantitative analysis. The existence of a corruption court established on judicial power states that a special court can only be formed by a separate law. Then the corruption court is an institution that has the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. In its implementation, the composition of judges in the corruption court is divided into two, namely career judges and ad hoc judges. In its implementation, there are several things in the legislation that are contrary to the principle of independence of judicial power and violate the principle of freedom of judicial power, especially for ad hoc judges in the criminal court of corruption.

References

Djohansyah. J, Reformasi Mahkamah Agung Menuju Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman, (Bekasi, Kesaint Blanck, 2008),

Dworkin, Ronald, Talking Right Seriously, (London, Gerald Duckworth&Co, 1977),

Holl, Anthony&Marc Loth. Reshaping Justice, Judicial Reform and Adjudication In The Netherland (Two Concepts Of The Legal Profession), (Maastrich Shaker Publishing B.V, 2004).

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (edisi kedua) Depertemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, (Jakarta, Balai Pustaka, 1991)

Kaligis, O.C, Antologi Tulisan Ilmu Hukum Jilid 6, (Bandung, PT. Alumni, 2011)

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Bunga Rampai Refleksi Satu Tahun Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, ( Jakarta, Sekertariat Jendral Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2006).

Mahfud MD, Membangun Politik Hukum Konstitusi, (Jakarta, Pustaka LP3ES, 2002).

Manan, Bagir, Prasyarat Kemerdekaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum Tahun XXX No. 348 November 2014.

Marzuki, Suparman, Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dan Konteks Politik Hukum Kekkuasaan Kehakiam: Dalam Hitam Putih Pengadilan Khusus, (Jakarta, Komisi Yudisial,2016)

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum Di Tengah Arus Perubahan, (Malang, Surya Pena Gemilang Publishing, 2016)

Rifai, Ahmad, Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Persfektif Hukum Progresif, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika,) 2010,

Downloads

Published

2020-12-29

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).