The Potential of Solid Waste and Greenhouse Gasses Reduction in Tambak Osowilangon Material Recovery Facility in Indonesia During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Talent Nia Pramestyawati, Ponco Prasetyo, Achmad Chusnun Niam

Abstract


Solid waste generation can increase due to people's activities that increase compared to the early pandemic in 2020. The solid waste management paradigm is no longer focused on landfilling waste in landfills. Solid waste reduction activities can extend the landfill's lifetime, one of the reduction activity facilities is Material Recovery Facilities (MRF). Surabaya, the capital city of East Java Province in Indonesia, has several MRF. One of them is Tambak Osowilangon . This study aims to determine the solid waste reduction in ponds in Osowilangon Material Recovery Facility during the COVID-19 pandemic and to predict greenhouse gas reduction based on solid waste. The triangular method calculates the greenhouse gases (GHG) prediction of solid waste management in Osowilangon MRF. Solid waste generation in Tambak Osowilangon MRF was produced at 2704.946 kg/day. The highest composition of solid waste was achieved by food waste (63%), and the existing reduction of solid waste in Ponds Osowilangon MRF is 56.08%. The total volume of GHG produced without reduction scenario is 6.16 x 10 6 m 3 /year, while the GHG produced from an existing reduction in Tambakosowilangon MRF is 2.4 x 10 6 m 3/ year. Solid waste management in Tambakosowilangon MRF can reduce 61.04% of the total GHG volume

Keywords


greenhouse gas; municipal solid waste; MRF; triangular method

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. M. Kadang and N. Sinaga, “Pengembangan Teknologi Konversi Sampah Untuk Efektifitas Pengolahan Sampah dan Energi Berkelanjutan,†Jurnal Teknika, pp. 33–44, 2021.

R. P. Mahyudin, “KAJIAN PERMASALAHAN PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DAN DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN DI TPA (TEMPAT PEMROSESAN AKHIR),†Jukung, vol. 3, no. 1, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.20527/jukung.v3i1.3201.

L. S. Ng, T. W. Seow, and K. C. Goh, “Implementation on Solid Waste Reduction through 3R (NSWM Policy) and Elements to Close Gap between Policy and Contractors in Construction Industry in Penang,†IJESD, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 668–675, 2015, doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.678.

L. Natalia, Y. Lisafitri, F. C. Alam, J. T. Ryacudu, W. Hui, and J. Agung, “Perencanaan Desain Tempat Pengolahan Sampah 3r (TPS 3R) Di Kecamatan Rajabasa, Kota Bandar Lampung,†p. 10.

Y. Li, S. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Research on Greenhouse Gas Emission Characteristics and Emission Mitigation Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Treatment in Beijing,†Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 8398, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14148398.

M. Dewi and Y. Trihadiningrum, “Feasibility and Development Study of Transfer Stations (TS) and Material Recovery Facilities (TS 3R) in Pare, East Java, Indonesia,†p. 7.

S. Kumar, “Estimation method for national methane emission from solid waste landfills,†Atmospheric Environment, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 3481–3487, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.057.

F. D. Qonitan, I. Wayan Koko Suryawan, and A. Rahman, “Overview of Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Energy Utilization Potential in Major Cities of Indonesia,†J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1858, no. 1, p. 012064, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1858/1/012064.

Y. Avnimelech, R. Eilat, Y. Porat, and P. A. Kottas, “Factors Affecting The Rate Of Windrow Composting In Field Studies,†Compost Science & Utilization, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 114–118, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702169.

M. A. Dzakwan and T. N. Pramestyawati, “Perbandingan Pengangkutan Sampah dengan Truk Kompaktor dan Truk Arm Roll,†p. 8, 2020.

M. K. Jaunich et al., “Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations,†Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 114, pp. 92–102, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.012.

T. N. Pramestyawati and I. D. A. A. Warmadewanthi, “Non Residential Solid Waste Reduction in Krembangan District, North Surabaya,†Media Komunikasi Teknologi, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 113–122, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.31284/j.iptek.2020.v24i2.967.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jacee.6.1.57-64

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.