Legal Consequences of Notarial Deeds Regarding Negligence in Typing Errors in Notarial Deeds

Nurul Mu’alimah, Ira Alia Maerani

Abstract


Notaries must be guided by divine values, human values, justice values, ethical values (adab), unity values, people's values, deliberative values, national values, and other values that are upheld by the Indonesian people. The public places great trust in Notaries. However, Notaries are ordinary people who can make mistakes. One of the errors that can occur is a typo in the Notary's deed. Mistakes and negligence made by the Notary when carrying out his duties can have an impact on the deed he makes. The purpose of this research is to find out: 1) The legal consequences of a deed that has typographical errors in the deed made by the Notary. 2) Efforts taken if a typo occurs. 3) The Notary's responsibility in making the deed if a typographical error occurs. The approach method in this research is sociological juridical. The results of the research concluded: 1) The legal consequences if a Notary makes a typing error in his or her deed due to negligence or lack of care alone can result in civil and administrative sanctions. 2) Typical errors in notarial deeds can be substantive or non-substantive. A non-substantive typographical error means that the error does not cause a significant difference in meaning in the substance of the deed or even if there is a difference in the meaning of words, but in the context of the sentence it cannot be interpreted differently from what is actually intended, including errors in spelling. 3) Article 51 UUJN gives the Notary the authority to correct written errors or typographical errors contained in the Minutes of the signed deed.
Keywords: Deed; Error; Notarial; Typing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Abdulkadi Muhammad. (2001). Etika Profesi Hukum, Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Habib Adjie. (2020). Tafsir Penjelasan dan Komentar Atas Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung, Reflika Aditama

Hasan Utoyo. (2006). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris, Jakarta, Universitas Indonesia

Salim HS. (2015). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu Konsep Teoritis, Kewenangan Notaris Bentuk dan Minuta Akta, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta

Soetandyo Wignyosoebroto. (1992). Profesionalisme dan Etika Profesi. Bandung, Makalah Up Grading

Surratman. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum.Bandung: Alfabeta

Journals:

Endang Sri. (2018). Tanggung Gugat Notaris Atas Kelalaian Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Kredit Bank, in Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, p. 9.

Muhammad Ali. (2018). “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Kesalahan Ketik Pada Minuta Akta Yang Sudah Keluar Salinan Aktaâ€, in Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, p. 10.

Ryno Bagas Prahardika dan Endang Sri Kawuryan. (2018). “Tanggung Gugat Notaris Atas Kelalaian Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Kredit Bank. in Jurnal Transparansi Hukum Vol. 1 No 1, 2018, p. 9.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id