Endry Boeriswati




Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

National Education Association. (2002). Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society: An Educator’s Guide to the “Four Cs”. 215.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad-XXI. Jakarta: BSNP

Leclercq, F 2005, ’The relationship between educational expenditures and outcomes’, Document de Travail DT/2005- 05, Développement Institutions et Analyses à Long terme (DIAL), Paris

Hipkins, R. (2017). Weaving a coherent curriculum: How the idea of capabilities can help. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from

Sudiyanto; Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Volume 19, No 2, Desember 2015 (189-201)

Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic Principle of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press

Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 3-15.

Hyland, K. (2003a). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.

Hyland, K. (2003b). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing. USA: The university of Michigan press.

Paltridge, B. (2000). Genre analysis. In B. Paltridge (Ed), Making sense of discourse analysis. Gold Coast, QLD: Antipodean Educational Enterprises, pp. 105-126

Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Paltridge, B. (2002). Genre, text type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP). In A.M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives. Marwah, N.J: L.Erlbaum, pp. 73-90 Paltridge, B. (2007). Approaches to Genre in ELT. In J. Cummins, & C. davison (Eds.), International handbook of English Language Teaching, Vol. 15, 931-943. Springer US.

Mahsun. (2014). Teks Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Droga, Louis dan Humphrey, Sally. 2005. Grammar and meaning an introducing for primary teachers. New South Wales, Australia: Target Text

Don, H. (2017). Blending Formative and Summative Assessment in a Capstone Subject: “It”s not your tools, it’s how you use them’. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 14(3). Retrieved from

William, D. (2009). Assessment for Learning: Why, What, and How?. London: Institute of Education

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998). The educational psychology series. Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1994). Promoting self determined education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 3–41.

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.

Boekaerts, M. (2006). Self-regulation and effort investment. In K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology volume 4: Child psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 345–377). New York, NY: Wiley

Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 149–167

Dann, R. (2002) Promoting assessment as learning: improving the learning process (London, RoutledgeFalmer).

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Norwich: DfES Publications. Diakses tanggal 02 Pebruari 2006 dari

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37.

Cox, P., & Godfrey, J. (1997). The importance of assessment procedures to student learning outcomes in religious education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2). Retrieved from

Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by design. Alexandria, LA: ASCD.

Mueller, J. (2005). Authentic assessment in the classroom and the library media center. Library Media Connection, 23(7), 1418.

Archbald, D.A., & Newmann, F.M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing: Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Bergen, D. (1993-1994). Authentic performance assessments. Childhood Education, 70(2), 99-102.

Gronlund, G. (2003). Focused early learning: A planning framework for teaching young children. St. Paul, MN: RedleafPress.

Meyer, C. (1992). What's the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39- 40.

Newmann, F., Brandt, R.. & Wiggins, G. (1998). An exchange of views on semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: a close look at 'authentic' assessments. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 19-22.

Wiggins, G. (1989a). Teaching to the (authentic test). Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47.

Wiggins, G. (1989b). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703-716.

Paris, S.G. & Ayres, L.R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers with portfolios and authentic assessment. ERIC Reproductive Services No. 378166.

Campbell, D. (2000). Authentic assessment and authentic standards [Electronic version]. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 405-407.

Karge, B. 1998. Knowing what to teach: Using authentic assessment to improve classroom instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 319-331. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from EBSCO database.

Morris, R. V. 2001. Drama and authentic assessment in a social studies classroom. Social Studies, 92, 41-44. Retrieved May 19, 2004 from EBSCO database.

Prestidge, L. K. & Williams Glaser, C. H. (2000). Authentic assessment: Employing appropriate tools for evaluating students' work in 21st-century classrooms [Electronic version]. Intervention in School & Clinic, 35, 178-182.

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: assessment must first promote learning. In Wilson, M. (Ed.). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part 2) (vol. Part II, pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.

Montealegre, R. (2016). Controversias Piaget-Vygotski en Psicología del Desarrollo. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 19(1), 271-283. DOI: 10.14718/ACP.2016.19.1.12

Crisp, Geoffrey T., (2012), Integrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 37, No. 1, February 2012, 33–43

Gebril, A. (2018). Integrated-skills assessment. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.